Stock intercooler questions?
#1
infini guru
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 1,183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Stock intercooler questions?
How much bhp can be made with the stock intercooler(not necessarily the stock turbo)?
How much(if any) is turbo lag increased by going FMIC?
Steve
How much(if any) is turbo lag increased by going FMIC?
Steve
#4
RX-7 Bad Ass
iTrader: (55)
I don't recommend past 10psi on the stock intercooler, and past 12psi on the stock turbo. The stock intercooler is REALLY bad - it's designed to work OK at stock boost, and that's it.
You'll actually gain better response and more boost going to a front-mount - again, that stock IC is a big restriction. I was pleasantly surprised at the throttle response that I picked up going to a front-mount!
Dale
You'll actually gain better response and more boost going to a front-mount - again, that stock IC is a big restriction. I was pleasantly surprised at the throttle response that I picked up going to a front-mount!
Dale
#7
RX-7 Bad Ass
iTrader: (55)
Uh, what pics?
Dale
Dale
Trending Topics
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Woodland Hills, CA
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Stock intercooler questions?
Originally posted by MtnRacer
How much bhp can be made with the stock intercooler(not necessarily the stock turbo)?
How much(if any) is turbo lag increased by going FMIC?
Steve
How much bhp can be made with the stock intercooler(not necessarily the stock turbo)?
How much(if any) is turbo lag increased by going FMIC?
Steve
I'll try to give you a more technical answer.
The stock intercooler is actually a great design, but in a bad place. You can make as much bHp as you can with any intercooler provided that the car doesn't see too much heat. The problem with the stock intercooler is that it is placed on top of the engine and then the scoop isn't well designed so that fresh air is going straight to it. Instead, the air it recieves becomes turbulent after a certain speed and the heat from the engine will rise interferring with that fresh air. The good side to the stock intercooler is that it will provide better spool-up and more boost pressure due to the inherent nature that its very close to the throttle body and doesn't have to travel far. By contrast, a front-mount intercooler is way downstream of the throttlebody and the moment you mount it, your boost pressure will drop. It will also drop because of the cooler air. You compensate for this by turning the boost pressure back up to the original setting. This increases power plus provides a cooler intake charge.
Turbo lag is not dependent on the placement, or size of the intercooler and has more to do with the size of your turbo and how fast your computer can inject fuel from the time you press on the gas to the time you get instant response (not full spool up).
Understand?
-M
#9
infini guru
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 1,183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks guys. Throttle response is very important to me, so if I went front mount, boost lag would either have to be at least the same or better than the stock mount. So nobody knows how much bhp can be safely made on the tmic? Sounds like it's under 300. =T
Steven
Steven
#11
Back from teh deadly!
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Louisville KY 40299
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by dcfc3s
Uh, what pics?
Dale
Uh, what pics?
Dale
Dont you know!? All that matters on this board anymore are the pics! Because I know I sure wouldnt want to add something to my car that would help is tremendously if it looked like crap! </sarcasm>
#12
Rotary Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: orlando ,fl
Posts: 790
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dont you know!? All that matters on this board anymore are the pics! Because I know I sure wouldnt want to add something to my car that would help is tremendously if it looked like crap! </sarcasm> .......................f off sucka
i just wanted to know if you had pics of the intercooler install dcfc3s ! i have a intercooler without the piping and just wanted the pics as a refrence until adamlewis that doesnt know me starts writing crap !
hey adam
i just wanted to know if you had pics of the intercooler install dcfc3s ! i have a intercooler without the piping and just wanted the pics as a refrence until adamlewis that doesnt know me starts writing crap !
hey adam
#13
Back from teh deadly!
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Louisville KY 40299
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by vmb
Dont you know!? All that matters on this board anymore are the pics! Because I know I sure wouldnt want to add something to my car that would help is tremendously if it looked like crap! </sarcasm> .......................f off sucka
i just wanted to know if you had pics of the intercooler install dcfc3s ! i have a intercooler without the piping and just wanted the pics as a refrence until adamlewis that doesnt know me starts writing crap !
hey adam
Dont you know!? All that matters on this board anymore are the pics! Because I know I sure wouldnt want to add something to my car that would help is tremendously if it looked like crap! </sarcasm> .......................f off sucka
i just wanted to know if you had pics of the intercooler install dcfc3s ! i have a intercooler without the piping and just wanted the pics as a refrence until adamlewis that doesnt know me starts writing crap !
hey adam
Oh wow...so mature. Really makes me want to help you in the future...
If you already have an IC, chances are someone here has installed it. Why dont you try doing a search?
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Woodland Hills, CA
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by MtnRacer
Thanks guys. Throttle response is very important to me, so if I went front mount, boost lag would either have to be at least the same or better than the stock mount. So nobody knows how much bhp can be safely made on the tmic? Sounds like it's under 300. =T
Steven
Thanks guys. Throttle response is very important to me, so if I went front mount, boost lag would either have to be at least the same or better than the stock mount. So nobody knows how much bhp can be safely made on the tmic? Sounds like it's under 300. =T
Steven
Also, I wouldn't bet on that 300HP figure. I'm pulling over that to the crank. It depends on the turbo you are using, its efficiency range, boost pressure, and temperature of the outside air.
-M
Last edited by TBoost; 09-24-02 at 07:39 PM.
