354HP @11 psi with Dyno sheet
08-18-02, 12:45 AM
#202
Passenger
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by Tim Benton
As KevinK2 ointed out and Artguy just surmised, Ryan's car must indeed have a seemingly larger port. From KevinK2's post:
_____ ernie __ cw __ Rikki
3500.....220.....200...~175
4000.....240.....225......210
Looks like Ryan is down on torque in the lower rpms, before transition.
Looking at an old run of mine where my max rwhp was 321, I made 242ish i torque at 3500 rpms, 242ish again at 4000rpms. Boost level was 12, creeping ever so slightly to 12.2 according to the PFC, stock ports and turbos. So apparently Ryan's is a more peaky engine with a loss in low end power. If that's what he wants, cool, its his car.
Knowing Peter atleast from a consumer stand point who actually drove up there to get Mitch Piper to work on the car back in 96, I would have had alarms going off in my head that when he made the statement not to tell anyone what the A/F ratios were, I'd have thought...why not? Not..."sure Mr. Farrell, I won't tell anyone." Did Peter give a reason as to why since I don't believe he'd ask everyone who was there not to say anything, that's just weird.
Am I paying for a run or two or is Gordon paying it all
Does Reto still run/own the big list?
Tim
As KevinK2 ointed out and Artguy just surmised, Ryan's car must indeed have a seemingly larger port. From KevinK2's post:
_____ ernie __ cw __ Rikki
3500.....220.....200...~175
4000.....240.....225......210
Looks like Ryan is down on torque in the lower rpms, before transition.
Looking at an old run of mine where my max rwhp was 321, I made 242ish i torque at 3500 rpms, 242ish again at 4000rpms. Boost level was 12, creeping ever so slightly to 12.2 according to the PFC, stock ports and turbos. So apparently Ryan's is a more peaky engine with a loss in low end power. If that's what he wants, cool, its his car.
Knowing Peter atleast from a consumer stand point who actually drove up there to get Mitch Piper to work on the car back in 96, I would have had alarms going off in my head that when he made the statement not to tell anyone what the A/F ratios were, I'd have thought...why not? Not..."sure Mr. Farrell, I won't tell anyone." Did Peter give a reason as to why since I don't believe he'd ask everyone who was there not to say anything, that's just weird.
Am I paying for a run or two or is Gordon paying it all
Does Reto still run/own the big list?
Tim
1.) I do not run SEQ. so there is no trans on the turbos.
2.) You pay for the transportation and Gordon will pay for dyno time. And remember you can not have my AFR's. Except on pump fuel.
you guys are really nice to pay for this. thanx in advanc for the kind offerings
-Rikki
08-18-02, 12:59 AM
#203
Passenger
Posts: n/a
My secret sauce is this.
TCA Door is removed, butterfly for the trans is gone, and double throttle butterflys are gone. So it flows real nice and get this you so smart guys you my exhaust ports are not even opened up. They are stock just intake porting There it is my So Secret sauce.....
-Rikki
TCA Door is removed, butterfly for the trans is gone, and double throttle butterflys are gone. So it flows real nice and get this you so smart guys you my exhaust ports are not even opened up. They are stock just intake porting There it is my So Secret sauce.....
-Rikki
08-18-02, 01:24 AM
#205
Rotary Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: CA
Posts: 896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
is it just me, but i heard that you make more power from porting the exhaust rather than the intake? I'm not sure, but i was told that porting of one of them is mcuh more significant than the other.
danny
danny
08-18-02, 01:37 AM
#206
Originally posted by black99
Because first you said Congrats to ryan under one name and then you jumped on under another name and said congrats again. It was just confusing and I don't see why. To make it look like 2 different people? It would at first seem like it, but there's no reason to do that because it doesn't affect anything that I can see. So I was confused.
Yeah we have both been cool in the past, you sold me an ecu, I tried to give you a tip of where to find a gas door. It's cool. I often PM people to tell them about something, even if we've had our differences.
I don't remember the Gordon incident that you're speaking of. However, you can be immature no matter if you're 65 or 25.. I seen no wrong in calling you immature because you're older than me. Which is only by like 2 or 3 years if I'm not mistaken.
