2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

Supercharging questions search didnt answer

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-23-05, 07:24 AM
  #26  
Junior Member

 
Rx4 whore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
how can you estimate the speed ratio (crank:SC pulley) for a wanted boost value, created with a supercharger?

say you have a 13B, with a positive disp 1200cc/rev supercharger.
Old 07-23-05, 08:39 AM
  #27  
AutoX Donut Maker

 
DemonicPupil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Annville, PA
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I had looked into doing this without moving the throttle body. What you can do is get a large vacuum activated valve. There are a bunch out there, not very expensive either. When there's vacuum, it's shut. When there's little vacuum it springs open. Put this before the supercharger.

Between your SC and your TB you put a bypass valve that is open during vacuum. This will give your engine air when cruising/idleing. this way cruising down the highway at 65... you can keep your SC in a vacuum state and get good gas mileage.
This is nice in that it keeps you from having to move your throttle linkage and etc. around.

Personally, I think the m90 is a good cheap starter for a boost application. Use it to learn the ins and outs of boosting your engine, then move on to bigger and better things. I don't why these threads turn into wars. It's quite simple, people are doing something, they want to do it cheap, and they want to learn how to do it so that when they go bigger, they know more. Better to learn cheap than to learn expensive and blow your **** up.
Old 07-23-05, 11:46 AM
  #28  
Super Raterhater

iTrader: (6)
 
SonicRaT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NY, MA, MI, OR, TX, and now LA or AZ!
Posts: 10,624
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
The m90 SUCKS. It blows more hot-air than it's worth to make anything even resembling power on an FC. And doing it cheap is exactly that, cheap. And generally, learning cheap leads to being more expensive than doing it right the first time.
Old 07-23-05, 11:47 AM
  #29  
Super Raterhater

iTrader: (6)
 
SonicRaT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NY, MA, MI, OR, TX, and now LA or AZ!
Posts: 10,624
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
And wtf is with these damn posts from forever being bumped?
Old 07-23-05, 12:06 PM
  #30  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary

iTrader: (19)
 
Natey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 4,455
Received 1,437 Likes on 743 Posts
Here's a twin blown Miata.


More: (56K, go make a sammitch.) http://brpforum.infopop.cc/eve/ubb.x...ColdFusion.wmv


Another pissed off Miata, just because.

Chech out the little details like the dual K&Ns in the cowl.
22psi = 340+ whp!
More: http://biggulp.home.att.net/Aboutbig...Gulp%208/29/04
Old 07-23-05, 08:17 PM
  #31  
Junior Member

 
Rx4 whore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
how can you estimate the speed ratio (crank:SC pulley) for a wanted boost value, created with a supercharger?

say you have a 13B, with a positive disp 1200cc/rev supercharger, and want to boost max 6-7 psi
Old 07-25-05, 08:27 PM
  #32  
Junior Member

 
Rx4 whore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
bump

anyone?
Old 07-25-05, 09:23 PM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
edmcguirk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Wayne, NJ 07470
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"rotary engine displacement ??"
https://www.rx7club.com/showthread.p...81#post4324081

Rotary breathes like a 2.6L 4 stroke engine or 1.3L/rev.

1.3L * (psi +14.7)/14.7 = 1.2L * crank ratio

1.5 times crank speed for 6psi.
1.6 times crank speed for 7psi.
Old 07-25-05, 09:51 PM
  #34  
Senior Member

 
86gxl_fc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: dallas, TX 75228
Posts: 605
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by vintagespeed
Most worried about turbo "lag" use nitrous on the bottom end to get the turbo spooled quicker or you can run staggered turbos using a smaller turbo to spool quickly and a larger turbo to come on at a higher RPM.
how would this be set up? is it like the sequential turbos the FD has?
that'd be nice to minimize turbo lag.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
wickedrx2
The Bad & Fugly Members
10
06-10-21 06:28 PM
MazdaspeedR1
The Bad & Fugly Businesses
27
05-22-18 05:58 PM
rotor_veux
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
5
09-03-15 07:10 PM



Quick Reply: Supercharging questions search didnt answer



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:55 PM.