2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

diff in na suspension and turbo 2 susp.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-11-07, 11:01 PM
  #1  
rexsleven
Thread Starter
 
rexsleven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: kalispell Montana
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
diff in na suspension and turbo 2 susp.

i was noticing that my n/a fc. is just as low as my friends turbo 2 and i have the eibach lowering springs on mine. i was just wonderin why are they different. is it the springs or whatever. and what i need to do. to get my fc as low as a t2?
Old 12-11-07, 11:18 PM
  #2  
Lives on the Forum

 
Black91n/a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 5,707
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Springs sag over time, his suspension is probably sagged, or it's not stock, or the springs have been cut. Turbos are also heavier, making them sit lower.
Old 12-11-07, 11:29 PM
  #3  
Automatic = Power drain

 
NoDOHC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My one friend actually raised his car with Eibach 0.8 inch lowering springs. He used to drag coming in the driveway and after the spring upgrade, he didn't.

My car was lower than his before and considerably lower after. (Bone stock.)

Springs sag quite a bit over time, expecially considering that my car could have voted in the last presidential election.
Old 12-12-07, 10:37 PM
  #4  
rexsleven
Thread Starter
 
rexsleven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: kalispell Montana
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well. the springs came with my car. so i wouldn't know if it would raise it or drop it. but thanx for the info
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BNR34RB26DETT
Build Threads
42
02-28-18 11:27 AM



Quick Reply: diff in na suspension and turbo 2 susp.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:42 PM.