I have always been pretty cool with you, 93 R1, and even Ryan. Hell I've admited several times that Ryan knows lots about FD's. Even when trying to set him straight for stuff he says that I don't think is right I always have given him respect by telling him he knows his stuff but he's saying immature things. And I'll admit I've used his site before and I have thanked him for his info.
It pisses me off though to see someone I thought was cool and an smart person making immature comments. At that point it doesn't matter if you are cool to me or not I will jump your case if you start making uneducated assanine remarks about other members. Especially at other respected members that only want to ask questions and receive answers.
Do I now hate you guys? No, not at all. All 3 of you guys are very smart. And again I respect that and you're cool with me. No harm done. But at the same time I'm not afraid to speak up and say when someone is just being a jackass about something by saying comments that have nothing to do with the topic of a thread. Like comments about someones age. Even if they're cool with me.
And I won't jump on the bandwagon and believe something just because I somewhat know someone, or even if they're a friend. I have questions and no matter if they're a friend or not I'd still want to know the answers.
Because first you said Congrats to ryan under one name and then you jumped on under another name and said congrats again. It was just confusing and I don't see why. To make it look like 2 different people? It would at first seem like it, but there's no reason to do that because it doesn't affect anything that I can see. So I was confused.
Yeah we have both been cool in the past, you sold me an ecu, I tried to give you a tip of where to find a gas door. It's cool. I often PM people to tell them about something, even if we've had our differences.
I don't remember the Gordon incident that you're speaking of. However, you can be immature no matter if you're 65 or 25.. I seen no wrong in calling you immature because you're older than me. Which is only by like 2 or 3 years if I'm not mistaken.
I have always been pretty cool with you, 93 R1, and even Ryan. Hell I've admited several times that Ryan knows lots about FD's. Even when trying to set him straight for stuff he says that I don't think is right I always have given him respect by telling him he knows his stuff but he's saying immature things. And I'll admit I've used his site before and I have thanked him for his info.
It pisses me off though to see someone I thought was cool and an smart person making immature comments. At that point it doesn't matter if you are cool to me or not I will jump your case if you start making uneducated assanine remarks about other members. Especially at other respected members that only want to ask questions and receive answers.
Do I now hate you guys? No, not at all. All 3 of you guys are very smart. And again I respect that and you're cool with me. No harm done. But at the same time I'm not afraid to speak up and say when someone is just being a jackass about something by saying comments that have nothing to do with the topic of a thread. Like comments about someones age. Even if they're cool with me.
And I won't jump on the bandwagon and believe something just because I somewhat know someone, or even if they're a friend. I have questions and no matter if they're a friend or not I'd still want to know the answers.
In this lies the inherit problem, You assume that I jumped on somesort of band wagon because I know Ryan. Quite honestly I 've questioned Ryan more than you ever will. Or anyone one on this whole forum for that matter. I also see through most of his BS that you will never even recoginize. So your assumptions about my stance on this are ridicoulous. If you are 3 or 35 years younger than me it's still younger than me reguardless. So for you to call me immature is kinda silly . First off you 've never even met me and know nothing of my life so when you get off your allowance you can critisize me ..OK
You must PM with Gman alot I'm guessing because you have some sort of axe to grind here. I never claimed that you hated me or any Maryland residents but you are pretty quick to give me **** over a freggin screen name. A small point to make in my book. You must have some sort of issue with immaturity because you bring it up alot in your posts. Is that your thing?? BTW why did you claimed to be confused about my 2 screen names you obviously knew it was me right ????
Look man lay off me I've done you no harm and you have no reason to attack me. You are no role model on this forum to look up to so please stop acting so "holier than thou" It's getting old.
No reply is required on your part. be a big boy and let it be if your so mature.
If im being to obtuse for you forgive me I'm three sheets to the wind and 4 long islands past that. I'm rambling now so I'm leaving it at that....
-Dave
08-18-02, 02:59 AM
#208
Lurking..................
