What's your benchmark?
#27
Former FC enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
An S2000 with the same modifications as an FC will always be faster due to having a more modern suspension design. As for out performing just a stock one, DIYMAN25 here built an FB that had basic suspension modifications, was N/A and ran faster than a stock S2000 driven by some pro Japanese driver on his local track (buttonwillow I think).
My goal is also to outperform a stock S2000, but its far as I'm attending college and working part time. Right now its more like getting in track time, mastering driving, then suspension, wheel, tires, brakes and finally the powertrain.
And the first reply is retarded, it will still cost less than the initial price of an S2000. The reason I chose an older car is my fascination of RX7s, the fact that it will be cheaper (shows people they don't need 25k+ to get into road racing), and the challenge of using a 20 year old suspension design against modern sports cars.
My goal is also to outperform a stock S2000, but its far as I'm attending college and working part time. Right now its more like getting in track time, mastering driving, then suspension, wheel, tires, brakes and finally the powertrain.
And the first reply is retarded, it will still cost less than the initial price of an S2000. The reason I chose an older car is my fascination of RX7s, the fact that it will be cheaper (shows people they don't need 25k+ to get into road racing), and the challenge of using a 20 year old suspension design against modern sports cars.
Last edited by KhanArtisT; 03-14-08 at 05:52 PM.
#28
6 Speed FC
iTrader: (2)
I was talking about new wheels and tires mostly. It's not that often that some really nice wheels or tires come up for those sort of prices. Some stuff that's more commonly available like Mustang 17x8's are cheap, but heavy, something like a really light Enkei RP-F1 will set you back $1k. Good, new tires will also run you well over $400 new, unless maybe you're getting 15's and the tires are on sale.
Why?
my car is pretty damn fast to. I think your 100% close minded on the situation
Last edited by Brismo7; 03-14-08 at 06:06 PM.
#29
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Boston MA
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Whats wrong with used/on sale items? Be smart when purchasing items.....
Yep. my bushing install from a shop, including other minor services cost me almost $900. That is a lesson i learned. When i do it again, i will have the proper tools and save me that cash.
Why?
my car is pretty damn fast to. I think your 100% close minded on the situation
Yep. my bushing install from a shop, including other minor services cost me almost $900. That is a lesson i learned. When i do it again, i will have the proper tools and save me that cash.
Why?
my car is pretty damn fast to. I think your 100% close minded on the situation
#30
Benchmark - something that can be used for daily driving, and drift days.
Ideally:
Full Tamon design aero
Full interior, but perhaps with a 4 pt roll cage
Stock LS1/LS2
But only if I kept my car for that long. I might just end up selling it and buying a truck. And a 125cc shifter. Or maybe just an S2000 altogether.
Ideally:
Full Tamon design aero
Full interior, but perhaps with a 4 pt roll cage
Stock LS1/LS2
But only if I kept my car for that long. I might just end up selling it and buying a truck. And a 125cc shifter. Or maybe just an S2000 altogether.
#31
Former FC enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
I love noobies. They're always coming in here in their slow 80's mobiles trying to beat faster, newer cars.
What happened to the days when people bought cars so they could enjoy driving? NOw a days it seems like people buy cars so they can beat this other newer, faster car. My goal is to beat this, or beat that or kill this. I guess everyone has SOMETHING to prove and cars helps them prove it. I thought this thread had potential.
What happened to the days when people bought cars so they could enjoy driving? NOw a days it seems like people buy cars so they can beat this other newer, faster car. My goal is to beat this, or beat that or kill this. I guess everyone has SOMETHING to prove and cars helps them prove it. I thought this thread had potential.
#32
rotorhead
iTrader: (3)
benchmark? C6 Z06, especially in terms of straightline performance and power output. With my T04S turbo and supporting mods (and a 55 gallon drum of race gas at my house) I'll be close to that once I get a little more money together for an AVC-R boost controller. I may not have enough turbo though, although I have everything else I need (fuel, standalone, etc). I have decent handling mods too. bushings, non adjustable springs and shocks, sway bars. Just need better tires and eventually coilovers.
The only thing I have to prove is that I can tune this myself, by learning from my own mistakes and the mistakes of others. And if I blow the motor, well, fine. It's got s4 irons anyway, it's bound to pop.
The only thing I have to prove is that I can tune this myself, by learning from my own mistakes and the mistakes of others. And if I blow the motor, well, fine. It's got s4 irons anyway, it's bound to pop.
Last edited by arghx; 03-14-08 at 09:10 PM.
#34
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Boston MA
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
MAAYBE a stock GTR with the factory tires...thats still pushing it. It still depends on what type of course though, maybe a low speed twisty course, but a high speed track like the nurburgring I think the GTR would win...doesn't prove anything IMO. A fully built stripped FC on slicks outruns a stock GTR that can be driven to work everyday
Oh and I love my car as is, but there is always room for improvement.