#15
I wish I was driving!
Originally posted by TBoost
Did you hear what I said? Boost lag will be the same no matter what intercooler you put on.
Did you hear what I said? Boost lag will be the same no matter what intercooler you put on.
How about the fact that moving with moving the intercooler piping, the turbo must first fill the piping and larger IC area before building boost?
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Woodland Hills, CA
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by scathcart
uh HUH...
How about the fact that moving with moving the intercooler piping, the turbo must first fill the piping and larger IC area before building boost?
uh HUH...
How about the fact that moving with moving the intercooler piping, the turbo must first fill the piping and larger IC area before building boost?
Turbo lag is not how fast the turbo reaches full boost. Read the books... That is called "boost response". Turbo lag is really "fuel lag"..
-M
Last edited by TBoost; 09-24-02 at 08:01 PM.
#17
Pew Pew Pew
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: sunshine coast Australia
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i run 8psi stock that i use all the time only when i race i use 14psi and yes it does heat soak very quick when ive got my handset plugged it you can see the intake temp rise when you put your foot down on 8psi i have 190rwhp with a fmic i should get alot more power
#18
What R U thinking self?
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 2,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by madaz07
i run 8psi stock that i use all the time only when i race i use 14psi and yes it does heat soak very quick when ive got my handset plugged it you can see the intake temp rise when you put your foot down on 8psi i have 190rwhp with a fmic i should get alot more power
i run 8psi stock that i use all the time only when i race i use 14psi and yes it does heat soak very quick when ive got my handset plugged it you can see the intake temp rise when you put your foot down on 8psi i have 190rwhp with a fmic i should get alot more power
There is prolly some people on here getting ~190HP out of a N/A.
Last edited by Rpeck; 09-26-02 at 06:36 AM.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Woodland Hills, CA
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by madaz07
i run 8psi stock that i use all the time only when i race i use 14psi and yes it does heat soak very quick when ive got my handset plugged it you can see the intake temp rise when you put your foot down on 8psi i have 190rwhp with a fmic i should get alot more power
i run 8psi stock that i use all the time only when i race i use 14psi and yes it does heat soak very quick when ive got my handset plugged it you can see the intake temp rise when you put your foot down on 8psi i have 190rwhp with a fmic i should get alot more power
Granted your turbo is just a minor upgrade and is nowhere near as efficient as a bigger turbo at higher boost pressure so your intake temp will soar up there. But you should normally get at least a 40HP increase from 190RWHP @8psi to 14psi. To be honest, 210RWHP isn't all that bad. I think you are losing about 20-30HP somewhere that I wouldn't necessarily blame it on the stock intercooler.
-M
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Woodland Hills, CA
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Rpeck
I think there is somthing wrong with your car. The Mods you list above ... and your only getting 8 HP over a stock setup? The street ported motor alone should far exceed 8 HP in gains alone... not to mention the other goodies you listed. Um, whats wrong?
There is prolly some people on here getting ~190HP out of a N/A.
I think there is somthing wrong with your car. The Mods you list above ... and your only getting 8 HP over a stock setup? The street ported motor alone should far exceed 8 HP in gains alone... not to mention the other goodies you listed. Um, whats wrong?
There is prolly some people on here getting ~190HP out of a N/A.
Your sig number for CFM on your turbo is bogus. What psi is this upgrade being run at to get 900 CFM?
I'm anxious to see what your 10th does on the dyno.
-M
#21
What R U thinking self?
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 2,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by TBoost
Rspeck,
Your sig number for CFM on your turbo is bogus. What psi is this upgrade being run at to get 900 CFM?
I'm anxious to see what your 10th does on the dyno.
-M
Rspeck,
Your sig number for CFM on your turbo is bogus. What psi is this upgrade being run at to get 900 CFM?
I'm anxious to see what your 10th does on the dyno.
-M
#24
I wish I was driving!
Originally posted by TBoost
Once the intercooler is attached, the system is sealed and air has already become a continuous stream at idle. If it weren't the case, then the boost gauge (which is installed at the intake manifold) would be behind and you really wouldn't know what your boost pressue is.
Turbo lag is not how fast the turbo reaches full boost. Read the books... That is called "boost response". Turbo lag is really "fuel lag"..
-M
Once the intercooler is attached, the system is sealed and air has already become a continuous stream at idle. If it weren't the case, then the boost gauge (which is installed at the intake manifold) would be behind and you really wouldn't know what your boost pressue is.
Turbo lag is not how fast the turbo reaches full boost. Read the books... That is called "boost response". Turbo lag is really "fuel lag"..
-M
The turbo has to move more air to fill the larger volume, thus, typically, you get boost lag.
#25
Super Newbie
Originally posted by Rpeck
I think there is somthing wrong with your car. The Mods you list above ... and your only getting 8 HP over a stock setup? The street ported motor alone should far exceed 8 HP in gains alone... not to mention the other goodies you listed. Um, whats wrong?
There is prolly some people on here getting ~190HP out of a N/A.
I think there is somthing wrong with your car. The Mods you list above ... and your only getting 8 HP over a stock setup? The street ported motor alone should far exceed 8 HP in gains alone... not to mention the other goodies you listed. Um, whats wrong?
There is prolly some people on here getting ~190HP out of a N/A.