3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

3rd gen vs S5 rotors that are 9 to 1 compression

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-24-09, 06:33 AM
  #1  
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
outinnowhere3193's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Terre Haute, Indiana
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
3rd gen vs S5 rotors that are 9 to 1 compression

Ok so as some have noticed I've started making post and pm'ing people and asking all types of questions lol. The reason why is I have a RX8 Renesis that I'm going to put rx7 rotor's in...or should I say trying to do. This is my latest new thing I came across.

Cam at pettit racing told me I wanted the fd rotors cause they was 9.0 compression but when I look at a chart it shows that the s5 tII are 9.0 compression as well...and then he told me the S5 had a hardened stationary gear and he wasn't sure that'd be a good thing since mine isn't.

So I guess my question is can I run the S5 or no. Do you guys put the S5 TII in your FD with no problem or is that considered a no no?

Then if you say it's ok to do so..next question lol I noticed back in 86 n/a they had a 8.3 compression rotor. wouldn't that be better??? cause if so I have a 86 na sitting right here that needs rebuilt. That I could care less about right now.
Old 11-24-09, 08:29 AM
  #2  
Mr. Links

iTrader: (1)
 
Mahjik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 27,595
Received 40 Likes on 26 Posts
It seems the difference is with the bearings:

https://www.rx7club.com/showpost.php...5&postcount=12

It seems that if you use later bearings, you should be good with using older rotors. I don't think I would go with the 8.5 rotors as they are heavier.
Old 11-24-09, 08:30 AM
  #3  
rotorhead

iTrader: (3)
 
arghx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: cold
Posts: 16,182
Received 429 Likes on 263 Posts
86-88 non turbo--9.4:1
86-88 turbo--8.5:1
89-91 non turbo--9.7:1 , lightened compared to 86-88
89-91 turbo--9.0:1 , lightened compared to 86-88



as for the rotor weight issue... I take my 86-88 rotors to 7500-8000rpm, right where the power starts flattening out. I don't feel comfortable taking the rpms much higher; rev limiter is about 8200. A nice advantage of the 8.5:1 is the increased safety factor though.
Attached Thumbnails 3rd gen vs S5 rotors that are 9 to 1 compression-s5_s6_engine.jpg  
Old 11-24-09, 09:32 AM
  #4  
Eh

iTrader: (56)
 
djseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 6,544
Received 333 Likes on 189 Posts
The s5 TII rotors work perfectly fine. Make sure to weigh the two rotors you are using and make sure the weight difference is within spec.
Old 11-24-09, 11:13 AM
  #5  
Rotary Enthusiast

iTrader: (2)
 
catch-22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 1,254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
what does a stock 3rd gen rotor weight?
Old 11-24-09, 04:43 PM
  #6  
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
outinnowhere3193's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Terre Haute, Indiana
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks everyone for your input...so since I have a set of the 86 and I've already talked to someone else that was offering them cheap. I think I'm going with the low compression.

So far this is what I got for the car..lol I have a set of almost new rotor housing...I'll then have 8.5 compression with the ALS side seals and apex seals. I got the 6 port renesis...with a GT-35 turbo. I'm in the process of building my turbo manifold outta 321. So far I have water temp, oil temp, greddy boost controller and manual both, wideband and a EGT temp gauge...anything else you guys recommend?

From my understandings....from
0-15 psi I can run on pump gas with 11.1-11.5 afr
15-25 psi would run 10.8 - 11.3 ruff with water meth inj.
My EGT's should be around 1600 but can have peaks that hit like 1800 but not continuous...correct?
Old 11-24-09, 08:41 PM
  #7  
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
outinnowhere3193's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Terre Haute, Indiana
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
oh and I know everyone says you can't just give maps cause all cars are different..but could someone give me a timing curve for the lower compression rotor's that's safe. not to retarted but not advanced either. One that's just good enough I can get my break in miles onto the car and then I'm going to take it to banaza and have them to the car. As far as boost would I do the 1 degree per 2 pounds of boost or is it the other way around or kinda what's the rule of thumb on that.
Old 11-24-09, 08:48 PM
  #8  
Mr. Links

iTrader: (1)
 
