2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

tial BOV mounted in trottle body plenum pics

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 26, 2007 | 05:38 PM
  #1  
680RWHP12A's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,666
Likes: 2
From: chatsworth,Ca.
tial BOV mounted in trottle body plenum pics

well we were stuck with an aluminum BOV flange so i had to find a place to make it work, well since the intercooler piping is steel there was slim pickins on mounting choices.. so, this is what i came up with, what do you think? looks cool





Reply
Old May 26, 2007 | 05:51 PM
  #2  
stevensimon's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,575
Likes: 6
From: salt lake ut
interesting.. looks good though
Reply
Old May 26, 2007 | 05:54 PM
  #3  
KNONFS's Avatar
B O R I C U A
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,482
Likes: 36
From: VA
Originally Posted by 680RWHP12A
well we were stuck with an aluminum BOV flange so i had to find a place to make it work, well since the intercooler piping is steel there was slim pickins on mounting choices.. so, this is what i came up with, what do you think? looks cool





AWESOME!

I've seen it on "carb hats" before, but never on the stock TB, on any case we need to see the rest of the pics, please
Reply
Old May 26, 2007 | 07:09 PM
  #4  
upatnight's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
From: royal oak,MI
nice work looks great
Reply
Old May 26, 2007 | 11:23 PM
  #5  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Interesting, but why have you grounded the UIM? No components use it as a ground path...
Reply
Old May 30, 2007 | 08:38 PM
  #6  
stevensimon's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,575
Likes: 6
From: salt lake ut
can never have enough grounds
Reply
Old May 30, 2007 | 09:13 PM
  #7  
Spectator's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,315
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Originally Posted by stevensimon
can never have enough grounds
Wrong.

http://www.aaroncake.net/RX-7/grounding.htm

Read this.

But Kudos, looks good man.
Reply
Old May 30, 2007 | 09:21 PM
  #8  
marcus219's Avatar
FC Mobsta
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,825
Likes: 2
From: Olympia, WA
Originally Posted by NZConvertible
Interesting, but why have you grounded the UIM? No components use it as a ground path...
wouldn't that just be a chassis-engine ground? where would be a better spot? firewall to tranny/iron? ill effects?
Reply
Old May 30, 2007 | 09:37 PM
  #9  
marcus219's Avatar
FC Mobsta
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,825
Likes: 2
From: Olympia, WA
if ill things ground from batt. to chassis........and the motor is bolted to the chassis.

i read that deal on aaron cakes page (good as always) but ill have to look through some of my electrical books cuz im confused hehe
Reply
Old May 31, 2007 | 01:35 AM
  #10  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Originally Posted by stevensimon
can never have enough grounds
But you can have pointless ground wires that do nothing but clutter up the engine bay...

Originally Posted by marcus219
wouldn't that just be a chassis-engine ground?
Sure, but why not put it on the engine instead, so the wire could be shorter and less visable. There's no electrical advantage to grounding the manifold.
Reply
Old May 31, 2007 | 01:44 AM
  #11  
eriksseven's Avatar
Make Money.
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,137
Likes: 9
From: Seattle
Originally Posted by 680RWHP12A
Wow, that placement just looks bad-***. Good work!
Reply
Old May 31, 2007 | 05:06 PM
  #12  
marcus219's Avatar
FC Mobsta
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,825
Likes: 2
From: Olympia, WA
Originally Posted by NZConvertible
But you can have pointless ground wires that do nothing but clutter up the engine bay...

Sure, but why not put it on the engine instead, so the wire could be shorter and less visable. There's no electrical advantage to grounding the manifold.
gotcha. thanks man
Reply
Old May 31, 2007 | 05:10 PM
  #13  
Node's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,383
Likes: 3
From: Stinson Beach, Ca
Looks like the ideal spot for a blow off valve and not so much a lack of choice for placement.
I don't think it would affect anything being so close to the TB butterlies

Two thumbs up
Reply
Old May 31, 2007 | 05:11 PM
  #14  
classicauto's Avatar
Crash Auto?Fix Auto.
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 7,831
Likes: 2
From: Hagersville Ontario
!NICE!

