2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

t2 swap= no start!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-12-09, 01:34 PM
  #26  
10 pounds sounds so nasty

 
turbo-111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: N.C.
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
wowowowowowow you have a jspec motor did you hook the fuel lines up right ? you had fuel b4 but then you moved the injectors and no fuel now.
on jspec motors the fuel lines are backwards.
the line that comes from the fuel filter goes to the primary, the return goes to the secondary rail.
now you 2 build comp you can go buy some engine oil treatment that stuff is thick, but some inbetween all 6 sufarces on the rotors thro the spark plug holes and see if that doesnt get it to start.
Old 01-12-09, 11:37 PM
  #27  
Junior Member

 
aspec_fc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Asia
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hahaha.....i know i sound entirely crazy with the bulb thing. Well, now we have the jspec harness hook up. Will be testing it and hopefully know what is the problem. Well, i've got a lot of things not hook up like the O2 sensor, the intercooler, emissions stuff are all out,. Yeah....I don't need them all to start the motor. Let's see what happens.
Old 01-13-09, 02:51 AM
  #28  
Junior Member

 
aspec_fc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Asia
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OK. Mine fires up now. Here's the thing. Is not combusting right earlier on (also why it's flooding). The engine's been sitting for too long. And so our assumption is that the rotors are not rotating smoothly making it rough and hard start. Then we put a battery just for the starter. Meaning undivided power to cranking up engine. Once it fires up, massive amount of white smokes comes out (as most of you guys know). Now is idling alright. A little rough. Needs some fine tuning. Once the engine starts going smoothly, it'll start up a lot easier.

Basically, try hooking up a battery just for the starter to see if it cranks better. Will take a few tries to get it fire up. Good luck!
Old 01-13-09, 08:31 AM
  #29  
The Ceaseless Discharge

Thread Starter
 
linchpin360's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Metairie, LA
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dot_txt
Epic... Simply Epic...



Ground checking is good.. Except he stated he already checked for spark.. Since the other symptoms are not symptoms of bad grounding I think we can dismiss this.



No..



You don't need the knock sensor to start the car, especially if your using an N/A ECU.

This thread is full of fail..

To the OP: Try with starting fluid. See if it at least sputters. Do a compression test as well. Report back your findings.

I tried it with starting fluid, i got a couple puffs of white smoke. I have a theory though.

It sounds like it isnt in time. My theory is that the e-shaft pulley is on wrong. Either the key-way is sheared off or just missing altogether. On the pulley there are two marks that have been painted on the front the same distance from each other as the timing notches. The paint marks are about 120* away from the real marks. I'll post pics of this on friday I hope. Which leads me to my next ? are the n/a and turbo e-shaft pulley's the same?
Old 01-13-09, 04:42 PM
  #30  
I blame the TPS

 
Chris Boots's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: MT
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by linchpin360
I tried it with starting fluid, i got a couple puffs of white smoke. I have a theory though.

It sounds like it isnt in time. My theory is that the e-shaft pulley is on wrong. Either the key-way is sheared off or just missing altogether. On the pulley there are two marks that have been painted on the front the same distance from each other as the timing notches. The paint marks are about 120* away from the real marks. I'll post pics of this on friday I hope. Which leads me to my next ? are the n/a and turbo e-shaft pulley's the same?
There's really no way the main pulley could be on wrong and I kinda doubt the keyway sheared off cause that would take a lot of force not even put on the pulley in the first place. Never have I seen a sheared key way and a pulley with opposite timing marks. The timing marks are about 10mm's from each other, not opposite of each other. You can put your NA pulley on it if you want just make sure you torque it to the correct spec or you can over crush the copper washer behind the main bolt and then that develops a nasty oil slinging leak.

You NA harness shouldn't be the problem. we've been doing S5 turbo swaps forever with not really any problem. Rotaryreserection can qoute me on that.

