3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Ackk! Aftermarket Flywheel Bolt stretch

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 10, 2005 | 06:52 PM
  #1  
PVerdieck's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,742
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Ackk! Aftermarket Flywheel Bolt stretch

OK. Doing clutch and flywheel job on FD. Act flywheel and spec clutch. Was tightening up the ACT bolts provided for bolting on to the counterweight.

The pieces of junk stretched. I was using a torque wrench with clicking/popping for set torque. It was tested on a wheel nut and worked.

So now I need to find a source of high tension bolts to use.

Will the automatic flex plate bolts work? Are they long enough?

If not, what are my options? McMaster-Carr?

I was attempting to torque to 76 lbs (low side listed in manual for attaching bolts to drive plate).

This blows.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2005 | 03:28 AM
  #2  
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
McMaster should have some good stuff, you could also try Ababa Bolts.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2005 | 08:34 AM
  #3  
twokrx7's Avatar
Need more sleep
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,690
Likes: 3
From: Woodlands TX
That's very weird. What torque value were you using?
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2005 | 10:47 AM
  #4  
PVerdieck's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,742
Likes: 0
From: Houston
As I said, we used 76 lbs.

That is the low value, specified on page K-157, auto trans, drive plate attachment, torque 76-81 lbs.

I will call APR tomorrow, to see if they over M10, 1.25, .75 shank length bolts
I will also go to the dealer, and see how the stock auto trans ones look.

Last edited by PVerdieck; Sep 11, 2005 at 10:49 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2005 | 11:31 AM
  #5  
Mahjik's Avatar
Mr. Links
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 27,595
Likes: 43
From: Kansas City, MO
I'll need to look again, but I don't remember those bolts being torqued that high. Usually those size are around 40-44 ft/lbs.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2005 | 04:47 PM
  #6  
Matt Hey's Avatar
Old School
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
From: Baldwin City, KS
I agree with Mahjik. I think the torque spec should be about 40 ft/lbs. Another place for bolts...

http://www.boltdepot.com/

Be sure to get 10.9 grade bolts.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2005 | 09:30 PM
  #7  
PVerdieck's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,742
Likes: 0
From: Houston
40 lbs? Holding down a 12 lb flywheel on one side and a X lb counterweight on the other?

We were also using blue loctite on them.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2005 | 09:39 PM
  #8  
PVerdieck's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,742
Likes: 0
From: Houston
n/t
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2005 | 09:46 PM
  #9  
Mahjik's Avatar
Mr. Links
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 27,595
Likes: 43
From: Kansas City, MO
Originally Posted by PVerdieck
40 lbs? Holding down a 12 lb flywheel on one side and a X lb counterweight on the other?

We were also using blue loctite on them.
Considering the engine studs themselves are around around 28 ft/lbs stock, yea that's about right.

IIRC, my Racing Beat FW had all the torque specs with it and I know they weren't that high (70'ish that is). Heck, the bolts for the pressure plate are only like 20 ft/lbs.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2005 | 10:13 AM
  #10  
KevinK2's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,209
Likes: 6
From: Delaware
My RB flywheel instructions said 28 ft lbs, with lower values for the pressure plate.

28 ft-lbs gets you about 5000 lbs preload per bolt at about 55 ksi stress. Gr 8.8 has a min yield of 96 ksi.

I thought there were (6) M10 bolts ... that would be 30,000 lbs of clamping force. Sounds like enough ....

Over torquing with mega strength bolts could strip the tapped holes.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2005 | 10:49 AM
  #11  
Mahjik's Avatar
Mr. Links
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 27,595
Likes: 43
From: Kansas City, MO
Originally Posted by KevinK2
My RB flywheel instructions said 28 ft lbs, with lower values for the pressure plate.
That sounds about right (although I used around 30 ft lbs). Glad you had the RB instructions handy.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2005 | 12:30 PM
  #12  
KevinW's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
so when bolting on a LWFW each bolt should be torqued @ about 28lbs?
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2005 | 09:16 AM
  #13  
PVerdieck's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,742
Likes: 0
From: Houston
OK, I buy what you guys are saying. I also called Jason, and the tech at his shop is using 28-30 lbs.

IN OUR DEFENSE:


P. K-157
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2005 | 12:00 PM
  #14  
KevinW's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
so why does that say 76-81 lb
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2005 | 12:14 PM
  #15  
Mahjik's Avatar
Mr. Links
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 27,595
Likes: 43
From: Kansas City, MO
Originally Posted by KevinW
so why does that say 76-81 lb
Because it's not exactly the same parts. Those doesn't always transfer over to aftermarket parts (as I found out with my strut replacement one day ).

I'm surprised ACT doesn't have a sheet with torque specs with their flywheel/counterweight bolts like Racing Beat.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2005 | 03:20 PM
  #16  
KevinK2's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,209
Likes: 6
From: Delaware
http://www.iluvmyrx7.com/

both 93 and 94 manual pdf's spec it at 32-44 ft-lbs

could be fsm error, or wrong fsm?
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2005 | 06:32 PM
  #17  
PVerdieck's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,742
Likes: 0
From: Houston
must be a FSM error.

from my 94 RX-7 Factory Workshop Manual, copyright 1993.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2005 | 11:06 PM
  #18  
KevinK2's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,209
Likes: 6
From: Delaware
in my 93 fsm, right on pg C-81, wrong on K-157.
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2005 | 07:42 AM
  #19  
PVerdieck's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,742
Likes: 0
From: Houston
C-82 correct for me. Thanks.
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2005 | 08:10 AM
  #20  
ArcWelder's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
I guess not exactly wrong on K-157 as that is probably the correct torque spec for the drive plate with an automatic transmission. It's not the correct flywheel/counterweight torque spec for the manual trans.

Anyhow, for replacement high quality hardware I use Maryland Metrics.

http://mdmetric.com/

Originally Posted by KevinK2
in my 93 fsm, right on pg C-81, wrong on K-157.
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2005 | 10:22 AM
  #21  
KevinK2's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,209
Likes: 6
From: Delaware
the manual flywheel and counterweight are one piece, no 6 cap screws means no torque spec. K-157 refers to atx, and is wrong.
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2005 | 11:50 AM
  #22  
Hyperite's Avatar
Vagina Junction
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,838
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
I did 45 ft/lbs for my ACT SS
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2005 | 12:45 PM
  #23  
ArcWelder's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Yes, got your point. Manual is conflicting on torque spec for auto trans from C-81 (corrrect) to K-157 (incorrect). No torque spec stock, man trans vs. aftermarket seperate flywheel and counterweight so use correct torque spec from page C-81 for auto trans.

Originally Posted by KevinK2
the manual flywheel and counterweight are one piece, no 6 cap screws means no torque spec. K-157 refers to atx, and is wrong.
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2005 | 04:39 PM
  #24  
jdtanksley's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
From: Chattanooga, TN
I went throught the same thing when I swapped out my clutch and flywheel. I found out the hard way that the specs listed at not correct. I found the same picture in two different places in the factory manual, each having very different numbers. I think someone got confused about which numbers they were starting out with in that particular picture when they were doing their N-m, kgf-m, ft-lb conversions.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 09:22 PM
  #25  
ACTman's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 47
Likes: 1
From: lancaster, ca
Just to confirm the numbers you were using are wrong, we suggest 45-50 ftlbs. There is no way they would use 80ftlbs for 10mm bolts so it must be an error. The bolts provided are grade 10.9 which aint bad. I thought there were instructions with torque specs provided, but if not, I apologize.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Enzo1944
New Member RX-7 Technical
2
Sep 6, 2015 08:57 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:59 AM.