3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

ABV and CRV Same Part Number?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 23, 2006 | 12:24 AM
  #1  
nicad2's Avatar
Thread Starter
HC is too high
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 189
Likes: 4
From: USA
ABV and CRV Same Part Number?

Though The Air Bypass Valve (ABV) and Charge Relief Valve (CRV) have similar functions, are the the exact same part number? While reviewing the turbo troubleshooter at http://www.autosportracetech.com/RX-...leshooting.htm I noticed the the test conditions for these valves are not the same. So, I checked my ABV and CRV and they have the same part number: "N390 084900-0580 CRV".

Was the previous owner a bonehead? Are these supposed to be the same part?
Attached Thumbnails ABV and CRV Same Part Number?-01230003-.jpg  
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2006 | 12:38 AM
  #2  
moconnor's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,678
Likes: 96
From: Bay Area, CA
The ABV has N3A1 084900-065 0 written on it. They are not the same.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2006 | 08:30 AM
  #3  
DaleClark's Avatar
RX-7 Bad Ass
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (56)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,622
Likes: 2,724
From: Pensacola, FL
They do have different part numbers and different labels on it, but functionally they seem to be the same. I think the major difference is the label for techs to know which one is which.

Might be worth getting a good used one of the one you don't have just so things are right (small things like this bug the heck out of me ). But, I seriously doubt any boost problems you might have are related to this.

Has anyone actually had a stock ABV/CBV actually *fail*? From what I've seen, they're pretty durable and reliable.

Dale
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2006 | 09:34 AM
  #4  
nicad2's Avatar
Thread Starter
HC is too high
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 189
Likes: 4
From: USA
It appears that I have two CRVs. Would someone please post their CRV model number for comparison.

Dale,
I'm glad to hear that these are functionally the same. Do you know why their test conditions are slightly different? Is it just an oversight? From the turbo troubleshooting page:

ABV:
With a vacuum tester apply 3.9-6.7 inHg of vacuum to port (A), verify air will flow from port (B) to port (C). At 9.2 inHg of vacuum to port (A) the valve will be fully open.

CRV
With a vacuum tester apply 6.5-9.3 inHg of vacuum to port (A), verify air will flow from port (B) to port (C).
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2006 | 10:28 AM
  #5  
Mahjik's Avatar
Mr. Links
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 27,595
Likes: 43
From: Kansas City, MO
Originally Posted by nicad2
Dale,
I'm glad to hear that these are functionally the same. Do you know why their test conditions are slightly different? Is it just an oversight?
By functionally, he means they will 'function' the same (i.e. releasing air) by exchanging them, but it's not ideal.

I believe I still have my stock BOV laying around if you need one.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2006 | 05:00 PM
  #6  
RotaryResurrection's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,576
Likes: 27
From: Morristown, TN (east of Knoxville)
The crv is a bit softer than the abv...it opens easier with vacuum applied.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2006 | 05:21 PM
  #7  
fastrx7r1-rotary's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
From: US
Originally Posted by DaleClark
Has anyone actually had a stock ABV/CBV actually *fail*? From what I've seen, they're pretty durable and reliable.

Dale
When I bought my FD it had a nasty loud RFL bov on it. Not liking the ricer sound, I installed the stock BOV. Boost response was markedly worse. I couldn't believe it thinking I had screwed something up re-installing it, but all was OK. Reinstalled the loud ricer bov and worked better.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2006 | 07:08 PM
  #8  
DaleClark's Avatar
RX-7 Bad Ass
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (56)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,622
Likes: 2,724
From: Pensacola, FL
Hmm, that's interesting. I guess the only real difference is the spring pressure on the BOV. The CRV has a stiffer spring of the two - might be an upgrade if you're running enough boost to overcome the spring, but I haven't heard of anyone with that problem.

Dale
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2006 | 09:17 PM
  #9  
Mahjik's Avatar
Mr. Links
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 27,595
Likes: 43
From: Kansas City, MO
Originally Posted by fastrx7r1-rotary
When I bought my FD it had a nasty loud RFL bov on it. Not liking the ricer sound, I installed the stock BOV. Boost response was markedly worse. I couldn't believe it thinking I had screwed something up re-installing it, but all was OK. Reinstalled the loud ricer bov and worked better.
Yep. Since the aftermarket BOV's have stronger springs, you'll notice a little better boost response over the stock unit. Garfinkle on TN apparently does a modification to the stock BOV to replace the stock spring with a stronger one.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2006 | 03:37 PM
  #10  
pfgasket's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
From: Southampton, England
Both valves are supposed to be able to stay closed with 15 psi applied in the direction of flow with the control lines disconnected. A crude test to see if you have a problem is to have the discharge side of the bypass valve disconnected from the air filter box. Rev the engine wide open throttle, to more than 5k revs, but less than red line, and see if there is any discharge from the valve. Mine did, so I rigged up a simple test rig using a standard air line blower with a 1/4" end. I set the air line pressure using an old boost gauge and the applied the 15 psi to the valve, with a hose within a hose to make the seal. It blew at about 4 psi. I've subsequently got a good used one that passes both tests, but what pressure is the bypass valve supposed to stand with the control line connected and under pressure?
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2011 | 05:12 PM
  #11  
ojdaboostman's Avatar
broke for a cause
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
From: kelowna bc canada
Witch valve goes where im having issues with mine and I mixed them up.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2011 | 05:22 PM
  #12  
Hotwheelz's Avatar
Who say's i need a Van
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 609
Likes: 2
From: Whatsittoya
ABV=front....CRV=Rear
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2012 | 10:28 PM
  #13  
M104-AMG's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,857
Likes: 6
From: FL
FYI, the part numbers have changed:

ABV ( air bypass valve ): N3A1-20-250
CRV ( charge relief valve ): N390-20-250

:-) neil
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2014 | 06:37 PM
  #14  
kraneous's Avatar
pistons are for brakes
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
From: Canada
AB crv failure?

I think my crv might have failed...or is damaged anyway. I got my car smoke tested and it looks like there was quite a bit of smoke coming from the valve itself. I wonder if that could be causing the slight surge I get when my car idles?
Is that verified that those new numbers are the proper replacement parts?

ABV ( air bypass valve ): N3A1-20-250
CRV ( charge relief valve ): N390-20-250
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
diabolical1
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
30
Jan 30, 2016 05:50 AM
josef 91 vert
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
23
Sep 3, 2015 11:20 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:02 PM.