'94 FD with 17,106 actual miles.....
'94 FD with 17,106 actual miles.....
Well, I may have to go looky at this....see if it is for real or not. Just appeared in the paper. 1 owner, '94 with only 17,106 miles.
Hmmmmmm.......
Hmmmmmm.......
bajaman,
Is that car in the KC area? If so, then it's probably the one that a few of the local guys checked out a few months back. If it's the same one, the odometer has been changed. It was changed when a new engine was put into the car.
If you want, I can dig through the archives of the local messages and see if I can find it. There were other problems with the car as well (boost problems and some other things), if it's the same car that is....
Is that car in the KC area? If so, then it's probably the one that a few of the local guys checked out a few months back. If it's the same one, the odometer has been changed. It was changed when a new engine was put into the car.
If you want, I can dig through the archives of the local messages and see if I can find it. There were other problems with the car as well (boost problems and some other things), if it's the same car that is....
Originally posted by striker
but, why change it too such a low # when the interior and the rest of the car is not going to look low milage? would it not be kinda fishy?
but, why change it too such a low # when the interior and the rest of the car is not going to look low milage? would it not be kinda fishy?
However, I don't believe it's the same car. I think the one I'm thinking about was a '93, not a '94.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Postman09
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
0
Sep 29, 2015 11:23 AM



