TMIC Heat Shield Mod
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,515
Likes: 4
From: San Jose, CA (NorCal/S.F. Bay Area)
I may have to try the stick-on heat shielding to see what the datalogs show. If I drive somewhere, and let the car sit, AFM and IAT temps will tend to be around 100F (on a 70-80F day). So everything under the hood heat soaks, and it takes awhile of driving before cruise temps return to closer to ambient.
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,881
Likes: 3
From: Jacksonville, Tampa & Tallahassee
I'd take one dyno video over all the honorable "mentions" on the forum, not to mention I'm pretty sure that engine blew up iirc.
Nonetheless, I never said higher hp levels couldn't be achieved on the tmic, simply that it becomes increasingly inefficient and there are better solutions out there. I'm sure BDC could have run a little more meth and done away w/ the tmic altogether and had better results. Regardless of how cool the charge is the size limitations of the tmic and the inefficiency of the core negatively affect performace.
Even on BDC's alleged 440whp run he was running like 27psi:
: For one thing this is only possible by running AI as intake temps would skyrocket on the tmic. Coincidentally if not for the restriction of the tmic piping and pressure drop of the core he would not have need 27psi to generate those power figures.
Modifying the stock tmic with the appropriate sized piping would be a relatively easy task, and certainly no one at the inspection center would be any wiser.
Either way I look forward to your results.
Nonetheless, I never said higher hp levels couldn't be achieved on the tmic, simply that it becomes increasingly inefficient and there are better solutions out there. I'm sure BDC could have run a little more meth and done away w/ the tmic altogether and had better results. Regardless of how cool the charge is the size limitations of the tmic and the inefficiency of the core negatively affect performace.
Even on BDC's alleged 440whp run he was running like 27psi:
: For one thing this is only possible by running AI as intake temps would skyrocket on the tmic. Coincidentally if not for the restriction of the tmic piping and pressure drop of the core he would not have need 27psi to generate those power figures. Modifying the stock tmic with the appropriate sized piping would be a relatively easy task, and certainly no one at the inspection center would be any wiser.
Either way I look forward to your results.
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,600
Likes: 49
From: Norcal/Bay Area, CA
As mentioned before, the velocity of the air going through the IC is much higher and transfers less heat. You'd need to do something to increase the amount of exposed cooling area. Unfortunately, your options are are very limited by the top mount packaging.
The pressure drops mentioned above come from places where airflow transitions from a large volume to smaller. Namely the transitions between the intake side end tank into the cooling tubes, the exit side tank to outlet pipe, and the TB inlet to butterfly sections. The transitions need to be smoothed as much as possible, but doing so is not cost effective for manufacturing. Sure it can be done in a custom one-off job, but there's probably easier options out there.
edit: I too would love to see datalogs at different psi's to see if temps change. If someone is feeling really ambitious,*cough* RotaryRocket88 *cough* maybe set up a pre-TMIC AIT sensor and compare it to post TMIC. It wouldn't have to be simultaneous, just back to back runs would give great data.
The out-of-control temperatures are the area that can be addressed more easily than the airflow restrictions. High temps will blow the engine, while restriction will just reduce peak performance. For airflow improvements, I'd have to agree with RXSpeed16. If you enlarge the endtanks and inlet/outlet, you should see some improvement, but the fact remains that the core is still really small. When you're in cramming 2-3x as much air as the car made when it rolled off the line, it'll clearly reach a point of diminishing returns.
edit: I too would love to see datalogs at different psi's to see if temps change. If someone is feeling really ambitious,*cough* RotaryRocket88 *cough* maybe set up a pre-TMIC AIT sensor and compare it to post TMIC. It wouldn't have to be simultaneous, just back to back runs would give great data.
An easier one would be to measure pressure drop with this high airflow. All that would take is routing my boost gauge pre-intercooler for a run. I know what peak boost is currently, and I could just compare the two. A little crude, but better than nothing.
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,881
Likes: 3
From: Jacksonville, Tampa & Tallahassee
Convenient that that video was posted today
and by the magical Judge Ito no less (300 whp on a stock turbo = magic).
For your goals, AI and the tmic should work well. What I was getting at was that at power levels higher than 300-315 the tmic is doing more harm than good, and running straight AI would yield superior performance. If you live in cali, this could be easily accomplished much the same way some test pipes are made to look like cats.
