2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

What's your benchmark?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-14-08, 05:36 PM
  #26  
RX-7 DISCIPLE

iTrader: (1)
 
Ex-Eg-Driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NorCal,California
Posts: 1,039
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Benchmarks

Handling - 350Z

Power - NC Miata
Old 03-14-08, 05:47 PM
  #27  
Former FC enthusiast

iTrader: (2)
 
KhanArtisT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 2,841
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
An S2000 with the same modifications as an FC will always be faster due to having a more modern suspension design. As for out performing just a stock one, DIYMAN25 here built an FB that had basic suspension modifications, was N/A and ran faster than a stock S2000 driven by some pro Japanese driver on his local track (buttonwillow I think).

My goal is also to outperform a stock S2000, but its far as I'm attending college and working part time. Right now its more like getting in track time, mastering driving, then suspension, wheel, tires, brakes and finally the powertrain.

And the first reply is retarded, it will still cost less than the initial price of an S2000. The reason I chose an older car is my fascination of RX7s, the fact that it will be cheaper (shows people they don't need 25k+ to get into road racing), and the challenge of using a 20 year old suspension design against modern sports cars.

Last edited by KhanArtisT; 03-14-08 at 05:52 PM.
Old 03-14-08, 05:55 PM
  #28  
6 Speed FC

iTrader: (2)
 
Brismo7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Orange, CA
Posts: 2,258
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Black91n/a
I was talking about new wheels and tires mostly. It's not that often that some really nice wheels or tires come up for those sort of prices. Some stuff that's more commonly available like Mustang 17x8's are cheap, but heavy, something like a really light Enkei RP-F1 will set you back $1k. Good, new tires will also run you well over $400 new, unless maybe you're getting 15's and the tires are on sale.
Whats wrong with used/on sale items? Be smart when purchasing items. I've recently learned of a parts source that is unbelievably cheap, and VERY qaulity. Almost every single part on my car was bought second hand. the only things brand new, were the bushings, oils, filers, and radiator. literally. oh and some hardware.

Originally Posted by Black91n/a
Basically to do what you're talking about you have to be very vigilent looking for stuff and get a bit lucky at the same time.
Hence the Keep your eyes wide open and have cash readily available. Other than finding prices and gauging for future cost/expenses. Should you really be parts shopping with no money


Originally Posted by Black91n/a
The OP also needs to consider the other costs, like shipping and handling on EVERYTHING and stuff like mounting and balancing and install costs if they're not doing it themselves.
Yep. my bushing install from a shop, including other minor services cost me almost $900. That is a lesson i learned. When i do it again, i will have the proper tools and save me that cash.

Originally Posted by Black91n/a
Your performance goal of beating a new GTR is basically 100% unrealistic. They're insanely fast.


Why?
my car is pretty damn fast to. I think your 100% close minded on the situation

Last edited by Brismo7; 03-14-08 at 06:06 PM.
Old 03-14-08, 07:27 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Rotary_Powerd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Boston MA
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Brismo7
Whats wrong with used/on sale items? Be smart when purchasing items.....
Yep. my bushing install from a shop, including other minor services cost me almost $900. That is a lesson i learned. When i do it again, i will have the proper tools and save me that cash.

Why?
my car is pretty damn fast to. I think your 100% close minded on the situation
used parts save money. We're going off topic but..... as for the GTR, FC+FULL suspension+Light wheels+super sticky tires+ LS4+ LSD+ Aero bits+holy water. Anything is possible.
Old 03-14-08, 07:41 PM
  #30  
Senior Member

 
Healing's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Seattle
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Benchmark - something that can be used for daily driving, and drift days.

Ideally:
Full Tamon design aero
Full interior, but perhaps with a 4 pt roll cage
Stock LS1/LS2

But only if I kept my car for that long. I might just end up selling it and buying a truck. And a 125cc shifter. Or maybe just an S2000 altogether.
Old 03-14-08, 09:00 PM
  #31  
Former FC enthusiast

iTrader: (2)
 
KhanArtisT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 2,841
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Rotary_Powerd
used parts save money. We're going off topic but..... as for the GTR, FC+FULL suspension+Light wheels+super sticky tires+ LS4+ LSD+ Aero bits+holy water. Anything is possible.
MAAYBE a stock GTR with the factory tires...thats still pushing it. It still depends on what type of course though, maybe a low speed twisty course, but a high speed track like the nurburgring I think the GTR would win...doesn't prove anything IMO. A fully built stripped FC on slicks outruns a stock GTR that can be driven to work everyday

Originally Posted by phoenix7
I love noobies. They're always coming in here in their slow 80's mobiles trying to beat faster, newer cars.

