2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

went to the track, disappointed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 22, 2003 | 11:52 PM
  #1  
Ryde _Or_Die's Avatar
Thread Starter
...
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 7,539
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, FL
Unhappy went to the track, disappointed

Well I went to the track tonight. I drove like **** every damn run. Best run I have a slip for is a 13.8@102. One run I spun the launch and missed 3rd and still got a 102.5 so I know my car alot more potential. Oh well, better luck next time.
Reply
Old May 23, 2003 | 12:19 AM
  #2  
3isacharm's Avatar
Car>woman
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
From: Woodstock, GA
you got a timeslip we could analyze? that's a pretty high mph for a 13.8
Reply
Old May 23, 2003 | 12:23 AM
  #3  
Ryde _Or_Die's Avatar
Thread Starter
...
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 7,539
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, FL
RT .767
60' 2.116
330 5.981
1/8 9.069
MPH 81.29
1000 11.688
1/4 13.885
MPH 102.55
Reply
Old May 23, 2003 | 12:28 AM
  #4  
Digi7ech's Avatar
I break Diff mounts
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,403
Likes: 4
From: Avondale, Arizona
Boo hoo try pulling a 18.1 in your 88 SE or a 17.1 in your 88 GTU then you can be disappointed.

I'd say try the 60ft. That will decrease your time incredibly.

My first run in my 88 SE was like 2.8 and I got it to run a 17.4 with a 2.402 60ft.
Reply
Old May 23, 2003 | 12:48 AM
  #5  
J-Rat's Avatar
Alcohol Fueled!
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,093
Likes: 2
From: Hood River oregon
I was gonna say..Thats not the worst timeslip I have ever seen. Fairly respectible for a TII.
Jarrett
Reply
Old May 23, 2003 | 12:59 AM
  #6  
Ryde _Or_Die's Avatar
Thread Starter
...
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 7,539
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, FL
Well I just know that with a 102-103 trap I can get a low low 13. I was really just not driving like I usually do for some reason. It was about to rain so they were rushing people through too. Oh well, no excuses. Just gives me more reason to be more prepared and drive better next time.
Reply
Old May 23, 2003 | 01:01 AM
  #7  
J-Rat's Avatar
Alcohol Fueled!
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,093
Likes: 2
From: Hood River oregon
Maybe if you worked on your 60 ft a little, but thats better then my 60 ft times.

Mine were in the 2.4-2.6 range.
Reply
Old May 23, 2003 | 01:06 AM
  #8  
Ryde _Or_Die's Avatar
Thread Starter
...
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 7,539
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, FL
Well I got a 2.0 once, so thats over 1/10 of a second better than my best run. Shouldn't that take at least 2 tenths off my ET?
Reply
Old May 23, 2003 | 01:41 AM
  #9  
J-Rat's Avatar
Alcohol Fueled!
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,093
Likes: 2
From: Hood River oregon
Well, usually the 60 ft is a big indicator of the launch, and the place where you can make up the most time.


You would think that if you made a tenth on the launch, that you would see it on the other end, but thats not always the case. Too many variables. Especially in a 5 speed car.

Jarrett
Reply
Old May 23, 2003 | 01:58 AM
  #10  
$150FC's Avatar
Currently Winning
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,438
Likes: 0
From: Birmingham, AL
A 2.1 60 foot time is not that bad, though. There's room for improvement, yeah, but it's not bad.
Reply
Old May 23, 2003 | 03:04 AM
  #11  
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta.Georgia
with those mods it should be in the 12s. your launch could inprove some. exp if you where on your drag radials. 102 is a high 13 for a rx7. i know someone that got a 13.6 on a 102 in a t2
Reply
Old May 23, 2003 | 03:12 AM
  #12  
bl|nk's Avatar
Fok mi
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 892
Likes: 0
From: Sioux Falls, SD
think of the bright side .. you didn't break anything

you'll get better numbers as your track time increases.
Reply
Old May 23, 2003 | 08:11 AM
  #13  
Barwick's Avatar
SCCA Rookie
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,936
Likes: 0
From: Sterling Heights, MI
Originally posted by 3isacharm
you got a timeslip we could analyze? that's a pretty high mph for a 13.8
Think that's bad?

R/T .709
60 ft 2.091
594 ft 8.518
1/8 ET 9.056
1/8 MPH 83.62
1/4 ET 13.755
1/4 MPH 104.87

Think I could be doing a little faster than 13.755 when I'm trapping near 105 mph? I do.. just can't seem to know how to launch the sucker to not bog or get huge wheelspin.
Reply
Old May 23, 2003 | 08:58 AM
  #14  
gsracer's Avatar
EIT
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,790
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Have you had the car tuned with a wideband yet?

what psi are you running on the new turbo.

You're set up has the potential to go 12's, just need to work on the driving and getting it all tuned. It's all good though, you'll get faster
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2011 | 07:04 AM
  #15  
supergoat's Avatar
Eggs are like fowl cheese
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 574
Likes: 0
From: Daniel Island, SC
Wow, that's about the same time as a Bolt-On RX-8...

http://www.rx8club.com/showthread.php?t=215730

Read thread for happy good fun times!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Coochas
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
44
Nov 5, 2019 11:08 PM
23Racer
Canadian Forum
13
Nov 25, 2018 04:44 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:56 AM.