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: PA
Posts: 2,220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Fd3BOOST
You obviously don't understand what I said. You don't have to be young to be immature. Being immature(or even mature for that matter) is based on your mentality and your actions. Any smart person would agree with that. I've met very mature 19 y/o's and very immature 30 y/o's..
You've never met me before either, so why would you think I was on allowance? I would hope not, I'm 23 for christ sakes.
Nope, I just don't play well with other kids.
Nope, don't you see it? "Immature, non-sense jargon talking, band wagon jumping, flaming me because I questioned you or your friend forum members" is my "thing".
Secondly, I knew it was you from when you joined under that name(Dr. Strange) when you got banned for a week and were acting like it was some big secret that no one knew who you were.. But I didn't understand the need to congratulate him under 2 different screen names in the same thread. Both posts basically saying the same thing. No harm done though I guess I just didn't understand why you didn't see/remember the other post you wrote while logged on under the other screen name 15 minutes before.
I didn't "attack" you, I never did. Did I have a bunch of commando's storm your house and take over your fort? I merely questioned your actions and you got your panties in a bunch. But that "You don't even own a rx7 anymore do you??" really proved my "immature" theory right as you had enough gall to say that when it had nothing to do with the thread at all.. I was actually trying to be nice.
BTW, I don't think it's immature to try and set things straight(hell jimlab does it all the time ) although it's getting old already.
If you are 3 or 35 years younger than me it's still younger than me reguardless. So for you to call me immature is kinda silly .
First off you 've never even met me and know nothing of my life so when you get off your allowance you can critisize me ..OK
You must PM with Gman alot I'm guessing because you have some sort of axe to grind here.
Nope, I just don't play well with other kids.
Is that your thing?? BTW why did you claimed to be confused about my 2 screen names you obviously knew it was me right ????
Secondly, I knew it was you from when you joined under that name(Dr. Strange) when you got banned for a week and were acting like it was some big secret that no one knew who you were.. But I didn't understand the need to congratulate him under 2 different screen names in the same thread. Both posts basically saying the same thing. No harm done though I guess I just didn't understand why you didn't see/remember the other post you wrote while logged on under the other screen name 15 minutes before.
Look man lay off me I've done you no harm and you have no reason to attack me.
BTW, I don't think it's immature to try and set things straight(hell jimlab does it all the time
) although it's getting old already.
Last edited by black99; 08-18-02 at 03:05 AM.
08-18-02, 08:12 AM
#209
Senior Member
Originally posted by ninetyfourfd3s
The big list has changed hands... I can't recall off hand who took it over, but the address is rx7@rx7-world.net.
The big list has changed hands... I can't recall off hand who took it over, but the address is rx7@rx7-world.net.
Originally posted by T51
I like pizza...
I like pizza...
08-18-02, 10:20 AM
#210
Blow up or win
Originally posted by Dont_Be_A_Rikki
My secret sauce is this.
TCA Door is removed, butterfly for the trans is gone, and double throttle butterflys are gone. So it flows real nice and get this you so smart guys you my exhaust ports are not even opened up. They are stock just intake porting There it is my So Secret sauce.....
-Rikki
My secret sauce is this.
TCA Door is removed, butterfly for the trans is gone, and double throttle butterflys are gone. So it flows real nice and get this you so smart guys you my exhaust ports are not even opened up. They are stock just intake porting There it is my So Secret sauce.....
-Rikki
OK, so I WAS right. It was intake porting. Very clever Rikki!
I think PFS deserves credit for an overlooked mod -
(even though it is basic stuff) I am sure it takes some artistry to do this though, and that's what you pay for in good porting.
OK, now everyone can go spend their hard earned money with PFS! And....quit slammin' this guy - jeeesh.
08-18-02, 10:38 AM
#212
Black99 I knew you couldn't resist. You're so lame.
Nice sectioned comeback but It proves my point ..your just looking for an argument.
I'm happy that you feel old at 23 .
Do you still live at home?
I am just curious.
You still misunderstood most of my post.
Your saying that you can guage somebodys maturity level based on some typed words. Not knowing anything of said person in reality...
I stand by my original statement ..that is silly.Anybody
with half a brain would recognize this. I 'm surprised that your assuming to know anything about me because what I pick and choose to write.