Mahjik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 27,595
Received 40 Likes on 26 Posts
Arrow

For tuning assistance, post questions in the Engine Management forum:

https://www.rx7club.com/engine-management-forum-37/
Old 11-24-09, 10:55 PM
  #9  
Eh

iTrader: (56)
 
djseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 6,544
Received 333 Likes on 189 Posts
The the 86 rotors are not a direct swap. You need a different counterweight and flywheel.
Old 11-24-09, 11:55 PM
  #10  
Unhealthy Obsession

iTrader: (3)
 
rx927's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NNJ
Posts: 482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Im interested in how your putting the Rx8 Msp parts in this build?
Old 11-25-09, 05:11 AM
  #11  
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
outinnowhere3193's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Terre Haute, Indiana
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rx927
Im interested in how your putting the Rx8 Msp parts in this build?
it's 6 in the morning and I haven't been to bed yet...MSP help me out will ya
Old 11-25-09, 07:00 AM
  #12  
rotorhead

iTrader: (3)
 
arghx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: cold
Posts: 16,182
Received 429 Likes on 263 Posts




my 8.5:1 rotors timing map that I've been running for a few months now. AFR is about 11.4:1 rock solid, leaning out to 11.7:1 around 7500rpm as the power drops off. This tune is for straight 93 octane. It's safe but IMO not overly conservative for a 400+rwhp car (T67/T04R turbo). It's pretty much designed so I can just get in the car, put any 93 octane pump gas in it (I go to the discount gas stations sometimes), and beat the **** out of it without worrying. I am running 16psi which puts me right in the middle of the 20000 and 22000 rows.

units: 10000 is atmospheric pressure
20000 is 1.0 kg/cm^2 boost (about 14.22) psi , 22000 is 17psi,
30000 is 2.0 kg c/m^2 near where the MAP sensor maxes out

note that I use 4 stock Rx-7 trailing plugs (BUR9EQ)
Attached Thumbnails 3rd gen vs S5 rotors that are 9 to 1 compression-igl.jpg   3rd gen vs S5 rotors that are 9 to 1 compression-igt.jpg  
Old 11-25-09, 07:51 AM
  #13  
Rotary Enthusiast

iTrader: (17)
 
Six Rotors's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Pluto
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by outinnowhere3193
it's 6 in the morning and I haven't been to bed yet...MSP help me out will ya
MSP=Multi Side Port.The question really is if you plan to use the side port housings of an RX-8 motor,and if you use any 13B rotor(other than an RX8 rotor),how are you going to solve the issue of gas leakage when the rotor is at Top Dead Centre?

The RX8 rotor has a cut off seal between the side seal and the oil seal to prevent exhaust gas leakage into the intake.
Old 11-25-09, 12:49 PM
  #14  
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
outinnowhere3193's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Terre Haute, Indiana
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Six Rotors
MSP=Multi Side Port.The question really is if you plan to use the side port housings of an RX-8 motor,and if you use any 13B rotor(other than an RX8 rotor),how are you going to solve the issue of gas leakage when the rotor is at Top Dead Centre?

The RX8 rotor has a cut off seal between the side seal and the oil seal to prevent exhaust gas leakage into the intake.
Oh... ok I got ya...that grove has been machined into a couple junk rotor's already to test them. Everything went well and perfect.

That was the least of my concern...it's the side seals.
Old 11-25-09, 04:11 PM
  #15  
NizzleMania Productions

iTrader: (5)
 
MrNizzles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: California
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
sounds interesting, could you spec out your motor a little more? whats been done/planned etc.
Old 11-25-09, 06:17 PM
  #16  
Rotary Enthusiast

iTrader: (17)
 
Six Rotors's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Pluto
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by outinnowhere3193
Oh... ok I got ya...that grove has been machined into a couple junk rotor's already to test them. Everything went well and perfect.

That was the least of my concern...it's the side seals.
No you haven't got me!I was merely trying to explain MSP for you.

The side seals should not be a problem,your machinist should be able to cut a keystone grove to fit an rx8 side seal.

