2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

wrong gas

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 16, 2011 | 09:21 AM
  #26  
GSfc3s's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: Portland
YUP RR88 is correct. 87 saves MPG and performance on all BONE STOCK 13b motors!
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2011 | 10:22 AM
  #27  
RotaryRocket88's Avatar
Top Down, Boost Up
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,718
Likes: 6
From: San Diego, CA
Originally Posted by Pele
I thought you said everything was stock!
This is exactly how I read it. Replacing the stock exhaust with aftermarket parts no longer makes the car stock.

Unfortunately even a small boost spike can lead to detonation without proper fuel modifications.

Last edited by RotaryRocket88; Mar 16, 2011 at 10:25 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2011 | 05:21 PM
  #28  
canonize-ryda's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
From: wyoming
so no engine just like that because of the turbo pushed too much air and not enough gas into the chamber?
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2011 | 05:50 PM
  #29  
Evil Aviator's Avatar
Rotorhead
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 39
From: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Originally Posted by evil aviator
stock = how it came from the factory. Once you start screwing with the boost level...
^
r.i.f.
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2011 | 06:13 PM
  #30  
84stock's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,547
Likes: 12
From: calgary
Man I would have bucked up and dumped a gallon of toluene or a couple bottles of octane boost in right away if i was that concerned.

$4000 mistake....ouch
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2011 | 06:39 PM
  #31  
slitherz90gxl's Avatar
Resident Rotard
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
From: Belleville, Illinois
Another reason for me to stay n/a.
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2011 | 08:39 PM
  #32  
canonize-ryda's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
From: wyoming
lol ive been looking for a turbo but my luck driving outa the parking lot i buy it in it will detonate....
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2011 | 08:25 PM
  #33  
walken's Avatar
Registered Loser
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,224
Likes: 0
From: Whiterock
even if you had 91 in there it would have popped anyway. you can't over boost without the proper mods.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2011 | 08:57 PM
  #34  
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
Sharp Claws
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 50
From: Central Florida
Originally Posted by hvaltierra
so heres an update car actually got about 50miles more out of the tank with the mixed gas. only prob now is ive been overboosting for a bit and today i gave it a little to much pedal in third and ping ping boom. now i need a rebuild sucks *** to beacuse this motor only had about 30k on the rebuild now. :0(
man....

i was reading this and reading all the shitty replies hoping i could get in a response before something such as this happened.

i have thoroughly tested the US market gas grades in rotary applications and 87 octane is only good for about 8 psi of boost before you will start noticing alarming amounts of knock from the engine. add in the variable of mixed gas unknowns and it was a bad idea to push even stock boost levels on a car with freeflowing exhaust.

i tested the values due to commuting about 150 miles per day to save on fuel as it was about $4/gallon during the start of the war several years back. now that fuel price is standard but i have no choice in low grade fuels as i now have about twice the horsepower as i did then.

even with 91 octane it will buy you a bit more knock resistance but the AFRs from the stock fuel system will generally start to lean out at around 10psi, just an FYI. if you were pushing 8+ psi on 87 then bad idea, if you were pushing more than 10psi on the stock fuel system, also bad idea. combine the 2 and you have a guaranteed dead motor.

i have even had customers lie to me, claiming to run 91 octane. when i could audibly hear their engine detonating at 9-10psi i could tell them otherwise.

Last edited by RotaryEvolution; Mar 17, 2011 at 09:06 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2011 | 09:31 PM
  #35  
bumpstart's Avatar
talking head
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,775
Likes: 15
From: Perth, WA, OZ
Originally Posted by Karack
man....

i was reading this and reading all the shitty replies hoping i could get in a response before something such as this happened.

i have thoroughly tested the US market gas grades in rotary applications and 87 octane is only good for about 8 psi of boost before you will start noticing alarming amounts of knock from the engine. add in the variable of mixed gas unknowns and it was a bad idea to push even stock boost levels on a car with freeflowing exhaust.

i tested the values due to commuting about 150 miles per day to save on fuel as it was about $4/gallon during the start of the war several years back. now that fuel price is standard but i have no choice in low grade fuels as i now have about twice the horsepower as i did then.

even with 91 octane it will buy you a bit more knock resistance but the AFRs from the stock fuel system will generally start to lean out at around 10psi, just an FYI. if you were pushing 8+ psi on 87 then bad idea, if you were pushing more than 10psi on the stock fuel system, also bad idea. combine the 2 and you have a guaranteed dead motor.

i have even had customers lie to me, claiming to run 91 octane. when i could audibly hear their engine detonating at 9-10psi i could tell them otherwise.
and what is shitty about this reply? i rather think i hit the nail on the head

even though i dont experience your fuel grades i gave my warning on what i think of an 86 combined RON/MON

and left it to the OP to prudently keep out of it while on the low octane

Originally Posted by bumpstart
when i was in colledge i had a lecturer explain exactly what happens when you blend two octanes to a perfect 50/50 ratio
the result is not as expected,, and the discussion on the matter was lively
( i will point out this bloke was teaching us the petroleum industry processes )

i was at that point advocating what you wrote,, but apparently it is not so ,, and the reasons complicated

( something to do with hydrogen bonding / van der waals ratios )

for the OP,, it will not matter that much,, drive it for a short distance conservatively ,, and refill with your normal choice


where i am in western austraila,, octane is rated in RON ,, and so the numbers don't co-relate with your grades
-- however,, on any aftermarket tuned rotary,, using the standard 91 RON
( about 86 combined ron/mon )
can be engine lethal in hot ( 100 F + ) conditions

here,, the better tuners tune for 8/10's cause the petrol quality from the pump can vary in hot conditions
- pulling 2 degrees out of the optimum timing is considered normal practice
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2011 | 12:11 AM
  #36  
hvaltierra's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 124
Likes: 3
From: Arcadia, Ca
ya it was a combo of the two i had already been having overboost issues when i ran 91 but then i had the 87 mix in there and was behind a slow driver got impatient and gunned it and boom but eh you live and learn. so does anyone reccommend a rebuild kit. i was looking into super seals. also can i run the a factory ecu with a street port not going for any huge hp numbers just a fun daily. thinking of also upgrading the injectors to some 720's of course the fuel pump and def that fcd. eventually gonna get the rtek and a bnr but prob not till next tax season.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Medevack1
Naturally Aspirated Performance Forum
13
Nov 10, 2017 04:53 PM
FC_DREAMS
General Rotary Tech Support
20
Sep 22, 2015 09:43 PM
The1Sun
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
7
Sep 18, 2015 07:13 PM
The1Sun
New Member RX-7 Technical
5
Sep 15, 2015 04:45 PM
The1Sun
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
0
Sep 7, 2015 10:21 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:34 AM.