2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

warning for true duals

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 17, 2003 | 11:30 PM
  #1  
kd86rx7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,133
Likes: 0
From: milpitas, CA
warning for true duals

hey i jsut got my true duals for my 91 n/a, and there are two stickers/tags in there that said "warning use octane 92 or higher only" should i use 92 or higher only or jsut stick with my regular gas octane, 87.

thanks
eric
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2003 | 11:33 PM
  #2  
Evil Aviator's Avatar
Rotorhead
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 39
From: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Ask Mazdatrix for an explanation.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2003 | 11:59 PM
  #3  
1987RX7guy's Avatar
Eat Rice Don't Drive it.
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 12,752
Likes: 1
From: Laredo, Tx
hahahah wtf are they talking about?

I have run 87 since I got them a year ago and nothing wrong has happened. :-/

Santiago

PS e-mail MT and ask why they recommend taht **** now.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2003 | 12:44 AM
  #4  
Driv300mph's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma
I'm curious too.. They are on my '91 N/A also, nothing has gone wrong with mine either.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2003 | 05:56 AM
  #5  
bingoboy's Avatar
Lava Surfer
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,354
Likes: 0
From: Kailua, HI
Re: warning for true duals

Originally posted by kd86rx7
hey i jsut got my true duals for my 91 n/a, and there are two stickers/tags in there that said "warning use octane 92 or higher only" should i use 92 or higher only or jsut stick with my regular gas octane, 87.

thanks
eric
hey that's funny stuff considering mazdatrix is in SoCal and the best gas we have here is 91 octane . maybe they wan't you to shoot more flame flame
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2003 | 08:12 AM
  #6  
pp13bnos's Avatar
Pineapple Racer
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,698
Likes: 7
From: Oregon
Cheapest stuff possiable is what I run. CJ
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2003 | 09:34 AM
  #7  
KNONFS's Avatar
B O R I C U A
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,482
Likes: 36
From: VA
Originally posted by 1987RX7guy
hahahah wtf are they talking about?

I have run 87 since I got them a year ago and nothing wrong has happened. :-/

Santiago

PS e-mail MT and ask why they recommend taht **** now.
It is NOT a now thing!

I got the same sticker when I purchased the Road header, pre silencer, HKS cat back
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2003 | 11:13 AM
  #8  
mazdaspeed7's Avatar
mad scientist
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,665
Likes: 2
From: Savannah, GA
I think the premium gas thing is misleading. You dont have to run premium, but your timing may need to be adjusted. I had my timing advanced before my true dual(very long time ago), and when I put the true dual on, I had to take out some of the advance due to preignition. Apparently a more free flowing exhaust reduces the prignition threshold.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2003 | 12:44 PM
  #9  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,833
Likes: 3,232
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally posted by mazdaspeed7
I think the premium gas thing is misleading. You dont have to run premium, but your timing may need to be adjusted. I had my timing advanced before my true dual(very long time ago), and when I put the true dual on, I had to take out some of the advance due to preignition. Apparently a more free flowing exhaust reduces the prignition threshold.
more scavenging = less burned gasses in the combustion chamber for the next cycle

mike
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2003 | 07:21 AM
  #10  
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
From: Columbia, SC
KD - what kinda dual did you get? How much? Got pics? Did you notice some good performance when you put em on? Hows it sound?

Sorry for all the questions, im interested in moving to true dual myself. I have a 91 vert n/a.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2003 | 09:02 AM
  #11  
1987RX7guy's Avatar
Eat Rice Don't Drive it.
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 12,752
Likes: 1
From: Laredo, Tx
I have the ones with RB mufflers. Search for Rarestrx he also has them and hat a write-up on them. With some very nice pics of them on the car from under it. The performance of True duals is very noticable.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2003 | 03:21 PM
  #12  
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
From: Columbia, SC
Sweet!

Bing!

That looks like a sweet *** exhaust. $1300 though. hmm.... Tax Return.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2003 | 03:58 PM
  #13  
1987RX7guy's Avatar
Eat Rice Don't Drive it.
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 12,752
Likes: 1
From: Laredo, Tx
Yes they are very sweet. If you search for my thread where I met up with other peeps from around here namely MAX and Wankel7 you will see some nice sound clips/vids and pics. Some people don't like the sound of the True Duals. But I love the sound. Specially after hearing other exhausts like the cork sport, N1's, etc.

