Weight, holy sh!t
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NYC/Stony Brook Univ.
Posts: 702
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Weight, holy ****
OMFG i just read my factory manual for the first time...
it says non-turbo RX-& has a curb weight of : 3600+ LBS!!!!!
Is that a typo b/c the reason i got the rx7 to begin with was because i heard it had great balance of weight and power. I should of just got a 240sx maybe, they weight like 2800+ lbs.
1988 GXL (5 spd) manual by the way.
it says non-turbo RX-& has a curb weight of : 3600+ LBS!!!!!
Is that a typo b/c the reason i got the rx7 to begin with was because i heard it had great balance of weight and power. I should of just got a 240sx maybe, they weight like 2800+ lbs.
1988 GXL (5 spd) manual by the way.
#3
casio isn't here.
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Greenpoint, Brooklyn
Posts: 3,332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the only FC with weight over 3000 is convertibles (or FCs with a few subs and a fat passenger). your car should also be in the neighborhood of 2800.
goto www.mazdamark.com
curb weight: 2720, turbo: 2850, convertible: 3003
goto www.mazdamark.com
curb weight: 2720, turbo: 2850, convertible: 3003
Last edited by casio; 03-02-04 at 04:42 PM.
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NYC/Stony Brook Univ.
Posts: 702
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
lol, sorry, didnt meanto give any one a heart attack.
the GVWR (gross vehicle weight rating) is 3625 lbs. i assume thats the total maximum weight that the car should have at any given time.
the GVWR (gross vehicle weight rating) is 3625 lbs. i assume thats the total maximum weight that the car should have at any given time.
#7
casio isn't here.
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Greenpoint, Brooklyn
Posts: 3,332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
89 Turbo: 2987; 90 Turbo: 298X (7?); 91 Turbo: 2987
the "90's" is smudged, but i assume all three are said to be the same. i dont get how its a "pig" when its only 137 pounds heavier (S4: 2850; S5: 2987). over by 5 or under by 13? i think you need the diet, Santi !
the "90's" is smudged, but i assume all three are said to be the same. i dont get how its a "pig" when its only 137 pounds heavier (S4: 2850; S5: 2987). over by 5 or under by 13? i think you need the diet, Santi !
Trending Topics
#10
casio isn't here.
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Greenpoint, Brooklyn
Posts: 3,332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
in comparison to what? its 2800 on the chart. same as same-year GTU supposedly. had an aluminum hood and less options.
http://www.mazdamark.com/about_the_s5_fc.htm
http://www.mazdamark.com/about_the_s5_fc.htm
#13
Lives on the Forum
I believe you're looking at the "curb"(?) weight rating, which includes full tank of gas, all fluids topped off to spec, full cargo capacity (150 lbs.?), and a driver and passenger (both rated at 150lbs. I believe?).
-Ted
-Ted
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post