The N374 ECU are always problematic on our US or Canada car. The common problem with using a N374 is they don't send and impulse to the rear rotor injector. The only proven fix for the N374 ECU is to chip it. I personally have taken a N374 ECU and chipped it with a knightsport chip for my customer's cars when they decide they don't wanna go standalone or find a N370 for their swap.

The N351 ECU should at least send an impulse to both the front and rear rotor injectors. But in the case that you get it running with the N351 (NA) ecu don't hardly boost the car because the map is too lean and is designed for the NA engine, not the turbo engine. Meaning start looking for a N370 ECU.

So he used a standard light bulb for checking injector impulse and he said too bright? Like Hailers said "You're kidding right?"

The tool I use for checking injector impulse is made by snapon and it doesn't even plug into anything. it has a long thin rod that is set ontop of the injector on the car pluged in and it senses the injectors pulses and flashes and beeps to the pulses.

Have you tested the injectors? If you're wondering how to do that you can A: grab a drink and a snack and study the service manual and go through its fuel section, Or B: take a battery like a 9v and then take a leads to both prongs in the injector and one lead to positve on the battery and the other to the negative. When you connect the wire you will hear the injector click indicating the valve is opperative and presumably a good injector. The injector could be dirty though and that would flood sooner.

Its not easy to mix up the injector connectors on the harness. either secondary or primary connectors, you'd have to do some work to mix them up. You could in theory mix front and rear connectors up but that wouldn't do anything to keep it from starting or even firing.

So from what I've gained from your input you're getting spark across the board. One easy mistake is actually mixing the the trailing front and rear spark plug wires, although the car will run with them mixed up just rough though. but it can make a flooded car even harder to start.

So with an interesting main pulley it beggs the question of, what mark are you setting the CAS to? There's a good chance your timing isn't even near close. You can try the NA pulley and then set the cas to its marks.

Pics would help a little to imagining what you got going on.
Old 01-13-09, 06:36 PM
  #31  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Delicious's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Manteca, CA
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Chris Boots
There's really no way the main pulley could be on wrong and I kinda doubt the keyway sheared off cause that would take a lot of force not even put on the pulley in the first place. Never have I seen a sheared key way and a pulley with opposite timing marks. The timing marks are about 10mm's from each other, not opposite of each other. You can put your NA pulley on it if you want just make sure you torque it to the correct spec or you can over crush the copper washer behind the main bolt and then that develops a nasty oil slinging leak.

You NA harness shouldn't be the problem. we've been doing S5 turbo swaps forever with not really any problem. Rotaryreserection can qoute me on that.

The N374 ECU are always problematic on our US or Canada car. The common problem with using a N374 is they don't send and impulse to the rear rotor injector. The only proven fix for the N374 ECU is to chip it. I personally have taken a N374 ECU and chipped it with a knightsport chip for my customer's cars when they decide they don't wanna go standalone or find a N370 for their swap.

The N351 ECU should at least send an impulse to both the front and rear rotor injectors. But in the case that you get it running with the N351 (NA) ecu don't hardly boost the car because the map is too lean and is designed for the NA engine, not the turbo engine. Meaning start looking for a N370 ECU.

So he used a standard light bulb for checking injector impulse and he said too bright? Like Hailers said "You're kidding right?"

The tool I use for checking injector impulse is made by snapon and it doesn't even plug into anything. it has a long thin rod that is set ontop of the injector on the car pluged in and it senses the injectors pulses and flashes and beeps to the pulses.

Have you tested the injectors? If you're wondering how to do that you can A: grab a drink and a snack and study the service manual and go through its fuel section, Or B: take a battery like a 9v and then take a leads to both prongs in the injector and one lead to positve on the battery and the other to the negative. When you connect the wire you will hear the injector click indicating the valve is opperative and presumably a good injector. The injector could be dirty though and that would flood sooner.

Its not easy to mix up the injector connectors on the harness. either secondary or primary connectors, you'd have to do some work to mix them up. You could in theory mix front and rear connectors up but that wouldn't do anything to keep it from starting or even firing.

So from what I've gained from your input you're getting spark across the board. One easy mistake is actually mixing the the trailing front and rear spark plug wires, although the car will run with them mixed up just rough though. but it can make a flooded car even harder to start.

