Any dyno charts of 400 rwhp on stock twins?
#1
Missin' my FD
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Seminole, FL (Tampa Bay Area)
Posts: 1,755
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Any dyno charts of 400 rwhp on stock twins?
I was having a friendly discussion with another forum member who thinks that 400 rwhp on stock sequential twins is possible. I was under the impression that it is not. I've always heard that 360 whp @ 16 psi is about all you'll get. This person has a 365 whp dyno at 16 psi.
Anyways, is 400 rwhp possible on stock sequential twins on a stock motor? I know JD (Boostn7) made 402 rwhp according to his signature, but I'm fairly sure that was running nonsequential.
I know that even if it is possible, it's going to kill the turbos from all the heat. Regardless, ignore that. I just want to see a dyno chart (or hear reliable info) of a stock sequential twins car with stock motor making 400 rwhp.
Thanks.
Anyways, is 400 rwhp possible on stock sequential twins on a stock motor? I know JD (Boostn7) made 402 rwhp according to his signature, but I'm fairly sure that was running nonsequential.
I know that even if it is possible, it's going to kill the turbos from all the heat. Regardless, ignore that. I just want to see a dyno chart (or hear reliable info) of a stock sequential twins car with stock motor making 400 rwhp.
Thanks.
#4
Missin' my FD
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Seminole, FL (Tampa Bay Area)
Posts: 1,755
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by pianoprodigy
I know that even if it is possible, it's going to kill the turbos from all the heat. Regardless, ignore that.
Trending Topics
#11
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
assuming it's not bs, these are very good #s for 6500 rpm and Mustang dyno
https://www.rx7club.com/time-slips-dyno-121/spank-dyno-chart-411977/
https://www.rx7club.com/time-slips-dyno-121/spank-dyno-chart-411977/
#12
Mr. Links
iTrader: (1)
pianoprodigy,
Unless there are some old schoolers like Kevin or Jim who know something different, I've only seen a few "close" to 400rwhp with the sequential setup and those weren't on stock twins. One was artguy with the M2 twins (around 380rwhp) and kwikrx7 a little lower using the BNR's.
Unless there are some old schoolers like Kevin or Jim who know something different, I've only seen a few "close" to 400rwhp with the sequential setup and those weren't on stock twins. One was artguy with the M2 twins (around 380rwhp) and kwikrx7 a little lower using the BNR's.
#13
Missin' my FD
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Seminole, FL (Tampa Bay Area)
Posts: 1,755
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mahjik
pianoprodigy,
Unless there are some old schoolers like Kevin or Jim who know something different, I've only seen a few "close" to 400rwhp with the sequential setup and those weren't on stock twins. One was artguy with the M2 twins (around 380rwhp) and kwikrx7 a little lower using the BNR's.
Unless there are some old schoolers like Kevin or Jim who know something different, I've only seen a few "close" to 400rwhp with the sequential setup and those weren't on stock twins. One was artguy with the M2 twins (around 380rwhp) and kwikrx7 a little lower using the BNR's.
#14
Do it right, do it once
iTrader: (30)
Originally Posted by superior_force
assuming it's not bs, these are very good #s for 6500 rpm and Mustang dyno
https://www.rx7club.com/showthread.php?t=411977
https://www.rx7club.com/showthread.php?t=411977
#15
I don't recall anyone running at 400+ on stock twins in sequential trim. At anything nearing those power levels the sequential operation actually becomes a handicap restricting flow with no real benefit in spool time as there is essentially none. Why does it matter if it's running in sequential mode? Are you wondering if the stock wheels and housings can do 400+ or is this some silly pissing match you're having with someone saying, it didn't come from the factory in non-sequential!?
#16
Missin' my FD
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Seminole, FL (Tampa Bay Area)
Posts: 1,755
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Kevin T. Wyum
I don't recall anyone running at 400+ on stock twins in sequential trim. At anything nearing those power levels the sequential operation actually becomes a handicap restricting flow with no real benefit in spool time as there is essentially none. Why does it matter if it's running in sequential mode? Are you wondering if the stock wheels and housings can do 400+ or is this some silly pissing match you're having with someone saying, it didn't come from the factory in non-sequential!?
#17
DinoDude
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Harpers Ferry, West Virginia
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What difference would sequential versus non-sequential make for ultimate power? Once both turbos are on, they are on. How can there be a difference from from 4,500 RPM up?
#18
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
i tune on sunday with steve kan. Hopefully going to up the boost above my current 15psi. I have all the boltons stock twins and motor. so stay tuned. I doubt i get anything near that level but we will see.
