2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

What about an H1C?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 23, 2005 | 10:51 PM
  #1  
Makenzie71's Avatar
Thread Starter
...94% correct.
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 2
From: High Texas
What about an H1C?

...with all this I hear about turbine housings being too small on most easy to find, cheap turbos, I'm curious what you guys might think of an H1C or similar setup? Simple and easy to work with...easy to match flanges and they're a "dry" turbo (I think that's the propper term...only have oil running through them)...and they're cheap. Lots of holesets on Ebay for under $100.

Opinions?
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2005 | 11:16 PM
  #2  
Makenzie71's Avatar
Thread Starter
...94% correct.
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 2
From: High Texas
...bahahaha...or a TE0644...lol...there's one on ebay right now for $46...
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2005 | 11:21 PM
  #3  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Originally Posted by Makenzie71
......they're a "dry" turbo (I think that's the propper term...only have oil running through them)...
I would consider that a disadvantage.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2005 | 11:27 PM
  #4  
Makenzie71's Avatar
Thread Starter
...94% correct.
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 2
From: High Texas
Originally Posted by NZConvertible
I would consider that a disadvantage.
I'm still not real sure as to how watercooling effects them other than to keep temps down in high-stress situations, but I know that the motors that these come off of are under far more stress through out their life than what the average rotary should see. But, again, still learning...I was looking at it as an added simplicity...not that running coolant to a turbo is difficult. I just like looking at the cheap options out there.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2005 | 11:38 PM
  #5  
Full Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 68
Likes: 1
From: Utah
The only reason water's there is to keep the oil inside the turbo from coking due to overheating.

As long as you time your engine (turbo timer), and have a good oil cooler, you're good to go.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2005 | 11:47 PM
  #6  
Makenzie71's Avatar
Thread Starter
...94% correct.
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 2
From: High Texas
Don't FC's have a really good oil cooler?
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2005 | 11:54 PM
  #7  
slpin's Avatar
7th Heaven
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,663
Likes: 4
From: California
yes
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2005 | 03:06 AM
  #8  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Water-cooling means the core runs at lower temps and hence lasts longer. A turbo timer only helps at shut-down. It doesn't do squat when the turbo's actually being used.

I'm not saying water cooling is strictly necessary, just pointing out that the lack of it is not an advantage, which was implied in the first post.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rotor Rolla
Single Turbo RX-7's
18
Dec 10, 2010 07:45 PM
duwacker69
Single Turbo RX-7's
1
May 13, 2009 07:51 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:35 PM.