2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

strange alignment Issues, camber plates and still no camber!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-12-09, 11:53 AM
  #1  
Boosted 7

Thread Starter
 
Matty's first 1st Gen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Mississauga, Ontario
Posts: 824
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
strange alignment Issues, camber plates and still no camber!

Hey guys, just got back from the alignment shop, and encountered some wierd results.

Background on car, its an 86 with 5 lug conversion silling on tien HR coilovers, with camber plates up from, rims and tires on the front are stock, and the rear has 18's with 245/45/18 tires.

the car is not lowered dramatically, i have about 2 inch fender gap all around. the guy at the shop calls me and asks me to come take a look at his machine. i asked him to do 1/16 toe in on the front with -2 degrees camber.

He said that he could only get -.02 degrees on the pass side, and -1 degree on the drivers side. with the camber plates being maxed out.

What would cause this, i know the frame on the drivers side is a little messed up, but i feel like that wouldn't explain the camber issue.

The backs both had -1.45 degrees camber

any chance the camber plates were designed to work wit the car lowered further? doesn't make much sense!
Old 08-12-09, 12:54 PM
  #2  
Rotary Freak

iTrader: (1)
 
rx7racerca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Lake Country, BC, Canada
Posts: 1,725
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
Lowering the car won't give you significant camber gain at the front - my car's lowered ~1 to 1.25", and I didn't gain any measurable static camber - I ended up using a pair of camber/crash bolts to get -.5. This is pretty typical of strut-type front suspensions - keep in mind the upper mount is close to being vertically located over the lower ball joint, so lowering the car doesn't affect the camber geometry much. I am a bit surprised you have to max out the adjustment with the camber plates to get such small, and mis-matched numbers. Could it be the camber plates are poorly installed? Regardless, frame damage can definitely make it hard, or impossible to get proper alignment.

Having a lot of static negative camber isn't always necessary. I have a lot of caster (maxed out), so I get a lot of camber gain under cornering - enough so, my front tires wear very evenly in auto-crossing and track days - with the added benefit that straight-line braking and tire wear on the inside edge isn't hurt by high negative camber.
Old 08-12-09, 01:00 PM
  #3  
Moderator

iTrader: (3)
 
j9fd3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,841
Received 2,604 Likes on 1,847 Posts
are the camber plates installed right? if they are backwards, or swapped right/left you don't get your full normal range of adjustment.
Old 08-12-09, 01:06 PM
  #4  
Boosted 7

Thread Starter
 
Matty's first 1st Gen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Mississauga, Ontario
Posts: 824
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I will have to take a good look at them, they came with the car
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
yetter227
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
20
09-05-15 11:57 PM
rotor_veux
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
5
09-03-15 07:10 PM



Quick Reply: strange alignment Issues, camber plates and still no camber!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:16 PM.