3rd Gen General Discussion The place for non-technical discussion about 3rd Gen RX-7s or if there's no better place for your topic

If you had to give up your FD

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 5, 2016 | 12:13 AM
  #1226  
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
Original Gangster/Rotary!
Veteran: Army
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (213)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,814
Likes: 655
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
^Carol, you really need to get into another FD..... pronto
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2016 | 11:45 AM
  #1227  
RA8225's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 7,141
Likes: 46
Probably an M3 or Porsche
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2016 | 10:08 AM
  #1228  
Supernaut's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (83)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 5,859
Likes: 8
From: Los Angeles CA
Originally Posted by ImStillOnJava
I think the platform is pretty affordable to step into now, depending on what you want to start from. I just finished installing and shaking out the kinks for a TVS supercharger install. 270whp on a 1800# chassis
Agreed. Definitely very affordable. Most of the modified ones you see up for sale are well done so buying a modded one actually is a good idea. I wouldn't suggest buying without some form of forced induction. They're also incredibly easy to own and enjoy. I've been having a blast with my elise. Sure the elise isn't as fast as my FD but it is more enjoyable at lower speeds. Best beater ever.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2019 | 06:33 PM
  #1229  
dagoof's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 143
Likes: 6
From: Idaho
What about a BMW Z4 coup?

Maybe with the M package?
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2019 | 10:26 AM
  #1230  
dagoof's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 143
Likes: 6
From: Idaho
Since my wreck, I've been debating about what to replace my car with.

I've thought about a Z4 coupe, a new Miata, a Lotus, or a number of other options.

I can find similar to better performance, and other types of cars can be fun, but I keep coming back to the fact that nothing looks quite as good as an FD RX7. I used to find myself just staring at the curves of the car, and every time I consider something else, I'm almost turned off by the ugly shapes.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2019 | 10:50 AM
  #1231  
NV02's Avatar
Zoom ZooBBRRAAAPPP!!!
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Liked
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 97
Likes: 8
From: Lake Tahoe
Originally Posted by dagoof
Since my wreck, I've been debating about what to replace my car with.

I've thought about a Z4 coupe, a new Miata, a Lotus, or a number of other options.

I can find similar to better performance, and other types of cars can be fun, but I keep coming back to the fact that nothing looks quite as good as an FD RX7. I used to find myself just staring at the curves of the car, and every time I consider something else, I'm almost turned off by the ugly shapes.
That's the thing: as a package, the FD is so hard to beat: styling, tech, performance, uniqueness. I'm intrigued by the C8 Corvette - it looks like it has a lot going for it. But in two years, they'll be *everywhere*. So much for unique. The other issue is I really want a manual transmission. Track days will be few and far between for me, so I want to enjoy the driving experience on public roads. I don't need 5 msec PDK gear changes. Maybe the Cayman?
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2019 | 08:06 AM
  #1232  
BillM's Avatar
RX-7's since 1980
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 801
Likes: 59
From: NYC
Would never get rid of my FD but the new 718 GT4 would be my first choice. Small, light, great handling, power, manual trans, looks good.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2019 | 08:42 AM
  #1233  
j a r o d's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 231
Likes: 16
From: Denver
I'll be selling mine to get a 2022 Corvette depending on how that car shakes out by then.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2019 | 12:08 PM
  #1234  
H_M's Avatar
H_M
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 10 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 626
Likes: 95
From: CanuckVille
After recently owning and driving some of the JDM "Legend" cars I will say that I would choose my FD over my NSX and R32.

NSX
-----
Good:
- steering is sharper and more precise than the FD
- gets much more attention than the FD
- low maintenance (it's a Honda)

Bad:
- not as balanced as the FD.
- not as rewarding to drive or as fun in the twisties
- Interior is tiny and extremely tight
- no soul and feels very bland


R32 GTS-t (not GTR)
------------------------------
Good:
- large interior (very roomy)
- makes a glorious noise

Cons:
- Some pieces are very expensive because of "GTR tax"
- Noticeable front end push from the big RB20
- stock suspension arms offer limited adjustability


It's hard to explain but my FD is just more of an experience than my NSX or R32. When I get everything right, I feel like I'm part of my FD. It's something that I can't explain. I don't get that in the other two.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2019 | 12:36 PM
  #1235  
DaleClark's Avatar
RX-7 Bad Ass
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (56)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,622
Likes: 2,728
From: Pensacola, FL
With the NSX how was it power-wise compared to the FD? I know that's always been one of the downsides with the NSX, it makes OK power but it's pretty much strung out power-wise unless you want to get exotic with superchargers/turbos. Typical NA bolt-ons don't make that much more power.

I've been for a ride in an NSX, never driven one though.

Dale
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2019 | 02:47 PM
  #1236  
gmonsen's Avatar
The Ancient
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,629
Likes: 244
From: Pennsylvania
Agree. Without a supercharger, the NSX's don't really have much power. They handle great and have a nice interior, though. The FD is still my favorite car of all time.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2019 | 03:05 PM
  #1237  
H_M's Avatar
H_M
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 10 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 626
Likes: 95
From: CanuckVille
My FD has about 400whp now and weights around 2700lbs so it's a rocket ship and doesn't compare my naturally aspirated NSX in a straight line.