I see little point in using earlier rotors.Having turboed my RX8(which I sold 2 years ago and replaced with an FD3S),my real issue was engine management;but this appears to have been solved in the past 2-3 years(see Mazdamaniac et al).Power levels being achieved are coming up and reliability is getting better.With the 2009 model year changes to the lubrication system I would think that a turboed RX8 motor can be built with the same level of reliability as anything built with old rotors.
Old 11-25-09, 08:26 PM
  #17  
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
outinnowhere3193's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Terre Haute, Indiana
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Six Rotors
No you haven't got me!I was merely trying to explain MSP for you.

The side seals should not be a problem,your machinist should be able to cut a keystone grove to fit an rx8 side seal.

I see little point in using earlier rotors.Having turboed my RX8(which I sold 2 years ago and replaced with an FD3S),my real issue was engine management;but this appears to have been solved in the past 2-3 years(see Mazdamaniac et al).Power levels being achieved are coming up and reliability is getting better.With the 2009 model year changes to the lubrication system I would think that a turboed RX8 motor can be built with the same level of reliability as anything built with old rotors.

I was running 14psi with my gt-35 turbo. It had no problem suppling the boost..and I have heat shield after heat shield making sure the intake didn't see any heat from my front mount turbo. My car was good putting down in the upper 400's if not low 500's I hadn't dyno'd again after the boost went up. I was running just pump gas..car ran great for about 3 month and slowly it started giving out. Apex seals again for the second time. I had my own tune the first time and had it tuned the second time. This second more only lasted 3 months.. The first lasted about 6 months. I keep blowing seals so for me it's either my fuel isn't high enough grade or the rx8 seals just aren't that great. I don't know one person on the rx8club site that has a turbo or even supercharger that hasn't went threw a engine before they hit 10k miles with it. I use the microtech..just like a lot of these guys on here. Oh and the first go around...yeah it lasted 3 more months..boost was at 10psi.

First motor I ran low on gas...it's what did my motor in....I was going down the highway on my way to the gas station knowing I was low. Cruise set at 60 miles and hour couple of sputters and I pushed the clutch in and started coasting. I put gas in it and it ran like *** afterwards.

Second motor....well everything was good came home from work..with no problems...start my car the next day and it died...started it back up and ran fine..didn't think anything of it. Drove to work and it died a couple of times at the stop signs. By the time I went to work and got home it wouldn't idle period...thought maybe I have a charge piping leak. Tightened everything and checked over stuff. Found one small issue and fixed it. Went for a drive to the local gas station...still dieing..but pulled in and actually got it to idle...not smooth but it idled.. I used the rest room and got a pop. Hopped back into the car.. I had I'd say about 140 degree's of temp so I got on it a little in first...then hit second and all of a sudden at like 6000 it started to pull and fell on it's face. I let off and of course it died. I dropped the clutch to fire her back up and it's missing bigger then ****. Front apex gone and front corner seals swelled cutting groves in my irons.

So the corner seals is my guess why my idle was crap...loosing compression. But why did they do what they did and why did my apex go? corner seals and everything else still in tact just worn to hell
Attached Thumbnails 3rd gen vs S5 rotors that are 9 to 1 compression-picture-067.jpg  
Old 11-25-09, 08:42 PM
  #18  
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
outinnowhere3193's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Terre Haute, Indiana
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MrNizzles
sounds interesting, could you spec out your motor a little more? whats been done/planned etc.
well it's the 6 port renesis. It has a little intake and exhaust porting done...there isn't a whole lot you can do. On my intake all my ports are opened up 24/7 I'm always a 6 port. Makes it where my idle has to be rich cause other wise it falls on it's face when you first touch light throttle. WOT is fine.

Car has the FD 5 speed transmission
3.9 gears in the rear
Gt-35 turbo
soon to have a water/meth inj.
it's a daily driver...previously pushing high 400's
It's a fast and furious look a like
spends more time in the garage then it does on the road lol.
IDK what do you want to know?
Attached Thumbnails 3rd gen vs S5 rotors that are 9 to 1 compression-picture-053.jpg   3rd gen vs S5 rotors that are 9 to 1 compression-n501523013_1116803_1705.jpg  
Old 11-25-09, 09:11 PM
  #19  
Unhealthy Obsession

iTrader: (3)
 
rx927's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NNJ
Posts: 482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Any dyno graphs for videos of your last setup running.

