3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Apexi Commander/ Boost question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 10, 2007 | 07:42 PM
  #1  
chemicool's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
From: McAllen, TX
Apexi Commander/ Boost question

Hi all,

I have some questions. Does anyone know how much boost the stock '99 twins will produce? Max? This can be controlled by a computer and boost controller like Apexi?

What is the highest boost one can run on pump gas?

Thanks
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2007 | 10:10 AM
  #2  
CantGoStraight's Avatar
What's your point ?
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 3,573
Likes: 0
From: Gainesville, Fla.
pump gas is only a small factor of your boost limitation. What computer are you running and what do you plan to have it tuned to. There are members running 18 psi on the stock twin (the 99'S may be capable of a slightly higher psi) if your planning on running 18 or higher for any period of time a single should be in your future. The stock fuel system is good for 14psi max (everything being perfect) and the stock ecu is good for 10psi period.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2007 | 11:48 AM
  #3  
dgeesaman's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 12,313
Likes: 27
From: Hershey PA
The boost level is controlled in the Apex'i PFC by using the stock solenoids. These are slow and are not the best choice for boost control unless you're deviating from stock by just a couple psi. You'll want a manual or electronic boost controller.

The usable max for stock or 99-spec twins is maybe 15psi. That is not a hard limit, but higher boost causes higher air intake temps. The highest power ever made from stock turbos was around 18psi IIRC, but the air intake temps were very high, it probably wasn't on pump gas, and the turbos probably didn't last long.

If you are running nearly stock power, you're going to need a bunch of fuel, intake, ecu, and exhaust mods to get to where running elevated boost is reasonable.

BTW, there are many past discussions on these exact subjects. Use the search feature, and feel free to ask/add to the past threads.

Dave
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2007 | 01:03 PM
  #4  
chemicool's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
From: McAllen, TX
Originally Posted by dgeesaman
The boost level is controlled in the Apex'i PFC by using the stock solenoids. These are slow and are not the best choice for boost control unless you're deviating from stock by just a couple psi. You'll want a manual or electronic boost controller.

The usable max for stock or 99-spec twins is maybe 15psi. That is not a hard limit, but higher boost causes higher air intake temps. The highest power ever made from stock turbos was around 18psi IIRC, but the air intake temps were very high, it probably wasn't on pump gas, and the turbos probably didn't last long.

If you are running nearly stock power, you're going to need a bunch of fuel, intake, ecu, and exhaust mods to get to where running elevated boost is reasonable.

BTW, there are many past discussions on these exact subjects. Use the search feature, and feel free to ask/add to the past threads.

Dave

Thanks for your reply. I probably wouldn't want to go higher than 15 PSI. The higher intake temps would be taken care of by intercooler upgrade. You say the turbos wouldn't last long but why would running at higher boost make them crap out as long as temps were kept down and oil was cooled? I guess I just wonder why so many people go to single turbos for more power when the stocks are capable of quite a bit more and less turbo lag?

As far as searching previous threads I have tried that before but then I have to read through hundreds of posts that end up goin off on tangents/ rants about some other bull.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2007 | 04:32 PM
  #5  
dgeesaman's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 12,313
Likes: 27
From: Hershey PA
Well the stock sequential controls will work at 15psi+ if you install a pressure regulator on the pressure tank.

The temps go up both in/around the turbocharger assembly and in the intake temps. Higher intake temps mean less power and shorter engine life. Single turbo setups will flow more cfm at lower AIT than the stockers, and produce a lot less heat under the hood. Overall it's the superior setup for higher boost. If power is your goal with sequential, I suggest BNR Stage 3's. This is a really good upgrade over stock without leaving sequential land.

Dave
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2007 | 04:49 PM
  #6  
Kento's Avatar
2/4 wheel cornering fiend
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,090
Likes: 3
From: Pasadena, CA
Originally Posted by chemicool
You say the turbos wouldn't last long but why would running at higher boost make them crap out as long as temps were kept down and oil was cooled?
Because besides the overall assembly temps that Dave mentioned, running the turbos constantly at such high boost numbers causes major stress on the turbo shafts due to the sustained ultra-high rpm (surely upwards of 150,000 rpm or more). The stock Hitachi turbos were not intended nor designed to run at that pace for long.
Originally Posted by chemicool
I guess I just wonder why so many people go to single turbos for more power when the stocks are capable of quite a bit more and less turbo lag?
Because once you venture well beyond a particular turbo's efficiency range, you begin producing more heat than you do horsepower, which ends up being destructive in more ways than one.
Originally Posted by chemicool
As far as searching previous threads I have tried that before but then I have to read through hundreds of posts that end up goin off on tangents/ rants about some other bull.
An unfortunate by-product of trying to research stuff on a forum. You just have to be patient and scroll past the riff-raff.
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2007 | 01:12 AM
  #7  
chemicool's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
From: McAllen, TX
Thanks for the input. I will give it some thought. I am taking my car to Gotham Racing soon to have an engine rebuild/ upgrades, tune. i will talk to Steve about options. He says the stock '99s are good for 340 rwhp with the appropriate supporting mods. That's plenty for me for awhile.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
streetlegal?
New Member RX-7 Technical
13
Mar 17, 2022 02:46 PM
cristoDathird
Introduce yourself
28
May 30, 2019 08:47 PM
Skeese
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
65
Mar 28, 2017 03:30 PM
Snoopy FD
Build Threads
25
Dec 8, 2015 01:45 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:43 AM.