Santiago

BTW- The price is the killing factor for them.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2003 | 04:10 PM
  #14  
djmtsu's Avatar
DGRRX
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,243
Likes: 0
From: Murfreesboro TN
Yeah thats a little much for an exhaust system, considering I didn't pay that much for the entire car. Also I can't justify spending more on an exhaust system than it costs for a rebuild.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2003 | 04:18 PM
  #15  
1987RX7guy's Avatar
Eat Rice Don't Drive it.
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 12,752
Likes: 1
From: Laredo, Tx
Yeah well I still haven't needed one so there.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2003 | 07:43 PM
  #16  
djmtsu's Avatar
DGRRX
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,243
Likes: 0
From: Murfreesboro TN
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2003 | 08:32 PM
  #17  
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
From: Columbia, SC
How long you think that bad-boy will last?
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2003 | 08:38 PM
  #18  
5 point whoa's Avatar
Poor Lil' Kid
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,504
Likes: 0
From: Wilmington NC
I've always been confused on why to not run 93 in an n/a, I've ran it for the past year, and my car runs smoother and quicker than before, please explain
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2003 | 09:50 PM
  #19  
kd86rx7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,133
Likes: 0
From: milpitas, CA
mazdatrix emailed me back saying..."ignore the tag--looks like we forgot to take it out"
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2003 | 09:53 PM
  #20  
Digi7ech's Avatar
I break Diff mounts
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,403
Likes: 4
From: Avondale, Arizona
It has a higher detonation/combustion rating.

I think(might be wrong) that the lower the number means that it burns quicker while higher octanes burn slower.
Correct me if I'm wrong since I'm guessing.

I ran mid grade in my GTU but didn't notice a thing so Now I'm using the lowest (87 i think) and it's running the same.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2003 | 10:00 PM
  #21  
mazdaspeed7's Avatar
mad scientist
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,665
Likes: 2
From: Savannah, GA
The car seems to run smoother on 93 octane, but it takes longer to burn. Only a small part of the power stroke is truly efficient. Think about the expanding gasses. You have gas under pressure, but as it expands, the pressure decreases. As the pressure decreases, so does the force exerted by the gas. At low rpm's, this isnt a problem when you have the timing advanced. The mixture still has time to burn within thew window of efficiency in the power stroke. But as rpm's climb, that time is reduced, but the gas doesnt burn any slower. So youre losing more and more of the force during the efficient part of the power stroke as the rpm's climb.

Now, this isnt a difference of 20 rwhp. Nowhere near that drastic. But the reasons for 93 octane are that it is less volatile, which makes it mroe resistant to knock. BUT, the volatility of gas in general is what makes power, and within the safe limits of the motor, a lower octane will always make more power. This does NOT account for timing, as this alters the safe limits of the motor, as does boost. Another thing, you will get better gas mileage with lower octane. Back to the volatility thing. The gas burns faster, therefore more of its energy is used in the efficient part of the power stroke. This requires less fuel to make the same power. If the power stays constant(say cruising), less gas will be used.

Octane can hide other problems. For the longest time, I could not run 87 octane. No matter how much i retarded the timing, it just would not run as good on 87 octane as with 89 or 93. Come to find out, my intake temps were too high(cone filter in the engine bay, no cold air box), and later, my plugs were too hot. Now that that stuff has been taken care of, my car runs like a champ on 87. And the money I save on gas can be put to better use.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2003 | 10:01 PM
  #22  
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
From: Altamonte Springs
The octane rating has nothing to do with burning/flame speed. It's just a gauge for resisting preignition/detonation. Some require high octane since they will det/ping with the low stuff.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2003 | 10:07 PM
  #23  
Evil Aviator's Avatar
Rotorhead
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 39
From: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Originally posted by 5 point whoa
I've always been confused on why to not run 93 in an n/a, I've ran it for the past year, and my car runs smoother and quicker than before, please explain
There is nothing wrong with running high octane in an NA other than it's a waste of money for most people. If your engine is in extremely poor shape and detonating, or if your engine is highly modified with advanced timing, then high octane will make the engine run better. Otherwise, high octane will do nothing for you, as it does not run any cleaner, it is not any more powerful, and it doesn't have any other magical properties, despite what the money-grubbing oil companies want you to think.

Read the FTC's response to the misleading advertising of high-octane fuel:
http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/autos/octane.htm

It's interesting that when it comes down to official statements, the oil companies come clean on the issue:
http://www.chevron.com/prodserv/fuel...i_octane.shtml

You know how all of the oil company advertisements always say that their most expensive gas has their "special sauce" additives? Well, what they usually fail to mention is that ALL their grades of pump gas also have it, lol.
Hey look, Techron is in all 3 fuel grades!
http://www.chevron.com/prodserv/fuel...tech_gas.shtml
Hey, so is CleanSystem3!
http://www.texaco.com/texaco/prodsvc...tm#cleansystem
Hey, all of the Shell grades have their special super-secret additive too!
http://www.shellus.com/products/prod...oline_faq.html

Hmm, I'm sensing a trend here.

Therefore, if the ONLY advantage of high-octane pump gas is it's anti-knock properties, and your engine doesn't have a knocking problem, then what are you paying for?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Turblown
Vendor Classifieds
12
Oct 17, 2020 03:25 PM
Robrods64
New Member RX-7 Technical
6
Oct 2, 2015 07:56 PM
vish86
Interior / Exterior / Audio
3
Oct 1, 2015 11:53 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:03 AM.