2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

tII intake on N/A motor

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 12, 2003 | 06:26 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: N.J.
tII intake on N/A motor

can the TII intake bolt on to the n/a motor or does it need to be modified
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2003 | 06:41 PM
  #2  
Icemark's Avatar
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 24
From: Rohnert Park CA
Turbo uses 4 intake ports, NA uses 6...

The intake would not match
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2003 | 07:15 PM
  #3  
stinkfist's Avatar
Learn to swim.
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,301
Likes: 0
From: Mobile,AL
I know of a guy who port matched the lower T2 intake to a 6 port motor. He just opened the port enough to cover the 5th and 6th ports. He runs a T2 set up on a N/A motor.

Mike
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2003 | 11:27 PM
  #4  
Icemark's Avatar
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 24
From: Rohnert Park CA
Originally posted by stinkfist
I know of a guy who port matched the lower T2 intake to a 6 port motor. He just opened the port enough to cover the 5th and 6th ports. He runs a T2 set up on a N/A motor.

Mike
I would think a better approach would be using a NA lower manifold and custom matching it to a T2 upper manifold/dynamic surge/TB.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2003 | 01:09 AM
  #5  
j200pruf's Avatar
RIP Icemark
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,481
Likes: 1
From: Aloha OR
Yeah I was wondering about using the UIM/dynamic surge/TB on my N/A. It looks like the TII parts have shorter runner and would therefore help Hi-End Performance, anyone willing to aggree?
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2003 | 01:38 AM
  #6  
Suds7's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 513
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, California
I think longer runners are better for high rpm.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2003 | 01:46 AM
  #7  
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta.Georgia
um no that wont work. and it would be a waist of time. jsut go with the 89 n/a manifold. that will give u some hp
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2003 | 02:53 AM
  #8  
j200pruf's Avatar
RIP Icemark
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,481
Likes: 1
From: Aloha OR
First, I read on the fourm that shorter is better.

And why wouldn't it give you any gains? Give a little insight would you please.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2003 | 02:59 AM
  #9  
slidingsky's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
From: Honolulu
NA lower manifold wont clear the turbo and manifold, right. Wasnt someone doing a conversion with the NA manifold? I think he had to make a spacer to bump the turbo out further. Then the wastegate actuator woundt clear the frame rail.
I think your better off with a real TII motor or just a TII intake manifold.
sky
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hotshot2014
New Member RX-7 Technical
8
Jul 18, 2017 02:30 PM
immanuel__7
Canadian Forum
5
Sep 2, 2015 08:26 AM
Professorpeanutrx7
New Member RX-7 Technical
5
Aug 15, 2015 01:38 PM
KAL797
Test Area 51
0
Aug 11, 2015 03:47 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:16 AM.