3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

is the aem air bypass valve any good?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 11, 2002 | 10:58 PM
  #1  
poor college student's Avatar
Thread Starter
Red Mist
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,420
Likes: 0
From: UCLA
is the aem air bypass valve any good?

i was talking to someone and he said that this is a POS, but then like he doesn't sound like he knows too much... so i'ma ask you guys... you guys seem to know most stuffers...
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2002 | 07:55 AM
  #2  
Roadracing7's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
From: Simpsonville, SC
You want my opinion? It's the biggest piece of crap on the market, and AEM has done such a wonderful job with their marketing of it, that people actually believe it's useful. First of all, do you drive your car in lakes? How about creeks or rivers? Rain puddles that are deeper than a foot? I hope you're not asking about an AEM for a 3rd gen RX, but in case you are, is this intake going to be mounted where you plan on it being submerged in water? The Honda guys that run their "cold air" intakes next to the ground to get that "cold air" put those things in the intake piping so that if that filter is submerged in water, the engine won't pull the water in. First of all, that's a good uphill battle for water, and does a Honda pull that much compression (sorry, couldn't resist)? Second, by putting a foam piece between the pipe in the engine bay, doesn't you just pull in "hot air"? And third, when you get regular rain mist and drops hit your intake, it's not going to seize your engine even if it makes it all the way up the tubing and through the throttle body, intake manifold, etc... Wasn't it hot in that engine and that's why you wanted the "cold air" anyway?
I sell parts locally and the guys who insist their engine is going to blow up if they don't have it totally blow my mind with how much they believe what they're told to believe. But hey, I just smile and take their money. Anyone have some good evidence against my views? I would love to hear them.
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2002 | 10:21 AM
  #3  
rynberg's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 10
From: San Lorenzo, California
I agree, looks like a load of $@#% to me. If you are driving your FD through a puddle deep enough to get a significant amount of water into your intake, you have bigger problems to worry about -- like floating away. In any case, I'd LOVE to see the evidence that anyone's engine has actually been damaged this way.
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2002 | 12:24 AM
  #4  
artowar2's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
From: Was SoCal
AEM air bypass valve? For the FD?? Hah, if it's anything like their ECU for the FD, your car will be 50 years old before they release it!!
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2002 | 01:07 AM
  #5  
martini's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 723
Likes: 0
From: Bellingham, WA
it's a bullshit marketing ploy.

worthless.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trickster
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
25
Jul 1, 2023 04:40 PM
BNR34RB26DETT
Build Threads
42
Feb 28, 2018 11:27 AM
Wolf_
Single Turbo RX-7's
3
Aug 11, 2015 04:23 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:11 PM.