3rd gen facts you wanted to know (again)
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
3rd gen facts you wanted to know (again)
Here are the stats for the FD RX-7 sales for those that wanted to know. Straight from Mazda Japan.
Series-6.........( Oct-91 - Dec-95 ) = 45,596
Series-7.........( Jan-96 - Nov-98 ) = 09,754
Series-8.........( Dec-98 - Aug-02 )= 12,951
FD RX-7 total...............................= 69,301
This is total sales for export & domestic versions..............
Sounds a lot until you learn Mazda did 811,000 RX-7s in total. (3 generations)
The series-6 was exported through out the world, hence its higher sales figures.
The series-7 was Japan & Australia only
The series-8 was Japan only.
Best sales year was 1992...........26,899. Released onto the world stage that year. Most 1992 models sold in the USA
Biggest contrast was 1993...........6,801. Approximately a 75% drop in sales. That signed the (export) death warrant for the end of the series-6
.
Series-6.........( Oct-91 - Dec-95 ) = 45,596
Series-7.........( Jan-96 - Nov-98 ) = 09,754
Series-8.........( Dec-98 - Aug-02 )= 12,951
FD RX-7 total...............................= 69,301
This is total sales for export & domestic versions..............
Sounds a lot until you learn Mazda did 811,000 RX-7s in total. (3 generations)
The series-6 was exported through out the world, hence its higher sales figures.
The series-7 was Japan & Australia only
The series-8 was Japan only.
Best sales year was 1992...........26,899. Released onto the world stage that year. Most 1992 models sold in the USA
Biggest contrast was 1993...........6,801. Approximately a 75% drop in sales. That signed the (export) death warrant for the end of the series-6
.
#4
the production dates you mention and the australian 'series' terminology don't match.
the japanese divide the FD production runs into 6 separate 'series':
I 91-93
II 93-95 (I and II parallal what they got in the US)
III 95 (these are what the australians got up to 98)
IV 96-98
V 98-00
VI 00-02
the three big divisions are I-III, IV and V-VI. That's what series 6, 7, 8 should really be. Therefore, if you wanted to be really pedantic, australia didn't really get series 7. But then again, it's australian terminology, so it's a battle of semantics that goes around in circles...
the japanese divide the FD production runs into 6 separate 'series':
I 91-93
II 93-95 (I and II parallal what they got in the US)
III 95 (these are what the australians got up to 98)
IV 96-98
V 98-00
VI 00-02
the three big divisions are I-III, IV and V-VI. That's what series 6, 7, 8 should really be. Therefore, if you wanted to be really pedantic, australia didn't really get series 7. But then again, it's australian terminology, so it's a battle of semantics that goes around in circles...
#5
just to clarify that, australia got I, II, and they were the only country outside of japan to get the III.
That's why australian owners keep buying 16bit PFCs for their 'series 7' cars and finding that the harnesses don't match up.
That's why australian owners keep buying 16bit PFCs for their 'series 7' cars and finding that the harnesses don't match up.
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by DaiOni
just to clarify that, australia got I, II, and they were the only country outside of japan to get the III.
That's why australian owners keep buying 16bit PFCs for their 'series 7' cars and finding that the harnesses don't match up.
That's why australian owners keep buying 16bit PFCs for their 'series 7' cars and finding that the harnesses don't match up.
Australia got the 1,2,3 & FD3S-40000, (96-98) just not with the 16-bit ECU or some other goodies. One shoud research their facts before they attempt to steel thunder.......
.
Trending Topics
#8
lol, pretty weak thunder. If you think flying the owned flag will make bullshit into wine, then more power to you.
what you are describing is something that aesthetically looks like a type IV, but doesn't have the mechanical upgrades - that is a type III.
the '4' chassis code won't help you either - as I've personally verified that some of the type III cars carried that code.
so you can keep getting your info 'straight from mazda japan', or whatever website you got it from. I'll go down to my local mazda dealership in japan, talk to them, and read the references they have.
what you are describing is something that aesthetically looks like a type IV, but doesn't have the mechanical upgrades - that is a type III.
the '4' chassis code won't help you either - as I've personally verified that some of the type III cars carried that code.
so you can keep getting your info 'straight from mazda japan', or whatever website you got it from. I'll go down to my local mazda dealership in japan, talk to them, and read the references they have.
