will stock turbo handle bridgport ?
02-18-03, 09:33 PM
#1
Rotary Freak
Thread Starter
will stock turbo handle bridgport ?
Or streetport ? Because the engine will spin 10k rpms soo wondering if I will get any benifit ? or will I burn up the turbo ?
02-18-03, 09:57 PM
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: West Covina, CA
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
do a search pls.
https://www.rx7club.com/forum/showth...ridgeport+port
and a quote from No7Yet (hey brandon, i have the car running perfectly now! http://photos.yahoo.com/kep0ne/ )
I wouldn't recommend it, unless you enjoy...
- blowing engines every 30k
- blowing 5k on each engine
- not making ANY torque
- not making ANY useable power below about 4000 RPM
- being heard coming a mile and a half away (LOUD!!!)
- idling at 1.5-2k RPM
- getting 10-12 MPG
- cruising around at 5k like a motorcycle (well, that sounds pretty cool, but...)
- overheating if you don't continually drive the car
So, no, I wouldn't recommend it And no, with a bridgeport there's WAAAAY too much overlap for forced induction - you'd be blowing your intake charge straight out the exhaust ports
Brandon
__________________
https://www.rx7club.com/forum/showth...ridgeport+port
and a quote from No7Yet (hey brandon, i have the car running perfectly now! http://photos.yahoo.com/kep0ne/ )
I wouldn't recommend it, unless you enjoy...
- blowing engines every 30k
- blowing 5k on each engine
- not making ANY torque
- not making ANY useable power below about 4000 RPM
- being heard coming a mile and a half away (LOUD!!!)
- idling at 1.5-2k RPM
- getting 10-12 MPG
- cruising around at 5k like a motorcycle (well, that sounds pretty cool, but...)
- overheating if you don't continually drive the car
So, no, I wouldn't recommend it And no, with a bridgeport there's WAAAAY too much overlap for forced induction - you'd be blowing your intake charge straight out the exhaust ports
Brandon
__________________
02-18-03, 10:27 PM
#4
I'm a boost creep...
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Originally posted by kep0ne
...with a bridgeport there's WAAAAY too much overlap for forced induction - you'd be blowing your intake charge straight out the exhaust ports
...with a bridgeport there's WAAAAY too much overlap for forced induction - you'd be blowing your intake charge straight out the exhaust ports
Von, the question is not whether you can do it with the stock turbo, but rather why would you bother. You'd get better results spending less money on an upgraded turbo.
Trending Topics
02-18-03, 10:56 PM
#8
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,832
Received 2,603 Likes
on
1,847 Posts
Originally posted by Scott 89t2
the stock turbo is too small for the stock ports... let alone anything else.
the stock turbo is too small for the stock ports... let alone anything else.
mike
02-19-03, 12:54 AM
#9
Full Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hmmm I don't remember any of those drawbacks when i had my bridgeport, apart from the fuel economy 
Why do people insist that you have to cruise at 5000rpm and they have no torque??
As far as the standard turbo goes, I went to a circuit race meeting recently and there was a relatively quick Rx-4 there (not as quick as the 2 1st gen rx-7's, one was a 13b bridge and one was a 13b turbo). I assumed it was just a bridgeport, but when I had a look under the bonnet it had a stock turbo on it aswell. It obviously worked (it wasn't slow by any stretch), but I think the turbo is far too restrictive.
Mat
Why do people insist that you have to cruise at 5000rpm and they have no torque?? As far as the standard turbo goes, I went to a circuit race meeting recently and there was a relatively quick Rx-4 there (not as quick as the 2 1st gen rx-7's, one was a 13b bridge and one was a 13b turbo). I assumed it was just a bridgeport, but when I had a look under the bonnet it had a stock turbo on it aswell. It obviously worked (it wasn't slow by any stretch), but I think the turbo is far too restrictive.
Mat
Can anyone help?
02-19-03, 04:54 AM
#11
I'm a boost creep...
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Originally posted by mdouble
I don't remember any of those drawbacks when i had my bridgeport, apart from the fuel economy Why do people insist that you have to cruise at 5000rpm and they have no torque??
I don't remember any of those drawbacks when i had my bridgeport, apart from the fuel economy
Why do people insist that you have to cruise at 5000rpm and they have no torque??
02-19-03, 11:27 AM
#13
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,832
Received 2,603 Likes
on
1,847 Posts
Originally posted by mdouble
Hmmm I don't remember any of those drawbacks when i had my bridgeport, apart from the fuel economy
Hmmm I don't remember any of those drawbacks when i had my bridgeport, apart from the fuel economy
its a 13b bridge with over 40k on it, it had more low rpm grunt than my gsl-se is quiet and got mid 20's mpg on the way to sevenstock. the only drawback was part throttle under 4k.....
mike
