2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

thinking about doing this...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 10, 2008 | 05:27 PM
  #26  
*TOUCH*'s Avatar
Project P --- Pedospeed
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 0
From: Norfolk, VA
+1 on the clutch
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2008 | 06:43 PM
  #27  
KhanArtisT's Avatar
Former FC enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,841
Likes: 2
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by SirCygnus
Turning up the boost ***** nilly is a no no.

250 is more than doable with stock components. someone threw down 240 WHP on a stock t2 with turbo on 87 octane.

An ems is a good upgrade period.

an rtek is a fuel controller.

SHEESH.
Why is it a no-no? People run 12psi all the time, just make sure you have the fuel for it. A stock TII will not dyno 240whp, period. An EMS is a good upgrade if you plan on going big turbo later, for ~20whp max its not the most bang for the buck mod on a stock turbo car. An RTEK 1.X is NOT a fuel controller, it is a chip that lets the ECU be aware that larger injectors are being run.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2008 | 02:17 PM
  #28  
t24todd's Avatar
RE_p Rotors
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 950
Likes: 0
From: Newport News/Fredericksburg
waiting for the rtek 2.1 with afm deleted.....then my tuning will begin only reason i havnt purchased it yet is for the afm..

op follow my steps and you wont have to redo anything..its a great step 1 for you and will satisfy your needs for a while and lets you build from each step
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2008 | 05:13 PM
  #29  
*TOUCH*'s Avatar
Project P --- Pedospeed
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 0
From: Norfolk, VA
Originally Posted by KhanArtisT
An RTEK 1.X is NOT a fuel controller, it is a chip that lets the ECU be aware that larger injectors are being run.

yes, i dont kno why ppl keep saying other wise. rtek1.x IS IN FACT A CHIP so you can run diff injectors without a fuel controller. its main purpose is to replace the need for such items. also has the benefit of biult fcd, lower secondary injector staging, etc. its all on their site..
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2008 | 05:55 PM
  #30  
Spock's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
From: Cold Spring, KY
Originally Posted by ITSWILL
well I don't think Its a bad "stage 1.

You don't really need the oil pressure gauge.

The racing beat exhaust claims that 60 hp because you can make more boost with their exhaust over factory exhaust. I love the way mine sounds.

10psi is just fine.

One of my cars is basically the same setup except it has a fmic and it is a blast to drive, plenty of power. My other car is more like what would be your "stage 4"

As far as upgradeability is concerned I think you are doing good if your stage 3 is 350-400 whp.

To get from your stage one to stage 3 I would do a wideband 02 an egt gauge a bnr stage 4 turbo, a FMIC, a walbro 255, move the secondarys to primaries and get some 1200s for the secondaries. You could probably also get away with upgrading the 1.7 to a 2.1 (by that time rtek may have the afm delete).

As far as a radiator is concerned, I wouldn't worry about it at stage 1 unless to get a front mount, but it wouldn't hurt either.

Also worth noting is that if you ever want to get out of that 350-400 ho range, you will need a full standalone a set of 1600s another fuel pump setup, custom downpipe, new turbo, turbo manifold and a bunch of other stuff. You might seriously consider a roll cage at that point too. I guess my point is that from stage 3 to stage 4 (if you are even considering something like that) is a much bigger leap you you might think, it was definitely more than I thought it would be.

Also you may consider an upgraded clutch even at stage 1.
Thanks for the input!
Ok so what I am getting form what you are saying is that this is a decent start. Also to ditch the oil pressure gauge, get the RB REV II, forget about the radiator and possibly get a EGT. I think you missed that I was planning on getting a wideband O2. Oh yeah and to start thinking about a clutch.

Also I am getting from you is that my 350-400 whp is a good goal to shoot for and that going above that will have to wait until I have a lot more money and time.

Last edited by Spock; Dec 11, 2008 at 06:05 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2008 | 06:01 PM
  #31  
ITSWILL's Avatar
Wiring Nightmare
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,714
Likes: 2
From: Ortonville, MI
That's it.

You most likely wont need another radiator, but do keep an eye on the temp gauge.
If you notice you are running hot get one.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2008 | 06:10 PM
  #32  
Spock's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
From: Cold Spring, KY
Originally Posted by t24todd
waiting for the rtek 2.1 with afm deleted.....then my tuning will begin only reason i havnt purchased it yet is for the afm..

op follow my steps and you wont have to redo anything..its a great step 1 for you and will satisfy your needs for a while and lets you build from each step
well like I said I will likely do all of these mods at the same time to eliminate having any problems with having to redo anything. I agree I think this "stage" will certainly satisfy my needs for a while and get me more antiquated with rx7's
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2008 | 06:28 PM
  #33  
KhanArtisT's Avatar
Former FC enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,841
Likes: 2
From: Northern VA
350-400whp is not a good goal, maybe I missed something. You can make max 260whp with a stock turbo with this stage, anything more will require lots of money and time.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2008 | 06:31 PM
  #34  
ITSWILL's Avatar
Wiring Nightmare
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,714
Likes: 2
From: Ortonville, MI
350-400 is his final goal not his present goal.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2008 | 07:06 PM
  #35  
Spock's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
From: Cold Spring, KY
yeah 350-400 is not the current goal.
just brought that up to make sure what I wanted to do wasn't going to cause any repeat purchases in the future.