#9
...and you might want to dig a little deeper - you'll find that mazda australia was roundly criticised by local motoring journalists for not passing on the updated model.
so whatever view you want to take, the bottom line is that the australian FD, after 95, was simply an outdated version - that's unarguable.
so whatever view you want to take, the bottom line is that the australian FD, after 95, was simply an outdated version - that's unarguable.
#10
Mi Casa Yu Casa
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Japan Tokyo
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
so whatever view you want to take, the bottom line is that the australian FD, after 95, was simply an outdated version - that's unarguable.[/QUOTE]
So Australia never brought in the series IV FD? (Japanese system that is.) Aussie series terminology is confusing.
So Australia never brought in the series IV FD? (Japanese system that is.) Aussie series terminology is confusing.
#11
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,805
Received 2,578 Likes
on
1,831 Posts
Originally Posted by DaiOni
...and you might want to dig a little deeper - you'll find that mazda australia was roundly criticised by local motoring journalists for not passing on the updated model.
so whatever view you want to take, the bottom line is that the australian FD, after 95, was simply an outdated version - that's unarguable.
so whatever view you want to take, the bottom line is that the australian FD, after 95, was simply an outdated version - that's unarguable.
#12
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by chopstix
Originally Posted by DaiOni
so whatever view you want to take, the bottom line is that the australian FD, after 95, was simply an outdated version - that's unarguable.
I own an Australian delivered series-IV FD as you put it. It apears this little kid above is splitting hairs trying to cover his mistakes. I'd suggest you crawl under a rock now little boy.
Like dmrh pointed out, Australia was the only country outside Japan to get the 96-98 version (or series-IV FD or series-7 RX-7 or whatever). My Aussie spec RX-7 has the FD3S-4 VIN stamped into it, not an FD3S3 VIN as our little boy is wrongly trying to confuse you all with. Agreed, we didn't get the 16 bit ecu upgrade. So because the australian version didn't get that upgrade how does that make our FD3S4 versions an FD3S3 version. Some people are so wound up in their own little worlds they cant see tell the real world from their fake one.
For the record. My RX-7 is FD3S4000021 or the 21st "version-4" sold by Mazda Australia back in 1996.
#16
Originally Posted by SP-II
I own an Australian delivered series-IV FD as you put it. It apears this little kid above is splitting hairs trying to cover his mistakes. I'd suggest you crawl under a rock now little boy.
Like dmrh pointed out, Australia was the only country outside Japan to get the 96-98 version (or series-IV FD or series-7 RX-7 or whatever). My Aussie spec RX-7 has the FD3S-4 VIN stamped into it, not an FD3S3 VIN as our little boy is wrongly trying to confuse you all with. Agreed, we didn't get the 16 bit ecu upgrade. So because the australian version didn't get that upgrade how does that make our FD3S4 versions an FD3S3 version. Some people are so wound up in their own little worlds they cant see tell the real world from their fake one.
For the record. My RX-7 is FD3S4000021 or the 21st "version-4" sold by Mazda Australia back in 1996.
Like dmrh pointed out, Australia was the only country outside Japan to get the 96-98 version (or series-IV FD or series-7 RX-7 or whatever). My Aussie spec RX-7 has the FD3S-4 VIN stamped into it, not an FD3S3 VIN as our little boy is wrongly trying to confuse you all with. Agreed, we didn't get the 16 bit ecu upgrade. So because the australian version didn't get that upgrade how does that make our FD3S4 versions an FD3S3 version. Some people are so wound up in their own little worlds they cant see tell the real world from their fake one.
For the record. My RX-7 is FD3S4000021 or the 21st "version-4" sold by Mazda Australia back in 1996.
Your chassis code is irrelevant to the point I'm trying to make - which is that the 'series 7' isn't really an upgraded car - it's almost completely a version III.