It would be interesting to see the pressure drop as airflow increases.
and by the magical Judge Ito no less (300 whp on a stock turbo = magic). For your goals, AI and the tmic should work well. What I was getting at was that at power levels higher than 300-315 the tmic is doing more harm than good, and running straight AI would yield superior performance. If you live in cali, this could be easily accomplished much the same way some test pipes are made to look like cats.
It would be interesting to see the pressure drop as airflow increases.
TMIC temperature logs with & without water injection moved here: https://www.rx7club.com/2nd-generati...ic-ai-1005319/
just an idea, on top of heat shield mod, would it be possible to custom fabricate using heat resistant material an actual heat shield that close the TMIC atmosphere from engine and rubber seals around the inlet and outlet pipe?
an simple illustration
an simple illustration
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 6,096
Likes: 9
From: So Cal where the OC/LA/SB counties meet
Interested idea, but I think the issue is heat coming up from the bottom, not at it from the sides. But anything that helps deal with heat soak in any way is something to consider.
I just added head shielding to my HKS TMIC. Next stop, ceramic coating the end tanks and heat shielding. Then I intend on adding the thread subject stick on heat insullation to the bottom of the added shielding.
The HKS TMIC has the bigger end tanks discussed above not to mention larger inlet and exit ports.
I know, I'm a contrarian to even consider staying with a TMIC design. But I really like the clean and simple design of a TMIC especially considering the very short IC pipe connections, so going the improve-on-stock route. Goal is daily driven 300rwhp running a P1000 and HKS T04E kit I picked up. So I'm considering water injection as well.
Thoughts?
I just added head shielding to my HKS TMIC. Next stop, ceramic coating the end tanks and heat shielding. Then I intend on adding the thread subject stick on heat insullation to the bottom of the added shielding.
The HKS TMIC has the bigger end tanks discussed above not to mention larger inlet and exit ports.
I know, I'm a contrarian to even consider staying with a TMIC design. But I really like the clean and simple design of a TMIC especially considering the very short IC pipe connections, so going the improve-on-stock route. Goal is daily driven 300rwhp running a P1000 and HKS T04E kit I picked up. So I'm considering water injection as well.
Thoughts?
Interested idea, but I think the issue is heat coming up from the bottom, not at it from the sides. But anything that helps deal with heat soak in any way is something to consider.
I just added head shielding to my HKS TMIC. Next stop, ceramic coating the end tanks and heat shielding. Then I intend on adding the thread subject stick on heat insullation to the bottom of the added shielding.
The HKS TMIC has the bigger end tanks discussed above not to mention larger inlet and exit ports.
I know, I'm a contrarian to even consider staying with a TMIC design. But I really like the clean and simple design of a TMIC especially considering the very short IC pipe connections, so going the improve-on-stock route. Goal is daily driven 300rwhp running a P1000 and HKS T04E kit I picked up. So I'm considering water injection as well.
Thoughts?
I just added head shielding to my HKS TMIC. Next stop, ceramic coating the end tanks and heat shielding. Then I intend on adding the thread subject stick on heat insullation to the bottom of the added shielding.
The HKS TMIC has the bigger end tanks discussed above not to mention larger inlet and exit ports.
I know, I'm a contrarian to even consider staying with a TMIC design. But I really like the clean and simple design of a TMIC especially considering the very short IC pipe connections, so going the improve-on-stock route. Goal is daily driven 300rwhp running a P1000 and HKS T04E kit I picked up. So I'm considering water injection as well.
Thoughts?
heat soak from bottom (either bottom or sidewall of the heat shield would have some sort of vent to allow the air to pass through into the engine to insure optimal flow) would be covered by heat shield as well, this heat shield should cover all parts of TMIC and just have the inlet and out let pops out.
Combine with water injection, the IAT would be even lower. Now just need to come up with a better flow better cooling TMIC and we would have a safe running 350 whp TMIC setup. I am really digging the improve the stock design route as well. If those challenges (heat soak, insufficient flow, insufficient cooling beyond stock) for TMIC can be overcome, I think TMIC would be the best IC setup.
