3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

13B or 20B?

Old Nov 15, 2007 | 09:34 PM
  #1  
Ernesto13B's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 0
From: California
13B or 20B?

Ok, im thinking of what kind of engine I would like to buy whenver I decide to build my car up in the future. I always loved the idea of the 20B engine, but it seems quite rare and expensive. I like it caue I love the way it sounds =) and also I LOVE the big increase in torque it has, its just amazing.
I also thought maby it would be better ($ wise) to buy a rebuilt 13B engine and fully build the engine and street port it, ceramic apex seals, the whole 9 yards. Although a 13B wont make as much torque as a 20B and wont sound as nice ( although I still like the sound of my 13B =)
My engine now is fine, im just thinking far in the futrue when I got more money and a better job to modify lol
so.... what do you guys think?
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2007 | 09:42 PM
  #2  
rexhvn's Avatar
Rotary for life!
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,155
Likes: 1
From: Somewhere...
20b is a good project, but very expsensive... and I mean very! I've read that it takes people 15-20k just to build them, excluding running them... and they are very hard to maintain etc... I say 13b... what are you using it for?
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2007 | 09:56 PM
  #3  
Ernesto13B's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 0
From: California
well I plan on using it, for strictly road racing. Im surprisingly not really into drag racing, im more into endurance. Like race it around a track for some laps. I thought about getting an RX8 engine, but I dont think they even have and serious mods for it yet?
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2007 | 10:51 PM
  #4  
fastlinetuning's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: nor cal
there is no substitution for displacment. always go BIG. you cant take money with you when you die.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2007 | 07:41 AM
  #5  
4CN A1R's Avatar
sleeper
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,957
Likes: 3
From: Abbottstown, PA
Originally Posted by fastlinetuning
there is no substitution for displacment. always go BIG. you cant take money with you when you die.
fd's run on money...

id say stick with 13b, there enough hastle as it is
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2007 | 07:50 AM
  #6  
Conv.WS6's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
From: Winchester, VA
if you are thinking about autocross I would stick with the 13b with moderate boost levels for long term reliability just because I don't think the power will be your limiting factor for track times. I would devote your money towards wheels/tires, suspension, and brakes.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2007 | 09:25 AM
  #7  
Zacreth's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: Chandler, AZ
I think the question really is how much money do you want to spend?
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2007 | 10:22 AM
  #8  
NV02's Avatar
Zoom ZooBBRRAAAPPP!!!
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Liked
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 97
Likes: 8
From: Lake Tahoe
I had the same question. I went to the shop I picked to do my engine rebuild and they had a 20b out of its crate, sitting there. 20b's are really big. They convinced me to stay with a well tuned 13b. Cramming that thing into the engine bay, shoving the tranny around, and having it work reliably ( I want a trackable car) didn't seem like it would be worth it. I also wonder how handling is affected with extra weight in front.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2007 | 10:38 AM
  #9  
Mahjik's Avatar
Mr. Links
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 27,595
Likes: 43
From: Kansas City, MO
Originally Posted by NV02
I had the same question. I went to the shop I picked to do my engine rebuild and they had a 20b out of its crate, sitting there. 20b's are really big. They convinced me to stay with a well tuned 13b. Cramming that thing into the engine bay, shoving the tranny around, and having it work reliably ( I want a trackable car) didn't seem like it would be worth it. I also wonder how handling is affected with extra weight in front.
IMO, you aren't going to get a more trackable & reliable FD than one with NA 20B in it. If I could have the track car of my dreams, it would have a ported NA 20B without a doubt.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2007 | 01:22 PM
  #10  
NV02's Avatar
Zoom ZooBBRRAAAPPP!!!
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Liked
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 97
Likes: 8
From: Lake Tahoe
Originally Posted by Mahjik
IMO, you aren't going to get a more trackable & reliable FD than one with NA 20B in it. If I could have the track car of my dreams, it would have a ported NA 20B without a doubt.
Would removing the turbos and plumbing offset the weight of the 20b? Going NA would seem to simplify matters.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2007 | 01:55 PM
  #11  
Mahjik's Avatar
Mr. Links
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 27,595
Likes: 43
From: Kansas City, MO
Originally Posted by NV02
Would removing the turbos and plumbing offset the weight of the 20b? Going NA would seem to simplify matters.
To be honest, I have no idea. However, unless you are building a tube framed purposed built race car; it's not going to matter much.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2007 | 03:42 PM
  #12  
NV02's Avatar
Zoom ZooBBRRAAAPPP!!!
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Liked
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 97
Likes: 8
From: Lake Tahoe
Originally Posted by Mahjik
To be honest, I have no idea. However, unless you are building a tube framed purposed built race car; it's not going to matter much.
A little search goes a long way. Nothing like answering my own question:

https://www.rx7club.com/20b-forum-95/my-rx-7-done-cup-holders-3-rotor-semi-p-port-n-setup-stock-subframe-454580/page5/

I may have to revisit this idea. Having owned an '87 TII and currently an '03 WRX, I long for a wide powerband.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2007 | 08:16 PM
  #13  
Prometheus's Avatar
Still got it.
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,687
Likes: 3
From: Seattle, Washington
https://www.rx7club.com/defined-autoworks-176/defined-autoworks-20b-conversion-kit-644417/

Now that the defined Autoworks 20B drop in kit is available, do you think it would really be in the 15-20K price range.

the product looks pretty good, but then again, I'm still learning.

What are your thoughts on this addition to the 20B conversion world?
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2007 | 06:58 AM
  #14  
str8ryd's Avatar
Nearing Completion...
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (473)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,736
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by sk8erpunk1983
https://www.rx7club.com/showthread.php?t=644417

Now that the defined Autoworks 20B drop in kit is available, do you think it would really be in the 15-20K price range.

the product looks pretty good, but then again, I'm still learning.

What are your thoughts on this addition to the 20B conversion world?

I have the Defined Autoworks subframe kit installed in my car. The fact that Logan made an awesome subframe alternative for the 20B doesn't mean that the costs for the entire project as a whole really come down. His kit is actually more expensive than the subframe conversions available i.e. Pettit, etc. The biggest advantage of the kit is no steering rack modifications and thus no bump-steer issues.


The MOST expensive parts about the conversion are the little things people neglect to think about. Depending on the route you take, a lot of "custom" modifications need to be done. Custom modifications = BIG money!
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2007 | 07:03 AM
  #15  
str8ryd's Avatar
Nearing Completion...
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (473)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,736
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by gmonsen

All that said, the 20b NA route for FD owners is the way to go imho. It costs as much to go single turbo and there you end up with a much more fragile perfromance upgrade. The NA 20b can make 350-375 max rwhp, but has way more torque than any 13bTT and it sounds way better.

Gordon

I figure somewhere down the line I'll be going this route as well. I just love turbo rotary's so I'm having a difficult time deciding when that will be...


Keep us updated on your FD's progress Gordon. I haven't really heard much about your project aside from what I've just read above. G/L with the FD...I'm expecting yours to be one of the nicest ones


Rizwan
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2007 | 10:08 AM
  #16  
celm's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
From: Long Island,NY to Orlando,FL
to bad azda didnt out the 20B from factory in a FD.that would had been sick
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2007 | 10:15 AM
  #17  
NV02's Avatar
Zoom ZooBBRRAAAPPP!!!
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Liked
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 97
Likes: 8
From: Lake Tahoe
Another question for NA 20b installations:

How much heat does it generate? The nearby track for me is in the high desert and is very hot in the summer. I've heard that Corvettes and BMW 335's are overheating. Would a NA 20b run cooler than a 13b? Heat management seems to be the Achilles heel of FD performance mods.

Thanks,

Dave...
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2007 | 10:33 AM
  #18  
str8ryd's Avatar
Nearing Completion...
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (473)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,736
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Heat is virtually a NON-issue with a NA 20B. Heat is mainly a concern when the turbo is put in to the picture. Hope that helps.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2007 | 07:47 PM
  #19  
Ernesto13B's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 0
From: California
How much power can be made with a 20B engine MAX with non turbo? this is quite exciting im gonna do some research.......
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Boans
V-8 Powered RX-7's
3
Sep 25, 2015 04:34 PM
stickmantijuana
20B Forum
9
Sep 22, 2015 07:39 PM
chiefmg
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
2
Sep 10, 2015 07:46 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:56 AM.