Mazda Japan will tell you that some version III cars wear a IV chassis code - there was clearly an overlap period. I know this for fact - because it changed my opinion on the matter - and I actually researched it at a mazda dealership in japan. I know my information is completely accurate. I know you simply can't get your head around that. Too bad.
All Australia got was another car in the s6 mould. What that is worth, is up to you to decide.
IMO (and I agree it's a battle of semantics) - you shouldn't transpose australian terminology over japanese data. That's the bottom line point I've tried to make here.
here's a question for you - what makes a version IV different to a version III?
BTW - the language you've used to label me as a 'kid' is incredibly ironic.
#18
the version III had the whale tail (III is typically called 'series 6')
australian series 7 doesn't have the round tailights, doesn't have an updated y-pipe (hmm... just like a version III...)
there's more!
australian series 7 doesn't have the round tailights, doesn't have an updated y-pipe (hmm... just like a version III...)
there's more!
#19
and if we're going to play the nitpicking game:
"Biggest contrast was 1993...........6,801. Approximately a 75% drop in sales. That signed the (export) death warrant for the end of the series-6"
that's a domestic sales figure. The global sales figure for 93 was 11,431.
"Biggest contrast was 1993...........6,801. Approximately a 75% drop in sales. That signed the (export) death warrant for the end of the series-6"
that's a domestic sales figure. The global sales figure for 93 was 11,431.
#20
rotor rotor pow.
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by DaiOni
what makes a version IV different to a version III?
seems like u're saying that the revision III fd's are some kind of in-between spec fds that have mixed characteristics between the cars we got in the US aka series 6, and true japanese series 7 cars.
#21
Mi Casa Yu Casa
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Japan Tokyo
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[QUOTE=SP-II]I own an Australian delivered series-IV FD as you put it. It apears this little kid above is splitting hairs trying to cover his mistakes. I'd suggest you crawl under a rock now little boy.
I dont know who exactly your talking to, but if its me I was only asking a question, not making a statement.
I dont know who exactly your talking to, but if its me I was only asking a question, not making a statement.
#22
lol, I think that wonderfully crude insult was aimed at me - gotta love keyboard warriors.
if you think about it - the I and the II parallal perfectly with export version (albeit with their slight variations - pollution gear, added options), yet what happened with the III (in terms of exports)? Did they just skip to the IV? Then you take a look at what the australian 'series 7' had (or more importantly what it didn't have) and you find yourself looking at _almost_ a carbon copy of the III. Did mazda japan build them all in a version III 'leftovers' mould (just as they did with their runout bathurst-r two seaters) - the evidence certainly hints that it could be the case.
if you think about it - the I and the II parallal perfectly with export version (albeit with their slight variations - pollution gear, added options), yet what happened with the III (in terms of exports)? Did they just skip to the IV? Then you take a look at what the australian 'series 7' had (or more importantly what it didn't have) and you find yourself looking at _almost_ a carbon copy of the III. Did mazda japan build them all in a version III 'leftovers' mould (just as they did with their runout bathurst-r two seaters) - the evidence certainly hints that it could be the case.
#23
Originally Posted by DaiOni
the version III had the whale tail (III is typically called 'series 6')
australian series 7 doesn't have the round tailights, doesn't have an updated y-pipe (hmm... just like a version III...)
there's more!
australian series 7 doesn't have the round tailights, doesn't have an updated y-pipe (hmm... just like a version III...)
there's more!
I'd believe DaiOni on this subject more then anyone else.
#24
well it is a 'real series 7' - because that's what australian's call a 'series 7'. It isn't, however (and IMO), equivalent to a version IV.
At best, it's a hybrid version significantly based on the version III.
The reason I made a comment at all, is because the 'series' terminology keeps being applied to JDM cars - and it doesn't apply. Keep it in context gentlemen, please.
At best, it's a hybrid version significantly based on the version III.
The reason I made a comment at all, is because the 'series' terminology keeps being applied to JDM cars - and it doesn't apply. Keep it in context gentlemen, please.