Ofcoarse I don't know you. The comment about your allowance was an insult. Pretty obvious I thought, don't see how you mistook it for anything but.
If your attempt at witty comebacks make you feel better than knock yourself out.
But you still tried to question my second screen name for no good reason. I explained that I couldn't remember the password right away. Sorry that wasn't good enough for you.
Now go write me a novel.
Nice sectioned comeback but It proves my point ..your just looking for an argument.
I'm happy that you feel old at 23 .
Do you still live at home?
I am just curious.
You still misunderstood most of my post.
Your saying that you can guage somebodys maturity level based on some typed words. Not knowing anything of said person in reality...
I stand by my original statement ..that is silly.Anybody
with half a brain would recognize this. I 'm surprised that your assuming to know anything about me because what I pick and choose to write.
Ofcoarse I don't know you. The comment about your allowance was an insult. Pretty obvious I thought, don't see how you mistook it for anything but.
If your attempt at witty comebacks make you feel better than knock yourself out.
But you still tried to question my second screen name for no good reason. I explained that I couldn't remember the password right away. Sorry that wasn't good enough for you.
Now go write me a novel.
Last edited by Fd3BOOST; 08-18-02 at 11:00 AM.
08-18-02, 11:28 AM
#213
Pay for transportation...gas money to and from the dyno? Sure I'll pop for that. As for the A/F ratios, on pump gas would be good info to have along with actual boost pressure made and corrected rwhp made.
My question about the nonsequential set up was the fact that the dyno graph still shows an ocillation at 4500 rpms like it does with sequential set up. If your truly non seq, not just wired open, it shouldn't have that dip and rise effect at 4500. All the other non seq dyno graphs, that I've seen and or saw posted, didn't have it. Just curious as to why its there. It could be a leaner mixture through there and "spiked" the HP up a little or something to that effect since its in between data points and Peter used to add fuel in the surrounding data points in the PMC to try and get rid of the 3K buck. With the wide spread between points, you have a wider margin of error of thing you can't control as well than something with a finer resolution.
Thoughts or ideas as to the dips at the normal transition points.
Tim
My question about the nonsequential set up was the fact that the dyno graph still shows an ocillation at 4500 rpms like it does with sequential set up. If your truly non seq, not just wired open, it shouldn't have that dip and rise effect at 4500. All the other non seq dyno graphs, that I've seen and or saw posted, didn't have it. Just curious as to why its there. It could be a leaner mixture through there and "spiked" the HP up a little or something to that effect since its in between data points and Peter used to add fuel in the surrounding data points in the PMC to try and get rid of the 3K buck. With the wide spread between points, you have a wider margin of error of thing you can't control as well than something with a finer resolution.
Thoughts or ideas as to the dips at the normal transition points.
Tim
08-18-02, 08:47 PM
#216
Rotary Enthusiast
Originally posted by Tim Benton
... My question about the nonsequential set up was the fact that the dyno graph still shows an ocillation at 4500 rpms like it does with sequential set up. If your truly non seq, not just wired open, it shouldn't have that dip and rise effect at 4500..... Tim
... My question about the nonsequential set up was the fact that the dyno graph still shows an ocillation at 4500 rpms like it does with sequential set up. If your truly non seq, not just wired open, it shouldn't have that dip and rise effect at 4500..... Tim
08-19-02, 03:42 PM
#219
Blow up or win
Originally posted by Dont_Be_A_Rikki
WOW I have a 10 page thread. I feel real special. Just in case my time slip is on the 11.9 thread
see ya in the next Rikki thread. What is in store for me next who knows?
WOW I have a 10 page thread. I feel real special. Just in case my time slip is on the 11.9 thread
see ya in the next Rikki thread. What is in store for me next who knows?
What mod will the Rikkster do next?
Who will he antagonize now?
And will we EVER get over the blatant advertising?
(Hey, it's free, damnit!)
Tune in next week for the rest of the story!
(AND BTW, what did I win for guessing correctly it was intake porting. I want my prize, NOW!)
THE END OF THE THREAD IS NEAR...........
