3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

386.6 rwhp on stock twins! dynosheet posted

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-26-03, 09:33 PM
  #51  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary


Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
rotaryextreme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Union City, CA
Posts: 3,500
Received 341 Likes on 253 Posts
3/4 91 octane mixed with 1/4 100 octane unleaded ERC.

Chuck Huang


Originally posted by 1FooknTiteFD
are those numbers on race gas or 91 octane? very impressive nevertheless congrats on the guy who owns the car
Old 01-26-03, 10:31 PM
  #52  
Senior Member

 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Sunny Trinidad & Tobago
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey Chuck,

Man.. those are some nice numbers, very nice. I'm actually working on the same thing you guys are doing ..but mine is non-seq

..good work.

3G7
Old 01-26-03, 11:17 PM
  #53  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary


Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
rotaryextreme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Union City, CA
Posts: 3,500
Received 341 Likes on 253 Posts
Hello, what happened to the T51R kai that you bought?? Don't tell me you sold it already. It's a great turbo.

Chuck Huang

Originally posted by 3rdGen7
Hey Chuck,

Man.. those are some nice numbers, very nice. I'm actually working on the same thing you guys are doing ..but mine is non-seq

..good work.

3G7
Old 01-27-03, 09:33 AM
  #54  
Weird Cat Man

 
Wargasm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: A pale blue dot
Posts: 2,868
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally posted by Boostn7
Wargasm...Chuck...read my last post...

His 1.15kg/cm2 on PowerFC was about the same boost as my car.

MY powerFC registered 1.12-1.14kg/cm2 on those last dyno runs......and I know I did not run 16psi.
Boostn7,

The reason I had 18 PSI for your dyno is from your "400 rwhp" thread where you said you were running 17.5 PSI.

https://www.rx7club.com/forum/showth...hreadid=152271

I guess you had the conversion wrong... so I'm assuming that the 1.14 kg/cm2 is correct which gives me 16 PSI

Let's get those units straight people hehehe

Brian
Old 01-27-03, 09:51 AM
  #55  
Weird Cat Man

 
Wargasm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: A pale blue dot
Posts: 2,868
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally posted by Marshall
Hey Wargasm,
Can you fix Stephen's (SPO's) low end numbers???
Marshall,

I think my numbers are accurate. Go back and look at his dyno and you will see that the torque scale on the left is from 50-450 and the horsepower scale on the right is from 0-450... So the numbers come out a little "off" if you are looking at the wrong side of the Y axis.

Regards,
Brian
Old 01-27-03, 10:17 AM
  #56  
WTB** Very Low Miles 94-95

 
artguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Tejas
Posts: 3,298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
great numbers...congrats


j
Old 01-27-03, 10:52 AM
  #57  
Hey, where did my $$$ go?

 
SPOautos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Bimingham, AL
Posts: 4,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Chuck, how are you getting it to read 1.2??? I've tried and mine caps at 1.15!!! I got a 22psi spike on my gauge when trying to tune my boost controller and it only showed 1.15. I know for a fact mine wont go over 1.15 as I've tried. Also I dynoed at 1.14, I leave it there so I know I'm not maxing out the map sensor. On my autometer gauge pluged into the uim I'm getting between 17-18psi on the gauge when my PFC says 1.14

You might want to double check everything with a machanical gauge!!!! It never hurts to double check.

Also, if you dont mind sharing what timing are you running at peak tq? Was this on pump or race fuel?

Also, is this a Dynojet?

Those are some nice numbers!!!!

STEPHEN

Last edited by SPOautos; 01-27-03 at 11:20 AM.
Old 01-27-03, 03:48 PM
  #58  
Senior Member

 
forcefed1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Lynchburg, VA
Posts: 674
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well Im sure impressed. Please tell us more. Care to share more info on your tuning strategy? Have any tricks in timing? what split are you running? What' s your target AFR for say each 1000 RPM?
Old 01-27-03, 06:19 PM
  #59  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
Marshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Edwards, CA
Posts: 1,023
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wow Brian, I and about 50 people I think missed that! thanks.
Old 01-27-03, 07:27 PM
  #60  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
Boostn7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Union, NJ
Posts: 867
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wargasm: No...no....17.5...18psi is ok...

PowerFC did read ~1.14 kg/cm2 but it's not accurate.... boost gauge is higher(17.5)...HKS EVC IV also reflected this...

I thinks Steph is seeing the same difference as I am...

My PowerFC also maxes @ 1.15kg/cm2....and stock map sensor also maxes out.

John
Old 01-27-03, 10:43 PM
  #61  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary


Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
rotaryextreme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Union City, CA
Posts: 3,500
Received 341 Likes on 253 Posts
Hello Stephen, the power FC on my car and on my friend's car are the version 2.0. Maybe that's why. I didn't do anything to the power fc to make it read 1.2 kg/cm2. I also varified with my friend again and he told me he sees 1.15kg/cm2 on his boost gauge. I tried it myself accidentally by running 1.7kg/cm2 and the power fc showed 1.2kg/cm2.

The gas was a mixed of 3/4 91 octane and 1/4 100 octaneERC unleaded.

I did it with a commander so I don't have the map in front of me. Next time when we try to run 19 psi, I will use the datalogit and save the maps.

Yes, it's a dynojet. The 4 wheel one but of course we only use the rear roller. =)

Chuck Huang

Originally posted by SPOautos
Chuck, how are you getting it to read 1.2??? I've tried and mine caps at 1.15!!! I got a 22psi spike on my gauge when trying to tune my boost controller and it only showed 1.15. I know for a fact mine wont go over 1.15 as I've tried. Also I dynoed at 1.14, I leave it there so I know I'm not maxing out the map sensor. On my autometer gauge pluged into the uim I'm getting between 17-18psi on the gauge when my PFC says 1.14

You might want to double check everything with a machanical gauge!!!! It never hurts to double check.

Also, if you dont mind sharing what timing are you running at peak tq? Was this on pump or race fuel?

Also, is this a Dynojet?

Those are some nice numbers!!!!

STEPHEN
Old 01-27-03, 10:54 PM
  #62  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary


Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
rotaryextreme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Union City, CA
Posts: 3,500
Received 341 Likes on 253 Posts
I am not a professinal tuner like some of the guys out there. I am just learning by doing it. But I do have a procedure that I follow.

1. I tune it from rich to lean. First I will enrich the fuel map and then slowly lean it out to the right a/f.

2. When the a/f looks all ok, I will look for dips on the dyno graph. Different rpm requires different a/f to make most power.

3. The last thing I change is the ignition timing.

4. Do a few runs to make sure you get the about the same hp and a/f every run. Sometimes a/f changes even you didn't change the map.

Just make sure all the a/f and timing are within safe range when you tune. Don't get too crazy on it. I tune conservatively because I know a few extra HP is not worth the whole engine rebuild or turbo.

The a/f is shown on the dynosheet at the bottom. I like to tune it to be about 10.5 to low 11.

I will get the maps uploaded to my laptop when I tune his car again running 19 psi. I did the car about 1 month ago so I don't remember all the timing details but it's nothing crazy though.

Chuck Huang

Originally posted by forcefed1
Well Im sure impressed. Please tell us more. Care to share more info on your tuning strategy? Have any tricks in timing? what split are you running? What' s your target AFR for say each 1000 RPM?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cristoDathird
Introduce yourself
28
05-30-19 08:47 PM
msilvia
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
28
04-14-16 12:58 PM
Turblown
Single Turbo RX-7's
0
08-14-15 04:48 PM



Quick Reply: 386.6 rwhp on stock twins! dynosheet posted



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:30 PM.