2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

A simple question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 12, 2010 | 03:35 PM
  #1  
Dunnhopen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From: Saint Louis, MO
A simple question

I was wondering what would make the front sit so much lower then the back for suspension. When I say this I mean specifically the space between the wheel and the wheel well.

I don't think this is normal, but could my front and back springs/shocks be switched accidentally or something? The front springs get narrow further down(more like a cone). I am just making sure nothing was done wrong by the previous owner here and needs to be corrected.

couple pictures for reference
http://www.ravagingsouls.com/images/RX7.jpg
http://www.ravagingsouls.com/images/RX7BIG.jpg
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2010 | 03:54 PM
  #2  
farberio's Avatar
NASA-MW ST4
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,800
Likes: 3
From: Norcal, Bay Area
Maybe strut top lowering from mazdatrix?

Doesn't look that outta place to me though.
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2010 | 05:28 PM
  #3  
rx7racerca's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,725
Likes: 8
From: Lake Country, BC, Canada
Broken/sagging springs or lowering springs at the front, perhaps? Because the rear openings are actually smaller, as on most cars, since the wheel doesn't need to clear the fender for steering. Alternately, maybe it has the wrong springs on the rear (although that would be difficult, the rears are a particularly tall spring, hard to mix and match with another car). In any case, it should not sit lower at the front, unless someone was trying to recreate the look of 60's and 70's muscle cars set up for drags. Which would be gay.

Afterthought: maybe you should look under the back and see if it still has the independent trailing arm suspension. Maybe a previous owner stuck a Ford 9" rear under there for drags.
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2010 | 07:21 PM
  #4  
PnoyRx7's Avatar
Super-Pinoy
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Liked
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,747
Likes: 20
From: Hamilton, Ontario
Originally Posted by rx7racerca
Broken/sagging springs or lowering springs at the front, perhaps? Because the rear openings are actually smaller, as on most cars, since the wheel doesn't need to clear the fender for steering. Alternately, maybe it has the wrong springs on the rear (although that would be difficult, the rears are a particularly tall spring, hard to mix and match with another car). In any case, it should not sit lower at the front, unless someone was trying to recreate the look of 60's and 70's muscle cars set up for drags. Which would be gay.

Afterthought: maybe you should look under the back and see if it still has the independent trailing arm suspension. Maybe a previous owner stuck a Ford 9" rear under there for drags.
you wouldnt believe what someone did to my 7 , when i bought it and brought it home i lifted it up and noticed someone had put civic springs on the front which made it feel like ****
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2010 | 07:36 PM
  #5  
89fc3sgtu's Avatar
boosted fc
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
From: texas
if you have s-teck sprngs and tockico stuts thats how it going to sit, i have them when i got my first fc and thats how it looks but wasnt tiff enough so i ot megan track colovers stiff as hell and fully adjustable so you can set it exactly how you want it
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2010 | 08:39 AM
  #6  
Dunnhopen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From: Saint Louis, MO
Originally Posted by 89fc3sgtu
if you have s-teck sprngs and tockico stuts thats how it going to sit, i have them when i got my first fc and thats how it looks but wasnt tiff enough so i ot megan track colovers stiff as hell and fully adjustable so you can set it exactly how you want it
That is what they are, and honestly I don't care for the look. I prefer a balanced look. I wonder if anyone would want to trade theirs. I know mine are fairly new.

The last guy was honest and right about everything he put on the car and he only had it for a year. Any idea what they would go for used so I would know what to expect? I wouldn't mind paying extra to have some adjustable coil-overs.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2010 | 09:30 AM
  #7  
Dunnhopen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From: Saint Louis, MO
Or is there a way to raise the front the 1.5 inches?
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2010 | 06:28 PM
  #8  
89fc3sgtu's Avatar
boosted fc
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
From: texas
if you want to be cheap and ghetto you can cut you rer springs but it want be even and it will kill your spring rate

but suspension wise coilovers are worth it, if you get a decent brand
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2010 | 06:41 PM
  #9  
Evil Aviator's Avatar
Rotorhead
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 39
From: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Originally Posted by Dunnhopen
couple pictures for reference
It could be partly due to the inclination of the driveway. What does the car look like parked the other direction?
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2010 | 08:03 PM
  #10  
Turbonut's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,993
Likes: 68
From: NJ
When new, the front is lower than the back.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
_Tones_
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
10
May 25, 2021 05:37 AM
ZacMan
Build Threads
4
Sep 19, 2015 09:20 PM
Nosferatu
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
7
Sep 5, 2015 02:13 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:50 AM.