Now do it with a Turbo XS BOV and have it sticking through hood
Reply
Old May 31, 2007 | 06:47 PM
  #15  
marcus219's Avatar
FC Mobsta
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,825
Likes: 2
From: Olympia, WA
Originally Posted by Node
Looks like the ideal spot for a blow off valve and not so much a lack of choice for placement.
I don't think it would affect anything being so close to the TB butterlies

Two thumbs up
it'd better for BOV response wouldn't it? thats right where the spike in pressure comes from telling mr bov to let the pressure out. hahah

your sig is hilarious.

its the "i just want bang bang bang" remixxx
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2007 | 08:35 AM
  #16  
synergy7's Avatar
______
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
From: Florida
The vacuum line is what gives the bov its response, having it close to the intake manifold may look nice but has no better affect. My logic would be to put it on the turbo side so the dumped air would pre cooled hot air anyway.
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2007 | 01:13 PM
  #17  
Digi7ech's Avatar
I break Diff mounts
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,403
Likes: 4
From: Avondale, Arizona
^and you have no clue about air charges and pressure waves.
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2007 | 01:35 PM
  #18  
that nissan guy's Avatar
cheap ass
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
From: Boulder, CO
Originally Posted by Digi7ech
^and you have no clue about air charges and pressure waves.
+1

physics major ftw
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2007 | 01:39 PM
  #19  
PvillKnight7's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,597
Likes: 3
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by synergy7
The vacuum line is what gives the bov its response, having it close to the intake manifold may look nice but has no better affect. My logic would be to put it on the turbo side so the dumped air would pre cooled hot air anyway.
what is this rambling garbage?

read up on your fluids and thermodynamics son
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2007 | 02:24 PM
  #20  
Nick_d_TII's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,620
Likes: 6
From: Beaverton, OR
Nice, looks good!

But...

You thermodynamics and physics major dudes are annoying and always saying that ****, "read up on thermodynamics and fluid dynamics". How the hell are we supposed to read all that crap. I can barely understand half of the lingo and associated formulas with that stuff. Why dont you tell him why since your so smart? The vacuum line does give the Blow off valve its source of pressure differences which allows it to open.
Where its located really doesn't matter, as long as it functions correctly. I'd like to see your calculations, explanations, and diagrams if you beg to differ.

Sorry, but If your going to correct someone, please give them a reason, explanation, or diagram or your just talking(typing) out your ***...
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2007 | 04:46 PM
  #21  
Evil Aviator's Avatar
Rotorhead
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 39
From: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
I guess you can't get any closer to the throttle plates than that, lol.

It makes me wonder:
1. Would it work better due to the deflection angle of the reversion off the closed throttle plate?
2. Would it work worse due to being TOO close to the throttle plate and the bulk of the reversion wave initially bypasses the BOV?
3. Does it even make a difference at all?

Hmm, interesting.
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2007 | 06:20 PM
  #22  
veedubbed's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
From: USA
Ideally, the BOV should be as close to the butterflies as possible as to not interrupt flow. Looks like you pretty much got it. Haha.
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2007 | 10:18 PM
  #23  
that nissan guy's Avatar
cheap ass
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
From: Boulder, CO
Originally Posted by Nick_d_TII
Nice, looks good!

But...

You thermodynamics and physics major dudes are annoying and always saying that ****, "read up on thermodynamics and fluid dynamics". How the hell are we supposed to read all that crap. I can barely understand half of the lingo and associated formulas with that stuff. Why dont you tell him why since your so smart? The vacuum line does give the Blow off valve its source of pressure differences which allows it to open.
Where its located really doesn't matter, as long as it functions correctly. I'd like to see your calculations, explanations, and diagrams if you beg to differ.

Sorry, but If your going to correct someone, please give them a reason, explanation, or diagram or your just talking(typing) out your ***...
you say you would like to see some calculations, explanations, and diagrams? didnt you just say
Originally Posted by Nick_d_TII
How the hell are we supposed to read all that crap. I can barely understand half of the lingo and associated formulas with that stuff"
id hate to post up more of that CRAP youre talking about
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:12 PM.