Let me get this straight your last setup was a Gt35 on the Rx8 motor with all ports opened up and the rest stock internals.

Now your planning Rx8 side irons with all ports open, Fd housings, and S5 rotors machined to work with the Rx8 side irons?
Old 11-25-09, 09:14 PM
  #20  
Unhealthy Obsession

iTrader: (3)
 
rx927's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NNJ
Posts: 482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And how hard was the Microtech wiring on the Rx8?
Old 11-26-09, 02:11 AM
  #21  
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
outinnowhere3193's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Terre Haute, Indiana
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rx927
Any dyno graphs for videos of your last setup running.

Let me get this straight your last setup was a Gt35 on the Rx8 motor with all ports opened up and the rest stock internals.

Now your planning Rx8 side irons with all ports open, Fd housings, and S5 rotors machined to work with the Rx8 side irons?
yeah that was my last setup...and yes the plan is to continue all the same stuff. The huge porting of the rx8 makes it easy to get plenty of air and fuel to it and so far the exhaust side is holding up. I didn't have a EGT before and I got one now.

And yes internals besides like bearing for racing are all stock. For the RX8 there isn't a whole lot of choices when it comes to seals. That's why I'm going with the rx7 seals. I was just going to machine my 8 rotors for the 7 groove...but then cam said something about doing lower compression and he said he's done it and it worked. So I thought the lower compression with better seals..and the added water/meth inj. should build me a very reliable and powerful engine.

Although it got mentioned to me and offered a set of unbreakable seals for my rx8 which really interest me.
Old 11-26-09, 02:13 AM
  #22  
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
outinnowhere3193's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Terre Haute, Indiana
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
oh and as far as the port I had the two set-ups the first and then the second. The first was with 4 ports on the low and mid end and open up to 6 at 6000. But why wait so long to let it have the air and for the power? I'll upload a video of what it was like with it that way.
Old 11-26-09, 03:49 AM
  #23  
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
outinnowhere3193's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Terre Haute, Indiana
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ok here you go...the first take off shows the kinda torque I have with the ports open...and the last take off shows the big change in power when the ports open.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WuJEWL7WfEE
Old 11-26-09, 09:16 AM
  #24  
Eh

iTrader: (56)
 
djseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 6,544
Received 333 Likes on 189 Posts
Originally Posted by outinnowhere3193
I was running 14psi with my gt-35 turbo. It had no problem suppling the boost..and I have heat shield after heat shield making sure the intake didn't see any heat from my front mount turbo. My car was good putting down in the upper 400's if not low 500's I hadn't dyno'd again after the boost went up. I was running just pump gas..car ran great for about 3 month and slowly it started giving out. Apex seals again for the second time. l
Are you saying you think you were making close to 500rwhp on 14 psi on a 35R? Hopefully I didnt understand fully and you realize it was maybe 400rwhp on 14psi with that turbo.
Old 11-26-09, 11:33 AM
  #25  
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
outinnowhere3193's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Terre Haute, Indiana
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm not a 100% sure what my turbo is. I've heard it was a gt35. I have a mazsport kit..and they hid what turbo they used. There's no numbers or marking of any kind on it to figure it out.

As far as the power....I did low 300's with a extreme rich dyno at a bouncing 6 to 8 psi of boost. Everytime I hit 8 psi it was getting so much fuel that it was bogging and dieing out....dropping into the solid 9's. I was boosting 14 psi on the 10:1 rotors and I was comparing my car to others. There is a few 400 or so called 400 here and I pull them as well. I really have no clue what turbo or what power I had. I just guessed there is a guy named chris hitting over 500 or so said hitting over at 20 psi but then again you haven't heard him talk to much either. I assume he blew his up as well. They was making there own seals suppose to be top of the line.

The guy that claims this over 500 posted a video and I compared his acceleration in 3rd gear compared to mine and they was almost the same. So that's why I assume I'm...or was high 400 and low 500's


Quick Reply: 3rd gen vs S5 rotors that are 9 to 1 compression



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:42 PM.