#35
my benchmark is my 1990 infini FC rx7 in my GT4 garage, 4** whp, 4** wtq...and i wana be able to switch settings from suspension to downforce using my ps2 controller...and of course that awesome 400 some odd mpg while constantly redlining every turn
on a serious note: i like how the OP put some thought to his mods, unlike some folks who strap on just about anythin
on a serious note: i like how the OP put some thought to his mods, unlike some folks who strap on just about anythin
#36
FCs are great cars, but its hard to be closed minded when there are so many other great cars out there.
Oh, and to OP, if you want to be competitive with an S2000, you should definitely rethink progressive springs and HPs. Ewwwwwww
#37
Lives on the Forum
It's not about how often you track the car, it's about how it's driven when you're there. Some tracks are really hard on brakes and will fade race pads and fluid on stock cars. Other tracks are more forgiving. Don't count on street pads being ok. I've seen people at the track fighting braking issues all weekend and having to miss sessions and generally having a crappy time because they're on street pads. You'll also need to be sure that you've got fresh high temp fluid in the system.
#38
pwned
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern Indiana
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
im looking for a car with power in the 6lbs/hp range. so ill need power in the mid 5's to get that to the wheels. if i can get my cars weight down to around 2700lbs, ill need 450hp at the crank to accomplish my goal. all i REALLY need is a bigger turbo with some custom headers and a DP, and more fuel. suspension will be upgraded even more than it is now, and ill need some much wider tires, so that calls for some body work too. ill wait till i have around 10k to play wit ths project.
#39
Lives on the Forum
I didn't say it can't be done, it's just unrealistic to expect that a tuned FC could soundly beat it. You'd need at minimum 400+hp, and probably V8 torque, hugely wide, very sticky tires, widebody, high end suspension set up by professionals, and so on. Basically a fully race prepped car. You may think your car's fast, but I can guarantee you it's not even close.
#40
Canned. I got CORNED!
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Appleton, WI
Posts: 1,029
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If I needed a big dyno number or a fast timeslip to be happy, I wouldn't have bought this car, I would buy a 5.0 mustang just like everyone else and be boring with it.
I bought this car because I've always been fascinated with the rotary...I just want to have fun with it. That's my "benchmark".
I bought this car because I've always been fascinated with the rotary...I just want to have fun with it. That's my "benchmark".
#41
6 Speed FC
iTrader: (2)
How dare you insult my Rx7 by even mentioning big heavy 1950's american technology! Why would i want a tractor motor?
oh nevermind. i forgot about the ls1 residing in my engine bay...
Like i said, i have roughly 280RWHP on my bone stock engine. 400hp is roughly 1500 dollars and a tune away.
eh, your most likely right
oh nevermind. i forgot about the ls1 residing in my engine bay...
Like i said, i have roughly 280RWHP on my bone stock engine. 400hp is roughly 1500 dollars and a tune away.
eh, your most likely right
#42
Rotary Powered Since 1995
iTrader: (4)
If I needed a big dyno number or a fast timeslip to be happy, I wouldn't have bought this car, I would buy a 5.0 mustang just like everyone else and be boring with it.
I bought this car because I've always been fascinated with the rotary...I just want to have fun with it. That's my "benchmark".
I bought this car because I've always been fascinated with the rotary...I just want to have fun with it. That's my "benchmark".
Still, it is fun to squeeze a little extra performance out of the old technology without completely changing the character of the car. I guess I'd say my performance benchmark is to improve a little on what the car could do stock when it was new in the 80s. In the meantime, I enjoy it because it is a 20 year old car, not in spite of this. I like the roll-up windows, the 80s-futuristic interior, the outdated flip-up lights, etc. FCs are cool.
#43
Your LS1 looks like its mounted a lot lower than other LS1 swaps I've seen, what kit are you using? Or maybe it's just me. Looks good; it might not beat a new GTR, but I reckon you could get pretty close
#44
Lives on the Forum
This reminds me of SCC doing a shootout between their project Toyota MRS (turbo, suspension mods, R's) and an Elise. Despite posting better performance numbers all around, on track it was a dead heat between the two with the Elise being much easier to drive. Just goes to show that there's a lot more to speed than speed tests.
#46
6 Speed FC
iTrader: (2)
Thanks man i appreciate the nice comments.
Traction? what is this word you speak of? i've never heard this before LMAO. yeah you dont get much traction on 205's. LMAFO
as for the kit, its actually more forward than some other cars. i'm using grannys kit and i'm using the front holes instead of the rear holes.
i know it cant beat a stock GTR in its current form. and i'd have to be an excellent driver to keep up with a skyline from a dig.(not happening anytime soon). so i'm realistic. ****, those new GTRs are so fast is re-dunk-ulous... this is my ultimate goal, to see the look on his 70k dollar face when he finally gets beat by this old *** mazda
For sure. definitely aggree there.