So with an interesting main pulley it beggs the question of, what mark are you setting the CAS to? There's a good chance your timing isn't even near close. You can try the NA pulley and then set the cas to its marks.

Pics would help a little to imagining what you got going on.
what?
Old 01-13-09, 08:52 PM
  #32  
The Ceaseless Discharge

Thread Starter
 
linchpin360's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Metairie, LA
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Chris Boots
There's really no way the main pulley could be on wrong and I kinda doubt the keyway sheared off cause that would take a lot of force not even put on the pulley in the first place. Never have I seen a sheared key way and a pulley with opposite timing marks. The timing marks are about 10mm's from each other, not opposite of each other. You can put your NA pulley on it if you want just make sure you torque it to the correct spec or you can over crush the copper washer behind the main bolt and then that develops a nasty oil slinging leak.

You NA harness shouldn't be the problem. we've been doing S5 turbo swaps forever with not really any problem. Rotaryreserection can qoute me on that.

The N374 ECU are always problematic on our US or Canada car. The common problem with using a N374 is they don't send and impulse to the rear rotor injector. The only proven fix for the N374 ECU is to chip it. I personally have taken a N374 ECU and chipped it with a knightsport chip for my customer's cars when they decide they don't wanna go standalone or find a N370 for their swap.

The N351 ECU should at least send an impulse to both the front and rear rotor injectors. But in the case that you get it running with the N351 (NA) ecu don't hardly boost the car because the map is too lean and is designed for the NA engine, not the turbo engine. Meaning start looking for a N370 ECU.

So he used a standard light bulb for checking injector impulse and he said too bright? Like Hailers said "You're kidding right?"

The tool I use for checking injector impulse is made by snapon and it doesn't even plug into anything. it has a long thin rod that is set ontop of the injector on the car pluged in and it senses the injectors pulses and flashes and beeps to the pulses.

Have you tested the injectors? If you're wondering how to do that you can A: grab a drink and a snack and study the service manual and go through its fuel section, Or B: take a battery like a 9v and then take a leads to both prongs in the injector and one lead to positve on the battery and the other to the negative. When you connect the wire you will hear the injector click indicating the valve is opperative and presumably a good injector. The injector could be dirty though and that would flood sooner.

Its not easy to mix up the injector connectors on the harness. either secondary or primary connectors, you'd have to do some work to mix them up. You could in theory mix front and rear connectors up but that wouldn't do anything to keep it from starting or even firing.

So from what I've gained from your input you're getting spark across the board. One easy mistake is actually mixing the the trailing front and rear spark plug wires, although the car will run with them mixed up just rough though. but it can make a flooded car even harder to start.

So with an interesting main pulley it beggs the question of, what mark are you setting the CAS to? There's a good chance your timing isn't even near close. You can try the NA pulley and then set the cas to its marks.

Pics would help a little to imagining what you got going on.
Pics will be coming soon. I'll be home from school on Friday. The marks that are painted on the pulley are about 10mm apart. When I didn't notice the marks and was lining it up with the stock notches, I was setting it to the yellow mark. (the first mark you get to by turning it clockwise.) In other words the correct mark. As far as key-way and whatnot, I cannot confirm my theory yet. BUUUUTTT the key-way on the crank pulley of my mom's Legacy has been sheared off. Point being it's not impossible for it to happen, just highly (very highly) unlikely. My vote goes for it being missing altogether. It just sounds out of time in my opinion. On the fuel note, I thought that I had fuel on both rotors, but it doesn't seem to be flooding back there. At least not as badly as on the front. The plugs are wet, but not soaked like the front. Any more input?? C'mon guys, PROVE ME WRONG!!!! Lets get this damned thing started! It has the makings of a running car, it just needs some help! Again, Thank you to everyone who has been putting in their input. I really do appreciate everyone trying to help.


Note: I am going to be swaping the pulley on friday just so I can make sure. Does anyone know the torque spec on the pulley?