Last edited by DairokutenMaoh; Sep 10, 2012 at 11:26 PM.
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,600
Likes: 49
From: Norcal/Bay Area, CA
heat soak from bottom (either bottom or sidewall of the heat shield would have some sort of vent to allow the air to pass through into the engine to insure optimal flow) would be covered by heat shield as well, this heat shield should cover all parts of TMIC and just have the inlet and out let pops out.
Combine with water injection, the IAT would be even lower. Now just need to come up with a better flow better cooling TMIC and we would have a safe running 350 whp TMIC setup. I am really digging the improve the stock design route as well. If those challenges (heat soak, insufficient flow, insufficient cooling beyond stock) for TMIC can be overcome, I think TMIC would be the best IC setup.
Combine with water injection, the IAT would be even lower. Now just need to come up with a better flow better cooling TMIC and we would have a safe running 350 whp TMIC setup. I am really digging the improve the stock design route as well. If those challenges (heat soak, insufficient flow, insufficient cooling beyond stock) for TMIC can be overcome, I think TMIC would be the best IC setup.
Don't forget that the intercooler itself is getting heat from the compressed air inside of it, not just from external components. Any part of the ic in contact with air acts as a heat transfer surface. So the more the better. Boxing it in would slow airflow and trap heat inside. Basically it would act like a jacket.
Insulating the bottom surface is helpful, but it was mostly addressed with the stock heat shield. Your idea to box in the IC has merit, but this adhesive tape just takes your box and vacuum seals it onto the surface of the IC.
Heat soak is going to happen no matter what because it does not have anything to drive air through it at rest. That's why radiators have fans.
came across this intercooler
JDM Mazda RX7 FC3S SMIC Intercooler aftermarket mazdaspeed re amemiya arc | eBay
It's basically two OEM TMIC welded on top of each other with bigger pipe.
JDM Mazda RX7 FC3S SMIC Intercooler aftermarket mazdaspeed re amemiya arc | eBay
It's basically two OEM TMIC welded on top of each other with bigger pipe.
Interested idea, but I think the issue is heat coming up from the bottom, not at it from the sides. But anything that helps deal with heat soak in any way is something to consider.
I just added head shielding to my HKS TMIC. Next stop, ceramic coating the end tanks and heat shielding. Then I intend on adding the thread subject stick on heat insullation to the bottom of the added shielding.
The HKS TMIC has the bigger end tanks discussed above not to mention larger inlet and exit ports.
I know, I'm a contrarian to even consider staying with a TMIC design. But I really like the clean and simple design of a TMIC especially considering the very short IC pipe connections, so going the improve-on-stock route. Goal is daily driven 300rwhp running a P1000 and HKS T04E kit I picked up. So I'm considering water injection as well.
Thoughts?
I just added head shielding to my HKS TMIC. Next stop, ceramic coating the end tanks and heat shielding. Then I intend on adding the thread subject stick on heat insullation to the bottom of the added shielding.
The HKS TMIC has the bigger end tanks discussed above not to mention larger inlet and exit ports.
I know, I'm a contrarian to even consider staying with a TMIC design. But I really like the clean and simple design of a TMIC especially considering the very short IC pipe connections, so going the improve-on-stock route. Goal is daily driven 300rwhp running a P1000 and HKS T04E kit I picked up. So I'm considering water injection as well.
Thoughts?
I don't think you'll have trouble with your goal, but I would highly recommend AI. Despite the improved efficiency of the compressor on my hybrid, the shear volume of air proved to just be too much for the TMIC to cool. 180 degree IATs after 10 seconds of WOT is scary.
came across this intercooler
JDM Mazda RX7 FC3S SMIC Intercooler aftermarket mazdaspeed re amemiya arc | eBay
It's basically two OEM TMIC welded on top of each other with bigger pipe.
JDM Mazda RX7 FC3S SMIC Intercooler aftermarket mazdaspeed re amemiya arc | eBay
It's basically two OEM TMIC welded on top of each other with bigger pipe.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jeff20B
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
73
Sep 16, 2018 07:16 PM
7upra
New Member RX-7 Technical
5
Mar 25, 2018 11:32 AM
ZaqAtaq
New Member RX-7 Technical
2
Sep 5, 2015 08:57 PM







