2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Turbo Inlet Size

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 17, 2006 | 02:24 PM
  #26  
rotorforce's Avatar
I'm back Bishes
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,241
Likes: 0
From: Rhode Island
If you were purchasing intercooler couplings then a 2.5" would do just fine. Since the thin wall of the piping is taken into consideration. Using a fernco coupling from a harware store you would have to get a 2" due the the wall thickness. The inside diameter of the hardware store 2" coupling is just slightly under 2.5"
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2006 | 02:34 PM
  #27  
13bturbofc's Avatar
mmm doritos
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,107
Likes: 0
From: lancaster PA
omg this is getting out of hand lets end this thread.....lol....ps just go get a damn silicone coupler it will be worth it in the end they last alot longer
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2006 | 02:46 AM
  #28  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Originally Posted by Nismo Convert86
I seriously think some times you are messed in the head...
Luckily your opinion of me isn't what gets me out of bed in the morning.

I don't live in the US so your prices are similar to mine, and i paid 20bucks CDN for my tid, thats still half the regular price.
You can still buy from eBay just like I can. I'm on a budget too, and I like finding cost-effective solutions, but that doesn't necessarily mean finding the cheapest way possible. The fact is your $20 TID (which I assume is made of PVC pipe fittings and plumbing couplers) will not flow nearly as well as one made from metal pipe with a proper reducer. Low-velocity water doesn't care about sharp internal corners and protrusions; high-velocity air does, particularly right at the compressor entry. Apart from that fact that it looks like ***, I'm not prepared to make performance compromises like that just to save a few bucks. But that's just me...
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2006 | 05:12 AM
  #29  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
Holy crap people, most of you have the learn how to use a dial caliper, as it's the proper instrument for measurement in this case.

NZConvertible is right - the proper O.D. (OUTSIDE DIAMETER, for those who have no clue what the acronym stands for) is *60mm*.

A 2.0" hose will stretch to accomodate the slightly larger 60mm.
BTW, 2.0" = ~52mm (multiply by 2.54), so we're talking about a 8mm difference in diameter.
Flexibile rubber / silicone will stretch, but this is not recommended.

Not recommended?
Why?
That particular application has heat and vibration.
Using too-small of a hose will prematurely cause it to crack and fail, especially in the case with non-reinforced rubber.

2.5" is a better compromise - just tight the clamp down to the smaller 60mm O.D. of the turbo inlet.
2.5" = ~65mm, so we're talking ~5mm oversized.

Is the name calling really necessary here???


-Ted
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2006 | 05:20 AM
  #30  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
Holy crap people, most of you have the learn how to use a dial caliper, as it's the proper instrument for measurement in this case.

NZConvertible is right - the proper O.D. (OUTSIDE DIAMETER, for those who have no clue what the acronym stands for) is *60mm*.

A 2.0" hose will stretch to accomodate the slightly larger 60mm.
BTW, 2.0" = ~52mm (multiply by 2.54), so we're talking about a 8mm difference in diameter.
Flexibile rubber / silicone will stretch, but this is not recommended.

Not recommended?
Why?
That particular application has heat and vibration.
Using too-small of a hose will prematurely cause it to crack and fail, especially in the case with non-reinforced rubber.

2.5" is a better compromise - just tight the clamp down to the smaller 60mm O.D. of the turbo inlet.
2.5" = ~65mm, so we're talking ~5mm oversized.

Is the name calling really necessary here???


-Ted
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
streetlegal?
New Member RX-7 Technical
13
Mar 17, 2022 02:46 PM
FD7KiD
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
15
Feb 26, 2021 10:12 PM
Th0m4s
Build Threads
25
Feb 26, 2019 02:04 AM
FD7KiD
Single Turbo RX-7's
1
Aug 17, 2015 11:50 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:38 PM.