2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

torque?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-29-05, 05:50 AM
  #1  
Junior Member

Thread Starter
 
mraxz-d7a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: bremerton
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
torque?

so if my fc has 138 torque at 3800 rpm how much torque do i have up hi like 6300 6500 rpm. do you lose alot and its all hp after 3800 or do you only lose a lil? please help
Old 12-29-05, 06:30 AM
  #2  
I

iTrader: (6)
 
KompressorLOgic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Spanaway, WA
Posts: 3,755
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
you only would lose a tiny bit, the curve on my dyno seemed pretty flat, i have a full exhaust on my NA though

i ended up peaking torque at about 5400 rpm though, and between 4500-6500 the torque was still within 5 ft/lbs of the peak
Old 12-29-05, 06:31 AM
  #3  
Junior Member

Thread Starter
 
mraxz-d7a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: bremerton
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
how much did that full exhast help hp wise
Old 12-29-05, 06:34 AM
  #4  
I

iTrader: (6)
 
KompressorLOgic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Spanaway, WA
Posts: 3,755
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
i didnt have a base line dyno,

but i dynoed 133 hp ant 115 ft/lbs, with an engine with quite alot of miles, over 150K prolly,its a pretty worn engine. compression was around 90 all around.
Old 12-29-05, 06:37 AM
  #5  
Junior Member

Thread Starter
 
mraxz-d7a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: bremerton
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
isnt it suposed to have like 120 to be ok and lik140150 great?
Old 12-29-05, 06:43 AM
  #6  
I

iTrader: (6)
 
KompressorLOgic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Spanaway, WA
Posts: 3,755
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
the factory rated hp is 146 ,

dynoing to the wheels from the factory it would put between 110-120 brand new.

with the low compression my motor had id say it was probably making about 105 if i dynoed it stock.
Old 12-29-05, 06:45 AM
  #7  
Junior Member

Thread Starter
 
mraxz-d7a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: bremerton
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i was talking compression my bad like 120s ok and 140 150 is great 90 realy shity right
Old 12-29-05, 06:58 AM
  #8  
spending too much money..

iTrader: (2)
 
hondahater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: louisiana
Posts: 10,117
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
no 120 is great and 140 or 150 would be a high compression 240sx or something around there.
Old 12-29-05, 06:59 AM
  #9  
Junior Member

Thread Starter
 
mraxz-d7a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: bremerton
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
so what normal then lik 110?
Old 12-29-05, 07:09 AM
  #10  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Torque normally falls off as the engine approaches redline.
This is just the normal dynamics and physics of the internal combustion engine.
There are tricks to keep the torque up - i.e. VDI, switching short / long runners, etc., but torque tends to fall on the top end.

Sorry, but if you want "gobs of torque", you need to go forced induction or more displacement.


-Ted
Old 12-29-05, 01:34 PM
  #11  
slower than granny

 
Green_Streak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: In Your Dreams
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
a stock engine making 146 HP at 6500 rpm is making 118 lb-ft of torque at that same 6500 rpm. HP is a function of torque. HP, Torque, and RPM. take any two and you can find out the third
Old 12-29-05, 02:35 PM
  #12  
_

 
Mordachai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: South Florida WPB
Posts: 634
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RETed
Torque normally falls off as the engine approaches redline.
This is just the normal dynamics and physics of the internal combustion engine.
There are tricks to keep the torque up - i.e. VDI, switching short / long runners, etc., but torque tends to fall on the top end.

Sorry, but if you want "gobs of torque", you need to go forced induction or more displacement.


-Ted
So- who's going to make the newest 3.2 Litre Rotary?


LOL
Old 12-29-05, 02:37 PM
  #13  
MattB

 
MattB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Haverhill, MA
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Torque??? Whats that?
Old 12-29-05, 02:59 PM
  #14  
Is that thing Turbo?

 
totallimmortal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Green_Streak
a stock engine making 146 HP at 6500 rpm is making 118 lb-ft of torque at that same 6500 rpm. HP is a function of torque. HP, Torque, and RPM. take any two and you can find out the third
I don'tr think you could find rpm from only tourque and hp numbers could you
Old 12-29-05, 05:19 PM
  #15  
Tear you apart

iTrader: (10)
 
Jager's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bemidji Minnesota
Posts: 5,883
Received 32 Likes on 30 Posts
Originally Posted by mraxz-d7a
so what normal then lik 110?
127HP is the baseline number for a good engine (according to Kahren).
Old 12-29-05, 05:28 PM
  #16  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (7)
 
Sideways7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Temple, Texas (Central)
Posts: 6,594
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by totallimmortal
I don'tr think you could find rpm from only tourque and hp numbers could you
Yes, you can. Hp is torque times RPM/5252,
so if H=horespower, T=torque, and R=RPMs, then
H=T*(R/5252)
From this you can get that R=(H/T)*5252
Old 12-30-05, 03:28 AM
  #17  
coolant leak that kills

iTrader: (1)
 
7romanstatesmen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: colorado
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^

which is why the torque and hp curves on all dyno graphs should cross at 5252 rpm, because (5252/5252) equals one, and so horsepower will always equal torque at that specific rpm.
Old 12-30-05, 05:30 AM
  #18  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by 7romanstatesmen
^

which is why the torque and hp curves on all dyno graphs should cross at 5252 rpm, because (5252/5252) equals one, and so horsepower will always equal torque at that specific rpm.
That is correct IF the torque and hp scales are exactly the same.
Some DynoJet graphs like to scale different torque and hp axes, so be careful about this.


-Ted
Old 12-30-05, 12:38 PM
  #19  
'86 N/A Phone Dials

 
Needa13b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Farmington, Minnesota
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As long as we're on the subject here, just a little fyi for anyone that doesn't know; Peak Torque ALWAYS occurs at Peak Volumetric Efficiency. Given that, it's easy to understand why Turbo/Supercharging help out Torque alot.
Old 12-31-05, 04:43 AM
  #20  
coolant leak that kills

iTrader: (1)
 
7romanstatesmen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: colorado
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RETed
That is correct IF the torque and hp scales are exactly the same.
Some DynoJet graphs like to scale different torque and hp axes, so be careful about this.


-Ted
alright, that's good to know, so as not become suspicious whenever they don't cross at that point
Old 01-06-06, 10:28 PM
  #21  
Is that thing Turbo?

 
totallimmortal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
sorry but i don't get it, well it's not that i don't get it just the math isn't working out. Lets go with the new passat it has 276hp at 6200 and 266lb-ft at 2750 so if R=(H/T)*5252 then R=(276/266)*5252 that equals 5449.44 which is niether the rpm of the HP or Torque, Assuming it did work out right would R be the rpm of the HP or torque? even with H=T*(R/5252) Then H=266*(6200/5252) that would mean 314hp unless you ment r is the rpm or the torque in which case H=266*(2750/5252) and that would mean 139.28hp
not trying to be a dick just trying to figure out why it won't work for me
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jeff20B
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
73
09-16-18 07:16 PM
RedBaronII
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
4
09-20-15 11:29 AM



Quick Reply: torque?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:56 PM.