What happened to the days when people bought cars so they could enjoy driving? NOw a days it seems like people buy cars so they can beat this other newer, faster car. My goal is to beat this, or beat that or kill this. I guess everyone has SOMETHING to prove and cars helps them prove it. I thought this thread had potential.
An FC with its shitty interior and old school styling is a performance bargain...the only part of driving you should "enjoy" is outperforming cars that cost more to buy. For pure driving pleasure I'd much rather own something European. Just my .02 though, I guess some people are more competitive than others.
Old 03-14-08, 09:02 PM
  #32  
rotorhead

iTrader: (3)
 
arghx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: cold
Posts: 16,182
Received 429 Likes on 263 Posts
benchmark? C6 Z06, especially in terms of straightline performance and power output. With my T04S turbo and supporting mods (and a 55 gallon drum of race gas at my house) I'll be close to that once I get a little more money together for an AVC-R boost controller. I may not have enough turbo though, although I have everything else I need (fuel, standalone, etc). I have decent handling mods too. bushings, non adjustable springs and shocks, sway bars. Just need better tires and eventually coilovers.

The only thing I have to prove is that I can tune this myself, by learning from my own mistakes and the mistakes of others. And if I blow the motor, well, fine. It's got s4 irons anyway, it's bound to pop.

Last edited by arghx; 03-14-08 at 09:10 PM.
Old 03-14-08, 09:46 PM
  #33  
Technician

iTrader: (1)
 
lax-rotor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,008
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Bench Mark:
My local CarClub... They're Scary FAST.
Old 03-14-08, 10:55 PM
  #34  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Rotary_Powerd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Boston MA
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by KhanArtisT
MAAYBE a stock GTR with the factory tires...thats still pushing it. It still depends on what type of course though, maybe a low speed twisty course, but a high speed track like the nurburgring I think the GTR would win...doesn't prove anything IMO. A fully built stripped FC on slicks outruns a stock GTR that can be driven to work everyday
hence the holy water reference, I meant it was very unlikely.

Oh and I love my car as is, but there is always room for improvement.
Old 03-14-08, 11:12 PM
  #35  
Full Member

 
SE7ENS_GARAGE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
my benchmark is my 1990 infini FC rx7 in my GT4 garage, 4** whp, 4** wtq...and i wana be able to switch settings from suspension to downforce using my ps2 controller...and of course that awesome 400 some odd mpg while constantly redlining every turn

on a serious note: i like how the OP put some thought to his mods, unlike some folks who strap on just about anythin
Old 03-14-08, 11:55 PM
  #36  
Senior Member

 
Healing's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Seattle
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by phoenix7
damn, you're all over the place, you've clearly thought it all through. I like your last idea though.
Yeah, well, cars are bad enough investments as it is already. They're an even worse investment when you start putting money into older cars O_o

FCs are great cars, but its hard to be closed minded when there are so many other great cars out there.

Oh, and to OP, if you want to be competitive with an S2000, you should definitely rethink progressive springs and HPs. Ewwwwwww
Old 03-15-08, 11:21 AM
  #37  
Lives on the Forum

 
Black91n/a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 5,707
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Rotary_Powerd
(Diff)OBX FTW, Yes I have the money, but I'm still somewhat cheap. I was a poor undergraduate not to long ago some habits die hard. I'll look in your FD LSD suggestion

(Brakes) I won't be tracking TOO often I don't see the need.
I wouldn't trust the OBX diff as far as I could throw it. It's a whole system of inherently weak gears, and the only way they last a long time and can handle abuse is if they're built very well. Cheap stuff like OBX will not be made to the same standards and will not be as reliable or as strong. Spend the money on the good stuff. If you're planning on keeping the NA rear end, then a Miata torsen fits, the FD torsen fits the TII diff.

It's not about how often you track the car, it's about how it's driven when you're there. Some tracks are really hard on brakes and will fade race pads and fluid on stock cars. Other tracks are more forgiving. Don't count on street pads being ok. I've seen people at the track fighting braking issues all weekend and having to miss sessions and generally having a crappy time because they're on street pads. You'll also need to be sure that you've got fresh high temp fluid in the system.
Old 03-15-08, 12:06 PM
  #38  
pwned

 
dean23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern Indiana
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
im looking for a car with power in the 6lbs/hp range. so ill need power in the mid 5's to get that to the wheels. if i can get my cars weight down to around 2700lbs, ill need 450hp at the crank to accomplish my goal. all i REALLY need is a bigger turbo with some custom headers and a DP, and more fuel. suspension will be upgraded even more than it is now, and ill need some much wider tires, so that calls for some body work too. ill wait till i have around 10k to play wit ths project.
Old 03-15-08, 01:18 PM
  #39  
Lives on the Forum

 
Black91n/a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 5,707
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Brismo7
Why?
my car is pretty damn fast to. I think your 100% close minded on the situation
I didn't say it can't be done, it's just unrealistic to expect that a tuned FC could soundly beat it. You'd need at minimum 400+hp, and probably V8 torque, hugely wide, very sticky tires, widebody, high end suspension set up by professionals, and so on. Basically a fully race prepped car. You may think your car's fast, but I can guarantee you it's not even close.
Old 03-15-08, 01:40 PM
  #40  
Canned. I got CORNED!

iTrader: (5)
 
The Shaolin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Appleton, WI
Posts: 1,029
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If I needed a big dyno number or a fast timeslip to be happy, I wouldn't have bought this car, I would buy a 5.0 mustang just like everyone else and be boring with it.