here is something to throw into the mix....found this and it is local.
What do you guys think? Better idea then what I am thinking or more of a hassle?
https://www.rx7club.com/showthread.p...56#post8789156
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2008 | 07:24 PM
  #36  
ITSWILL's Avatar
Wiring Nightmare
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,714
Likes: 2
From: Ortonville, MI
seems like its worth the money, but if I were you I would spend the money elsewhere.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2008 | 07:30 PM
  #37  
Spock's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
From: Cold Spring, KY
i was just curious because my buddy is trying to get me to buy it basically just for the turbo. He doesn't really think realistically very often however.

lol back to studying
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2008 | 09:16 PM
  #38  
KhanArtisT's Avatar
Former FC enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,841
Likes: 2
From: Northern VA
Unless your engine has low compression there is no way in hell I'd buy that. A T28 is a freaking tiny *** turbo, it barely looks bigger than stock.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2008 | 11:41 PM
  #39  
Indyparts's Avatar
Group buy Vendor
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,058
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis, IN
Don't turn the boost up to high. That is a good way to get yourself back to Stage 1/2 with a rebuild.
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2008 | 04:10 PM
  #40  
Spock's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
From: Cold Spring, KY
Originally Posted by Indyparts
Don't turn the boost up to high. That is a good way to get yourself back to Stage 1/2 with a rebuild.
yeah thats what all the supporting mods are for as well as the wideband and the boost gauge.
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2008 | 07:37 PM
  #41  
IBuildFast's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: Washington
cant always go off what the turbo size LOOKS like. its just a comp cover. scope the numbers on the turbo about whats inside. not saying a t28 is big, cause i dont think you would make 400 wheel with that...or i know you wouldnt.

supporting mods and good tune +1 to that.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2008 | 10:31 PM
  #42  
Spock's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
From: Cold Spring, KY
so how big should I port the wastegate? And should I do this myself or do I need to have a shop do it?

Also, what wideband?
Prosport just came out with theirs
http://prosportgauges.com/wideband-a...ratio-kit.aspx

innovative which can be used with any gauge
http://www.innovatemotorsports.com/products/lc1.php

Last edited by Spock; Dec 13, 2008 at 10:59 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2008 | 09:55 AM
  #43  
*TOUCH*'s Avatar
Project P --- Pedospeed
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 0
From: Norfolk, VA
go for the innovate. they are tried and true and one of the most accurate (+/- .1 afr) on the market. AND they are relatively inexpensive. you can find complete setups WITH gauges on here for $250-ish or by it new for like $400 or whatever the cost is with the LC-1 + the gauge. course there always is the AEM unit. never used it but have heard its comparable to innovate in terms of accuracy.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2008 | 09:58 AM
  #44  
*TOUCH*'s Avatar
Project P --- Pedospeed
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 0
From: Norfolk, VA
this was given in response to a thread i started aboutthe turboxs wideband (someone had it for say cheap locally and i had never heard any feedback on it)



just look at all the units that have accurracies worse than +/- .25 afr! sorry but anything above that is just unacceptable to me. especially when there are similarly priced products with better accuracy and ESPECIALLY when you are tuning a rotary

Last edited by *TOUCH*; Dec 14, 2008 at 10:02 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2008 | 10:10 AM
  #45  
HAILERS's Avatar
HAILERS
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 20,563
Likes: 27
From: FORT WORTH, TEXAS,USA
RTEK is not just a fuel controller. It can alter timing and be used with injectors ogther than stock.

Plus, as a fuel controller it is hands down better than a SAFC and its ilk.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2008 | 10:59 AM
  #46  
Spock's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
From: Cold Spring, KY
ok well you sold me on the innovative which I was already leaning towards.

You can get it with the gauge($329) or just the controller($199). I was thinking about getting the basic and hooking up to the prosport A/Fgauge and also getting the prosport boost gauge. Do you think that will decrease the accuracy? I would like to get my gauges to all match but if I can't not the worst thing in the world.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2008 | 05:57 PM
  #47  
*TOUCH*'s Avatar
Project P --- Pedospeed
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 0
From: Norfolk, VA
Originally Posted by HAILERS
RTEK is not just a fuel controller. It can alter timing and be used with injectors ogther than stock.

Plus, as a fuel controller it is hands down better than a SAFC and its ilk.

well you can only control timing on >2.0. but i agree that if you get a 2.0 or 2.1 then it would be superior to a safc, but a cheaper (not equal tho) alternative would be to get a 1.x and use a safc to adjust the fuel, although you still dont get control over timing also another problem with this is idle fuel level. aka you have a 1.7 (that has preset of 550cc primary and 720 sec.) but you have 720cc primaries and 1000cc sec. although you can adjust te fuel maps, you wont be able to set idle fuel amount with the safc. you will be running mega rich at idle since your rtek thinks you have 550cc primaries. the 2.0 and 2.1 allows you to set idle fuel level *i believe*.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2008 | 08:47 PM
  #48  
KhanArtisT's Avatar
Former FC enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,841
Likes: 2
From: Northern VA
The SAFC + RTEK 1.X setup is night and day compared to an RTEK 2.x even though it is only $100 cheaper. It has fuel maps based on load and boost level, not just RPM. MAJOR difference in tuning and how well the car will run. Not to mention the cranking fuel, timing, ability to tune in closed loop, and being able to read all the sensors.

Sucks that I will have to go the first route though just because the S5 TIIs' 2.x isn't out yet.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rgordon1979
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
40
Mar 15, 2022 12:04 PM
Jeff20B
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
73
Sep 16, 2018 07:16 PM
stickmantijuana
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
13
Jan 9, 2018 11:19 AM
Devon300zx
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
15
Sep 16, 2015 06:57 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:04 AM.