The NSX by itself has plenty of power. Mine has headers, test pipes, and an exhaust so it's probably pushing around 240whp from the 3L C30A. The V6 is a completely different animal than the high strung four cylinder B and K motors (although I haven't driven a K24 swapped car yet). There is plenty of torque in the lower rev range. On the highway, I can keep it in 5th and have no problem speeding up to pass people. The real magic for spirited driving is the transmission's gearing and how Honda paired it to the engine's power band. Second gear is very long and you'll be going ~130km/h (~82mph) before you reach the 8200rpm fuel cut. This always keeps you in the power band on twisty roads with plenty of room to run. In the FD, I am almost always in third because it keeps me in the power band (second is mostly useless) but I sometimes drop out. During autocross, I find the FD's gearing is mismatched for really tight areas (at least with my single turbo setup) and I have frequently wished for 10-15km more in second gear.

With the same driver and a proper setup I feel my 400whp FD would have a hard time getting away from my 240whp NSX on a very twisty road. But as soon as they'd come to even a little straight stretch, the FD would be gone in the blink of an eye.

All these people saying that the NSX needs 100 more hp are foolish. They are mostly car reviewers that have driven the car for 1-2 hours on a track and not fully experienced it. The power of the NSX is very well paired with it's gearing and perfectly suited to the chassis. It does not need more power.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2019 | 03:33 PM
  #1238  
HiWire's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,561
Likes: 257
From: Toronto
I'd look at getting a 2002 Nissan Silvia Spec-R, as they are being imported into Canada now. RHD would be a nuisance, but I mostly drive my FD out to country roads, away from traffic.



Last edited by HiWire; Oct 25, 2019 at 03:38 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2019 | 07:53 PM
  #1239  
RX7gp's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 274
Likes: 141
From: Pa USA
Originally Posted by BillM
Would never get rid of my FD but the new 718 GT4 would be my first choice. Small, light, great handling, power, manual trans, looks good.
Good choice, but if you're looking to spend about 1/2 the $100K required for a new GT4 would suggest anyone consider a used 981 Cayman S or GTS. Awesome cars to drive, handle great, sound great. Closest thing to an FD I've found for reasonable dollars.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2019 | 12:41 PM
  #1240  
gracer7-rx7's Avatar
needs more track time
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,782
Likes: 802
From: Bay Area CA
I'd probably get a C6 Corvette or ND Miata since there's too much congestion to really use the power of the 'vette - or the FD for that matter... Alternatively, an Aston Martin DB* or a Maserati if I like how they drive.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2019 | 02:24 PM
  #1241  
alexdimen's Avatar
TANSTAFL
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,770
Likes: 128
From: Richmond, Va.
Originally Posted by gracer7-rx7
I'd probably get a C6 Corvette or ND Miata since there's too much congestion to really use the power of the 'vette - or the FD for that matter... Alternatively, an Aston Martin DB* or a Maserati if I like how they drive.
100% agree on city life sucking the fun out of a high power car. Much more happy doing my evening FD drives now that I live in the county.

The NB2 Miata I had for a while was fun anywhere and any time. No stress.

It would probably be an ND or NC Miata for me as well. Cheap, great driving feel, and can kick *** in STR trim at the local autocross with minimal time and $$ investment.
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2022 | 03:48 PM
  #1242  
jhaywood's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 34
Likes: 1
From: Chandler, Arizona
Originally Posted by gracer7-rx7
I'd probably get a C6 Corvette or ND Miata since there's too much congestion to really use the power of the 'vette - or the FD for that matter... Alternatively, an Aston Martin DB* or a Maserati if I like how they drive.
If I had to give up my RX7 then I'd look at a Lotus Evora or Emira, the exige is too small, OR I might build a GT40 replica.
I'd also quite like an Aston Martin Vantage V8 or a Jag F-type R, though these are really GT cars, not sports cars.

Reply
Old Jul 4, 2022 | 04:24 PM
  #1243  
TreeFittySeven's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member: 10 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 840
Likes: 2,410
From: Mom’s basement
No FD here, but for the price they are going and seeing the engineering on a new vette cut away (full car) at a race. No way I would pic an FD over a new vette. Peace.
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2022 | 10:16 PM
  #1244  
c0rbin9's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member: 10 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 781
Likes: 387
From: Houston, TX
Here's my shortlist of lightweight somewhat affordable driver's cars, though it is not very short anymore.