08-21-02, 02:54 AM
#220
20B N/A Wide Body FC3S
Originally posted by Tim Benton
Pay for transportation...gas money to and from the dyno? Sure I'll pop for that. As for the A/F ratios, on pump gas would be good info to have along with actual boost pressure made and corrected rwhp made.
My question about the nonsequential set up was the fact that the dyno graph still shows an ocillation at 4500 rpms like it does with sequential set up. If your truly non seq, not just wired open, it shouldn't have that dip and rise effect at 4500. All the other non seq dyno graphs, that I've seen and or saw posted, didn't have it. Just curious as to why its there. It could be a leaner mixture through there and "spiked" the HP up a little or something to that effect since its in between data points and Peter used to add fuel in the surrounding data points in the PMC to try and get rid of the 3K buck. With the wide spread between points, you have a wider margin of error of thing you can't control as well than something with a finer resolution.
Thoughts or ideas as to the dips at the normal transition points.
Tim
Pay for transportation...gas money to and from the dyno? Sure I'll pop for that. As for the A/F ratios, on pump gas would be good info to have along with actual boost pressure made and corrected rwhp made.
My question about the nonsequential set up was the fact that the dyno graph still shows an ocillation at 4500 rpms like it does with sequential set up. If your truly non seq, not just wired open, it shouldn't have that dip and rise effect at 4500. All the other non seq dyno graphs, that I've seen and or saw posted, didn't have it. Just curious as to why its there. It could be a leaner mixture through there and "spiked" the HP up a little or something to that effect since its in between data points and Peter used to add fuel in the surrounding data points in the PMC to try and get rid of the 3K buck. With the wide spread between points, you have a wider margin of error of thing you can't control as well than something with a finer resolution.
Thoughts or ideas as to the dips at the normal transition points.
Tim
08-21-02, 03:00 AM
#221
20B N/A Wide Body FC3S
Originally posted by Dont_Be_A_Rikki
WOW I have a 10 page thread. I feel real special. Just in case my time slip is on the 11.9 thread
see ya in the next Rikki thread. What is in store for me next who knows?
WOW I have a 10 page thread. I feel real special. Just in case my time slip is on the 11.9 thread
see ya in the next Rikki thread. What is in store for me next who knows?
08-21-02, 03:01 AM
#222
WTB** Very Low Miles 94-95
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Tejas
Posts: 3,298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
8x8??? no wonder he blew up that first motor...dood you gotta get a real ecu. you cant play connect the dots like that and hope for perfection. beware.
j
j
08-21-02, 05:47 AM
#223
Passenger
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by Dragon
Quick question... you wouldn't be running STOCK 99+ J-spec turbos on there would you? They are slightly smaller yet flow more air and produce more flow at the range your boosting..
Quick question... you wouldn't be running STOCK 99+ J-spec turbos on there would you? They are slightly smaller yet flow more air and produce more flow at the range your boosting..
-Rikki
08-26-02, 07:22 AM
#224
20B N/A Wide Body FC3S
F&F Baby
Since nobody has been able to explain how Dont_Be_A_Rikki is getting his extra few ponies I did some research and after about 5 min of exploring his engine compartmen with MGI Photosweet I found the secret sauce making those extra few ponies... If you study the top right corner of the engine compartment you will see what I mean...
J/K
I found the secret sauce making those extra few ponies... If you study the top right corner of the engine compartment you will see what I mean... J/K
08-26-02, 07:24 AM
#225
1JZ powered
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Where there's only two seasons, hot and wet! I love Okinawa
Posts: 4,423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: F&F Baby
Originally posted by Dragon
Since nobody has been able to explain how Dont_Be_A_Rikki is getting his extra few ponies I did some research and after about 5 min of exploring his engine compartmen with MGI Photosweet I found the secret sauce making those extra few ponies... If you study the top right corner of the engine compartment you will see what I mean...
J/K
Since nobody has been able to explain how Dont_Be_A_Rikki is getting his extra few ponies I did some research and after about 5 min of exploring his engine compartmen with MGI Photosweet
I found the secret sauce making those extra few ponies... If you study the top right corner of the engine compartment you will see what I mean... J/K