Steve.
Old 01-13-09, 10:29 PM
  #33  
I blame the TPS

 
Chris Boots's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: MT
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Tightening torque for the main pulley is:
108-132 NM ; 11.0-13.5 m-kg ; 80-98 ft-lb



Originally Posted by Delicious
what?
Good Answer
Old 01-13-09, 11:01 PM
  #34  
The Ceaseless Discharge

Thread Starter
 
linchpin360's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Metairie, LA
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Chris Boots
The Tightening torque for the main pulley is:
108-132 NM ; 11.0-13.5 m-kg ; 80-98 ft-lb




Good Answer

Thank you very much. I will report back with my findings and with pics Friday evening sometime.
Old 01-13-09, 11:18 PM
  #35  
NASA-MW ST4

iTrader: (7)
 
farberio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Norcal, Bay Area
Posts: 3,800
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by linchpin360
My vote goes for it being missing altogether. It just sounds out of time in my opinion.
If there was no keyway...what would force the pulley to spin around? Its not like its a press fit...

Same thing with the front counterweight, same thing with the CAS timing thing (technical term...forgot what its really called)

Originally Posted by linchpin360
On the fuel note, I thought that I had fuel on both rotors, but it doesn't seem to be flooding back there. At least not as badly as on the front. The plugs are wet, but not soaked like the front. Any more input??
You are cleaning the plugs when you put them back in...and making sure the car is completely devoid of fuel? Have you tried putting some oil in the trailing plug holes and starting? Did you verify that your ignition wires are on correctly?

Get a real compression test done.
Old 01-13-09, 11:20 PM
  #36  
NASA-MW ST4

iTrader: (7)
 
farberio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Norcal, Bay Area
Posts: 3,800
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Chris Boots
The Tightening torque for the main pulley is:
108-132 NM ; 11.0-13.5 m-kg ; 80-98 ft-lb




Good Answer
Also be very careful, my buddy changed his pulley when it was in the car and his front stack slid forward a bit and he pinched a needle bearing when he tightened it back up because it slid out of place.
Old 01-14-09, 07:05 AM
  #37  
The Ceaseless Discharge

Thread Starter
 
linchpin360's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Metairie, LA
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by farberio
If there was no keyway...what would force the pulley to spin around? Its not like its a press fit...

Same thing with the front counterweight, same thing with the CAS timing thing (technical term...forgot what its really called)



You are cleaning the plugs when you put them back in...and making sure the car is completely devoid of fuel? Have you tried putting some oil in the trailing plug holes and starting? Did you verify that your ignition wires are on correctly?

Get a real compression test done.
When tightening the bolt it COULD spin. Like I said before, not impossible, just unlikely. The plugs are clean. I've taken the leading plugs out and spun the motor backwards to get all of the gas out. Gas only comes out of the leading 1 hole. I have put oil in then tried to crank it, nothing. My wires are definitely on correctly.
Old 01-14-09, 12:46 PM
  #38  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Delicious's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Manteca, CA
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by linchpin360
Thank you very much. I will report back with my findings and with pics Friday evening sometime.
he was talking about me n00b
Old 01-14-09, 01:15 PM
  #39  
The Ceaseless Discharge

Thread Starter
 
linchpin360's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Metairie, LA
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Delicious
he was talking about me n00b
Well I guess it's a good thing I was thanking him for the correct torque specs of the e-shaft pulley bolt then isn't it? lol.
Old 01-14-09, 01:28 PM
  #40  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Delicious's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Manteca, CA
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Old 01-14-09, 02:42 PM
  #41  
The Ceaseless Discharge

Thread Starter
 
linchpin360's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Metairie, LA
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hahahaha.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trickster
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
25
07-01-23 04:40 PM
Azevedo
Other Engine Conversions - non V-8
26
03-01-19 09:19 PM
The Shaolin
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
9
09-14-15 07:50 PM
Machupicchu
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
8
08-17-15 08:27 PM



Quick Reply: t2 swap= no start!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:00 PM.