S2000 (tested)*
E30 (tested)*
190E 2.3-16V*
981 cayman
ZD8 BRZ (tested)*
RX8
AW11 MR2*
Alfa Giulietta Spider*
Lotus Elan (S2?)*
FD RX-7 (tested)
Miata (tested)
AE86
NSX
early air-cooled 911 (tested 911sc)
240SX (tested)
944/968 (tested)

If there's one thing I could change about the FD, it would be to make it more responsive. There is a rubberiness to the controls that has been engineered out of more modern sports cars, and I wish there was some way to combine the uncompromised design of a 90s car like the FD, with the engineering and driving characteristics of a more modern car. Performance upgrades like coilovers, larger wheels, and big brakes get you part of the way there, but a lot of the precision feel comes from the stiffness that is baked into the chassis, so there is only so much you can do with a 30 year old design. I recently had a new BRZ for 24 hours and was blown away with how it performed on a backroad. There are things about it that disqualify it for me as a long term keeper, but it has me looking at newer cars in a different light, and I'm thinking about trying to pick up an RX-8 as a second car.
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2022 | 10:47 PM
  #1245  
BLUE TII's Avatar
Rotary Motoring
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 8,479
Likes: 934
From: CA
If only there were ways to stiffen the FD...
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2022 | 12:11 PM
  #1246  
Federighi's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 10 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 446
Likes: 163
From: California
Worked for independent Honda / Acura and then later a dealer for some time. Drove na1 and na2 and considered buying na2 before covid. K swap is seriously sacrilegious. Crazy what people say and do these days...

E39 m5 was a great all around daily and grocery getting vehicle. I also think the could Rx8 appeal to a post-FD owner depending on what they're looking for and is a little gem that most enthusiasts generally sleep on imo in its' own right.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2022 | 09:30 AM
  #1247  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,851
Likes: 3,239
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally Posted by c0rbin9
190E 2.3-16V*
i had a regular 190E 2.6 for a while. it has some potential. its very quiet inside, its really on par with modern cars here. it rides really well too. its very soft, so it moves around a lot, but handling is still quite good.

the bad part is the drive train, which the 2.3-16v hopefully would fix. the engine makes no power anywhere, its CIS injection which sucks. the Mercedes automatic is unfathomably bad, its a 4 speed, and its starts in second, and then there is no overdrive, so its either bogging or revving sky high. it just makes no sense, why have a 4 speed and then only use 3? the manual trans Mercedes i've driven have been worse...

oh and its got the Mercedes quality, so you need the sticker that says "the parts falling off of this car were made with pride in West Germany"

that being said though the car is not some giant land yacht, and its got this everyman quality, you can take it anywhere and its welcome. if i did another it would get a Rotary (i've seen it) or one of the bigger Mercedes engines, the M103 came in a 3 liter, and that would literally bolt right in

Reply
Old Jul 10, 2022 | 12:34 PM
  #1248  
c0rbin9's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member: 10 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 781
Likes: 387
From: Houston, TX
Originally Posted by j9fd3s
i had a regular 190E 2.6 for a while. it has some potential. its very quiet inside, its really on par with modern cars here. it rides really well too. its very soft, so it moves around a lot, but handling is still quite good.

the bad part is the drive train, which the 2.3-16v hopefully would fix. the engine makes no power anywhere, its CIS injection which sucks. the Mercedes automatic is unfathomably bad, its a 4 speed, and its starts in second, and then there is no overdrive, so its either bogging or revving sky high. it just makes no sense, why have a 4 speed and then only use 3? the manual trans Mercedes i've driven have been worse...

oh and its got the Mercedes quality, so you need the sticker that says "the parts falling off of this car were made with pride in West Germany"

that being said though the car is not some giant land yacht, and its got this everyman quality, you can take it anywhere and its welcome. if i did another it would get a Rotary (i've seen it) or one of the bigger Mercedes engines, the M103 came in a 3 liter, and that would literally bolt right in
That's funny, I had a regular 190E 2.6 as well. It was basically like an S-class in a smaller package in terms of the quality and the way it rode. The multi-link rear suspension was a work of art, and Mercedes spent more developing that alone than some manufacturers spend on an entire model.

I still have a special place in my heart for Mercedes, as the quality and depth of engineering is on a different level, and is something you have to experience first hand to understand. The Euro 190E 2.3-16Vs were much sportier than the ones we got over here, as they were lighter and had higher compression more powerful engines. That said, there is a lot of luxury baked into even the Cosworth models, and it would take a lot of work to get the steering and shift action in particular to not feel like a bus. Personally, I like my Mercedes full grandma spec automatic, and wouldn't mind wafting along in a carved-from-granite piece of German engineering, a W123...


Reply
Old Jul 10, 2022 | 12:37 PM
  #1249  
Natey's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,496
Likes: 1,484
From: West Coast
Miata Club or GR86 are about the only two that don't cost an arm and a baby's leg. New anyway.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2022 | 08:35 AM
  #1250  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,851
Likes: 3,239
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally Posted by Natey
Miata Club.
the 2022 ND Clubs have been sold out for months, and you'd need to wait until the 2023's which is September.

that being said the club just adds the option to have the Brembo front calipers and Recaro seats (in the US), so if the GT seats work, then that would be the exact same thing.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:05 AM.