I bought this car because I've always been fascinated with the rotary...I just want to have fun with it. That's my "benchmark".
Old 03-15-08, 03:12 PM
  #41  
6 Speed FC

iTrader: (2)
 
Brismo7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Orange, CA
Posts: 2,258
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Black91n/a
You'd need at minimum 400+hp, and probably V8 torque
How dare you insult my Rx7 by even mentioning big heavy 1950's american technology! Why would i want a tractor motor?




oh nevermind. i forgot about the ls1 residing in my engine bay...

Like i said, i have roughly 280RWHP on my bone stock engine. 400hp is roughly 1500 dollars and a tune away.


Originally Posted by Black91n/a
You may think your car's fast, but I can guarantee you it's not even close.
eh, your most likely right
Old 03-15-08, 11:09 PM
  #42  
Rotary Powered Since 1995

iTrader: (4)
 
daviddeep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Potomac, MD
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by The Shaolin
If I needed a big dyno number or a fast timeslip to be happy, I wouldn't have bought this car, I would buy a 5.0 mustang just like everyone else and be boring with it.

I bought this car because I've always been fascinated with the rotary...I just want to have fun with it. That's my "benchmark".
My thoughts exactly. I've been driving FCs for 12+ years now because I like them. Yeah, there are plenty of 21st Century cars that are faster or better in some way, and that is fine with me. If I really wanted that, I'd sell the FC and start saving for a 350Z, Boxster, S2000, or whatever.

Still, it is fun to squeeze a little extra performance out of the old technology without completely changing the character of the car. I guess I'd say my performance benchmark is to improve a little on what the car could do stock when it was new in the 80s. In the meantime, I enjoy it because it is a 20 year old car, not in spite of this. I like the roll-up windows, the 80s-futuristic interior, the outdated flip-up lights, etc. FCs are cool.
Old 03-15-08, 11:16 PM
  #43  
Senior Member

 
Healing's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Seattle
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Brismo7
oh nevermind. i forgot about the ls1 residing in my engine bay...

Like i said, i have roughly 280RWHP on my bone stock engine. 400hp is roughly 1500 dollars and a tune away.
I bet you get so much traction on those stock TII wheels
Your LS1 looks like its mounted a lot lower than other LS1 swaps I've seen, what kit are you using? Or maybe it's just me. Looks good; it might not beat a new GTR, but I reckon you could get pretty close
Old 03-16-08, 12:56 AM
  #44  
Lives on the Forum

 
Black91n/a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 5,707
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
This reminds me of SCC doing a shootout between their project Toyota MRS (turbo, suspension mods, R's) and an Elise. Despite posting better performance numbers all around, on track it was a dead heat between the two with the Elise being much easier to drive. Just goes to show that there's a lot more to speed than speed tests.
Old 03-16-08, 01:18 AM
  #45  
The Assistant

 
I love pop-up lights's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My benchmark would have to be whatever is out on the track with me on a given day
Old 03-16-08, 01:27 AM
  #46  
6 Speed FC

iTrader: (2)
 
Brismo7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Orange, CA
Posts: 2,258
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Healing
I bet you get so much traction on those stock TII wheels
Your LS1 looks like its mounted a lot lower than other LS1 swaps I've seen, what kit are you using? Or maybe it's just me. Looks good; it might not beat a new GTR, but I reckon you could get pretty close

Thanks man i appreciate the nice comments.

Traction? what is this word you speak of? i've never heard this before LMAO. yeah you dont get much traction on 205's. LMAFO

as for the kit, its actually more forward than some other cars. i'm using grannys kit and i'm using the front holes instead of the rear holes.

i know it cant beat a stock GTR in its current form. and i'd have to be an excellent driver to keep up with a skyline from a dig.(not happening anytime soon). so i'm realistic. ****, those new GTRs are so fast is re-dunk-ulous... this is my ultimate goal, to see the look on his 70k dollar face when he finally gets beat by this old *** mazda


Originally Posted by Black91n/a
Just goes to show that there's a lot more to speed than speed tests.
For sure. definitely aggree there.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:08 AM.