If you do a search under my username you will see i have taken a pretty good amount of heat for this very discussion. I share your view but alot of the oldschoolers think 400rwhp and 120mph traps are attainable and more importantly safely done.
i will link a member who has one of the more vocal oppossing view to this thread
If you do a search under my username you will see i have taken a pretty good amount of heat for this very discussion. I share your view but alot of the oldschoolers think 400rwhp and 120mph traps are attainable and more importantly safely done.
i will link a member who has one of the more vocal oppossing view to this thread
Last edited by matty; 04-14-05 at 08:28 AM.
#19
Missin' my FD
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Seminole, FL (Tampa Bay Area)
Posts: 1,755
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by tcb100
What difference would sequential versus non-sequential make for ultimate power? Once both turbos are on, they are on. How can there be a difference from from 4,500 RPM up?
#20
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Originally Posted by tcb100
What difference would sequential versus non-sequential make for ultimate power? Once both turbos are on, they are on. How can there be a difference from from 4,500 RPM up?
#21
Mr. Links
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by matty
going ns takes out some restrictions. more flow = more power.
Originally Posted by tcb100
What difference would sequential versus non-sequential make for ultimate power? Once both turbos are on, they are on. How can there be a difference from from 4,500 RPM up?
However, many people have run into problems with the sequential system when trying to increase the power (beyond a certain point). This is why people going for power only either go non-seq or single turbo.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Montreal
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I realized a little something while i was reading this post, can the stock injectors duty cycle handle the 16psi fuel map? If not what should i need? 850ccs all around?
#23
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Originally Posted by RotorFrank
I realized a little something while i was reading this post, can the stock injectors duty cycle handle the 16psi fuel map? If not what should i need? 850ccs all around?
#24
DinoDude
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Harpers Ferry, West Virginia
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RotorFrank, I run 17-18 lbs at the drag strip on race gas, with the stock injectors but an upgraded fuel pump. I don't think bigger injectors are needed with the usual bolt-ons. My duty cycles are 90%-95%. I don't know what other upgrades you have done to your car, of course.
Mahjik, the dynos I have seen eliminate the dip that occurs as the first turbo starts to run out of steam. You get a more linear plot, but I like low end too much to consider it.
Seems to me the bottom line is boost. If you get more boost non-sequential, I can understand more power but usually non-sequentials and sequentials pretty much boost the same when both turbos are at full bore. I run a cat so I have plenty of restriction anyway.
Boostn7's numbers are like Secretariat's heart - a freak of nature. The power he makes, his times, his 60foot times on drag radials, are simply unreachable by us mere mortals.
Mahjik, the dynos I have seen eliminate the dip that occurs as the first turbo starts to run out of steam. You get a more linear plot, but I like low end too much to consider it.
Seems to me the bottom line is boost. If you get more boost non-sequential, I can understand more power but usually non-sequentials and sequentials pretty much boost the same when both turbos are at full bore. I run a cat so I have plenty of restriction anyway.
Boostn7's numbers are like Secretariat's heart - a freak of nature. The power he makes, his times, his 60foot times on drag radials, are simply unreachable by us mere mortals.
#25
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Originally Posted by tcb100
RotorFrank, I run 17-18 lbs at the drag strip on race gas, with the stock injectors but an upgraded fuel pump. I don't think bigger injectors are needed with the usual bolt-ons. My duty cycles are 90%-95%. I don't know what other upgrades you have done to your car, of course.
Mahjik, the dynos I have seen eliminate the dip that occurs as the first turbo starts to run out of steam. You get a more linear plot, but I like low end too much to consider it.
Seems to me the bottom line is boost. If you get more boost non-sequential, I can understand more power but usually non-sequentials and sequentials pretty much boost the same when both turbos are at full bore. I run a cat so I have plenty of restriction anyway.
Boostn7's numbers are like Secretariat's heart - a freak of nature. The power he makes, his times, his 60foot times on drag radials, are simply unreachable by us mere mortals.
Mahjik, the dynos I have seen eliminate the dip that occurs as the first turbo starts to run out of steam. You get a more linear plot, but I like low end too much to consider it.
Seems to me the bottom line is boost. If you get more boost non-sequential, I can understand more power but usually non-sequentials and sequentials pretty much boost the same when both turbos are at full bore. I run a cat so I have plenty of restriction anyway.
Boostn7's numbers are like Secretariat's heart - a freak of nature. The power he makes, his times, his 60foot times on drag radials, are simply unreachable by us mere mortals.