2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

Who's Faster???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-31-03, 02:01 AM
  #1  
Hooray For Boobies!!!

Thread Starter
 
RotorJoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Washington
Posts: 3,570
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Wink Who's Faster???

Who is fsater, the 13b fuel injected 1st gen or the N/A (only) 13b's (S4 and S5) 2nd Gens?? Sorry I was not sure where to post this, and I think the 13b 1st gen people follow some of these threads. I own one of each and I think the 1st gen is about a 1/2 second quicker (g-tech Pro).
Old 01-31-03, 02:08 AM
  #2  
Boost Addict

iTrader: (3)
 
nashman69g's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Metairie, LA near new orleans
Posts: 1,898
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts
I not sure but the g-tech Pro has more error probability than the regular g-tech due to the fact u have to enter the exact vehicle weight and rpm range....I've had lots of experience with them...the regular g-tech is about a .7 secs off---where the Pro ranges depending on your inputs.....the track is the real way of telling!!!!!
just my $0.02!!
Old 01-31-03, 02:17 AM
  #3  
SOLD THE RX-7!

 
Scott 89t2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 7,451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1st gen
Old 01-31-03, 08:15 AM
  #4  
Shelby Tuner & FC badass

 
GLHS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Seminole, Florida
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Do both cars have to be stock?
Old 01-31-03, 08:33 AM
  #5  
male stripper

iTrader: (1)
 
jeremy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: St Petersburg, FL
Posts: 3,131
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
gsl-se has the quickest 1/4 out of all na's.
Old 01-31-03, 11:53 AM
  #6  
stop stealing my avatar

 
Mark'sMazda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Canton MI
Posts: 825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
what's the GSL-SE run??
Old 01-31-03, 12:52 PM
  #7  
Shelby Tuner & FC badass

 
GLHS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Seminole, Florida
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The 13B 1st gen runs 16.04 @ 85

The 13B 2nd gen runs 15.9 @ 88
Old 01-31-03, 01:44 PM
  #8  
male stripper

iTrader: (1)
 
jeremy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: St Petersburg, FL
Posts: 3,131
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
http://www.missouri.edu/~apcb20/times.html

1979 Mazda RX-7 GS 9.2 17.0
1982 Mazda RX-7 GSL 9.7 N/A
1983 Mazda RX-7 GS 9.5 17.0
1984 Mazda RX-7 GSL-SE 7.8 15.9
1985 Mazda RX-7 GSL 9.9 17.4
1986 Mazda RX-7 GXL 8.5 16.5
1987 Mazda RX-7 Turbo 6.6 15.2
1988 Mazda RX-7 Conv. 9.7 17.5
1989 Mazda RX-7 GTU 8.5 16.5
1989 Mazda RX-7 Turbo 6.7 15.1
1990 Mazda RX-7 GTU 8.6 16.7
1990 Mazda RX-7 Turbo II 6.3 14.9
1991 Mazda RX-7 Conv. 8.8 16.7
1991 Mazda RX-7 Infini IV 7.0 14.9
1993 Mazda RX-7 5.5 14.0
1993 Mazda RX-7 R1 5.3 13.9
1994 Mazda RX-7 5.3 14.0
1994 Mazda RX-7 Touring 6.0 14.5
1995 Mazda RX-7 R2 5.3 14.1


glhs is afraid a 1st gen is faster:p.
Old 01-31-03, 02:02 PM
  #9  
Taint Stain

 
Droptoprx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Lake Meade, Pa
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My rather modded '88 'vert can take my best boy's GSL-SE with an intake and no emmission crap. Maybe because I have a little more experience driving rotaries or maybe the extra mods. Dunno which, but my 13b get's to the finish line before his 1st gen 13b. Just my experience.
Old 01-31-03, 02:09 PM
  #10  
Senior Member

 
DAN CARWIN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: COLORADO
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
there is no way that chart is accurate. a 89 GTU is slower in qtr mile than a 86 GXL. give me a break. the GTU is lighter with 15 more hp stock. some one better do more research.
Old 01-31-03, 02:13 PM
  #11  
root

 
zyounker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah, some of these #s looks suspect..


Anyway the GSL-SE 1st gen is the fastest NA RX-7.. it was the fastest until the TII came out.

I believe the GSL-SE was ~15.9, that part does seem right..



-Zach
Old 01-31-03, 02:15 PM
  #12  
I'll have a Coke!

 
Phu5ion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Golden, CO
Posts: 565
Received 6 Likes on 2 Posts
Stock vs. stock... GSL-SE should be faster because they are a lot lighter than pretty much any 2nd-gen. But it would probably come down to the driver because there is also a power difference too.
Old 01-31-03, 02:36 PM
  #13  
I HATE sleepy eyes

 
BoostedRotors's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 1,180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GSL-SE...bad little cars. They are the Turbo II and GTUs of the 1st gen world.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
toplessFC3Sman
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
6
03-20-18 01:54 PM
cooldude
West RX-7 Forum
5
10-03-15 09:17 PM
23Racer
Race Car Tech
1
09-21-15 10:48 AM



Quick Reply: Who's Faster???



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:09 AM.