3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

automatic shifts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 17, 2004 | 11:18 PM
  #26  
speeddemon7's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,400
Likes: 0
From: colorado
for me the problem is that I would like to upgrade the intercooler to a front mount,the pre cat to a downpipe and the cat with a high flow one plus I already have a intake and catback installed.Wih all these mods a good aftermarket fuel management system is a must.So converting to a stick seems like the only viable option.
Also I could be mistaken but I thought the rear gearing of 3.9 actually gave our cars less accelaration off the line compared to a 4.1 or 4.3 gear ratio.Someone correct me if I am mistaken.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2004 | 11:32 PM
  #27  
Cihuuy's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
From: Myanmar
maybe its time to change AT fluid?? and AT filters??

Mine shifts smoothly... except wen the engine is still cold. So i let it warm for a minute or 2 and then i go and dive it.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2004 | 01:10 AM
  #28  
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 773
Likes: 0
From: WILBURTON, OKLAHOMA
My auto shifts hard enough to kick your head back a little if you are not expecting it. When I am just slowly crusing around. I have a T78 and just about every other mod you can think of. Soon to be manual though, I have already ordered my new ACT prolight flywheel and Extreme Street clutch. Will be driving down to Dallas to pick up the rest the parts soon.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2004 | 08:06 AM
  #29  
weaklink's Avatar
Resident Retard
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,918
Likes: 0
From: Cockaigne
Originally posted by speeddemon7
for me the problem is that I would like to upgrade the intercooler to a front mount,the pre cat to a downpipe and the cat with a high flow one plus I already have a intake and catback installed.Wih all these mods a good aftermarket fuel management system is a must.So converting to a stick seems like the only viable option.
Also I could be mistaken but I thought the rear gearing of 3.9 actually gave our cars less accelaration off the line compared to a 4.1 or 4.3 gear ratio.Someone correct me if I am mistaken.
no, you're right, that's why switching to a 4.10 or 4.30 yields better acceleration.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2004 | 08:10 AM
  #30  
weaklink's Avatar
Resident Retard
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,918
Likes: 0
From: Cockaigne
Originally posted by areXseven
Not on mine. I only get about 2100 rpm stall on mine. As for a 4.10 ring and pinion, that's not much of an improvement over the 3.90 rear, ...4.30's would be a better choice.
check your FSM...stock stall is 3000. yeah 4.30 would be good for drag racing, not sure about daily driving.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2004 | 08:42 AM
  #31  
areXseven's Avatar
il Cosa Nostra e vivo!!
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,096
Likes: 1
From: Dove le cose sono fatte il vecchio moda il senso
Originally posted by weaklink
check your FSM...stock stall is 3000. yeah 4.30 would be good for drag racing, not sure about daily driving.
Copy That, but, It doesn't change the fact that my 93 only gets a top-end stall of about 2100 before tire spin starts. And I'm averaging only 500 miles per month on the car so 4:30s wouldn't be so bad. As it is now, at a steady 80mph the car revs at 2800, so with 4:30s it shouldn't exceed 3500-3700?.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2004 | 05:08 PM
  #32  
walken's Avatar
Registered Loser
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,224
Likes: 0
From: Whiterock
w/o power braking how is your car from a stop? I seems like my 88na when I had the 5/6 ports open. Like I can't whip a left u-turn in an auto FD but in an FC the car just loves to slide. On right turns though, It seems I can get enough boost to make it go sideways.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2004 | 06:59 PM
  #33  
Ball joint's Avatar
Turbo Lover
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 783
Likes: 0
From: Cleveland
Originally posted by weaklink
check your FSM...stock stall is 3000. yeah 4.30 would be good for drag racing, not sure about daily driving.
Hey if you put 4.30's in wouldnt it screw with the shifting when in D?? and also what do you mean by FSM?
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2004 | 09:14 AM
  #34  
Cihuuy's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
From: Myanmar
areXseven... could a bad torque converter cause a lower stall speed?? or is that the opposite??
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2004 | 11:49 AM
  #35  
weaklink's Avatar
Resident Retard
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,918
Likes: 0
From: Cockaigne
Originally posted by Ball joint
Hey if you put 4.30's in wouldnt it screw with the shifting when in D?? and also what do you mean by FSM?
fsm=field service manual
not sure about your other Qs, but it does seem feasible. the ecu is computer controlled, so i think shifts are rpm controlled-so should be ok. speedo would be off a bit.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2004 | 11:53 AM
  #36  
areXseven's Avatar
il Cosa Nostra e vivo!!
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,096
Likes: 1
From: Dove le cose sono fatte il vecchio moda il senso
Originally posted by Cihuuy
areXseven... could a bad torque converter cause a lower stall speed?? or is that the opposite??
I'm sure that would only be one of the MANY problems associated with a bad Converter!!
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2004 | 11:02 AM
  #37  
Ball joint's Avatar
Turbo Lover
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 783
Likes: 0
From: Cleveland
wouldnt putting in the 4.30's kill top end power? like 120+
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2004 | 11:16 AM
  #38  
areXseven's Avatar
il Cosa Nostra e vivo!!
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,096
Likes: 1
From: Dove le cose sono fatte il vecchio moda il senso
It will definitely kill top-end speed. Unless you like cruzin at 130 mph doing 6K rpm. But will produce much quicker launch/time and faster 1/4 mile E-T!!
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2004 | 01:42 AM
  #39  
bludskorge's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From: new york
Even though our cars cant use the power fc what about a piggy back to slighty increase the fuel? Like a safc or something? Also I was reading some people are running single turbo kits on an automatic how do you do it with a stock ecu? Last I have read in many diff threads you can use the powerfc you just get a blinking hold light or something to that nature. I could live with that. just my 2 cents
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2004 | 06:54 AM
  #40  
weaklink's Avatar
Resident Retard
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,918
Likes: 0
From: Cockaigne
back from the dead! Well I run a single turbo auto and I use a PFC. I guess you could run a single turbo with the stock ecu IF you were VERY and I mean overly cautious that you ran no more than 10psi of boost. The SAFC does not add enough fuel to reliably run a single. PFS piggyback may work. Not sure about greddy emanage, despite initial claims the AEM ecu DOES NOT WORK with auto rx7s.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2004 | 07:00 AM
  #41  
weaklink's Avatar
Resident Retard
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,918
Likes: 0
From: Cockaigne
BTW this has been discussed ad nauseum. do a search on "PFC" and "auto", or "ecu" and "auto", or search under my user name (go back, way back).
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
distr0
Canadian Forum
3
Oct 7, 2015 08:17 AM
Turblown
Single Turbo RX-7's
1
Sep 30, 2015 05:58 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:45 PM.