2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Tires!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 21, 2003 | 05:39 AM
  #1  
Kuhrazy7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
From: So Cal
Tires!

Hey wudup...Im looking to buy tires for my s5 TII wheels im planning on 205/50/16 (front 225/50/16 (rear) Now i cant decide between Yokohama Es100s or Dunlop FM901s or Azenis FK451's I just wanna know whos had experience running these on ur fc? And which choice seems the best. im looking for good grip/with some rain traction. if any of u have tested these tires or are currently running all info is greatly appreciated. THX ALot!
Reply
Old May 21, 2003 | 07:44 AM
  #2  
afro thunder's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: Florida
I have the yoko ES100's, and those are really good tires. The tires that my car came with were a horrible tread design, and when these were put on, it was like a new car. They also have good rain handling, too. I got a good deal $75 a tire, on tirerack.com
Reply
Old May 21, 2003 | 08:59 AM
  #3  
Turbonut's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,993
Likes: 68
From: NJ
FYI-You may already know the 205 x 50's are only @ 24.1" and the 225 x 50's @24.8. Most run 205 x 55's in front so as diameter the same. If you have ABS, could activate with such a large difference.
Reply
Old May 21, 2003 | 09:23 AM
  #4  
JerryLH3's Avatar
Rabbit hole specialist
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Community Favorite
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,852
Likes: 225
From: Tampa, FL
Or you could just run 225/50 all the way around. Seems to be a popular fitment for all the stock TII wheels.
Reply
Old May 21, 2003 | 10:48 AM
  #5  
Turbonut's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,993
Likes: 68
From: NJ
Correct, but depending upon the cross section width, some makes of 225/50 will not fit upfront, without some work/modifications.
Reply
Old May 21, 2003 | 10:52 AM
  #6  
SureShot's Avatar
Seduced by the DARK SIDE
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 7,323
Likes: 2
From: Orange Park FL (near Jax)
Originally posted by Turbonut
Correct, but depending upon the cross section width, some makes of 225/50 will not fit upfront, without some work/modifications.
All I had to do on my 87 was nick about 1/8" off the lip of the spring perch with an angle grinder.
Reply
Old May 21, 2003 | 11:36 AM
  #7  
Turbonut's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,993
Likes: 68
From: NJ
That's correct, a little grinding does wonders, again depending on the make. The Michelins I had a while back (225 x 50's) would have never fit with only .125" off.
Reply
Old May 21, 2003 | 02:33 PM
  #8  
Kuhrazy7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
From: So Cal
Yea i was considering 205/55 up front and 225/50 in back.but im also wondering which tire wud be better, im definately considering the es100s tho.
Reply
Old May 21, 2003 | 02:54 PM
  #9  
BDoty311's Avatar
88 AE
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,865
Likes: 0
From: N/A
I got the Yokos not too long ago, and traction increase is night and day. But then again I went from 205/50/15s to 225/50/15s so that might be it. I consider the Yokos a really good bargain and perform good in dry/wet.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rx7jocke
Suspension/Wheels/Tires/Brakes
72
Jun 17, 2016 03:48 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:26 PM.