2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Should I Do the TB Mod??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 20, 2004 | 07:35 AM
  #26  
wozzoom's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 903
Likes: 1
From: Conyngham, PA
Originally Posted by gsracer
n/a - no
turbo - yes


- Matt

Agreed! The throttle body mod on an NA makes the engine very jumpy. Transitions between accelerating and coasting are very jerky, enough to make your neck sore after some brief city driving.
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2004 | 08:42 AM
  #27  
cwsttu's Avatar
1.3L is not that small
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,470
Likes: 1
From: Nacogdoches Tx
Originally Posted by wozzoom
Agreed! The throttle body mod on an NA makes the engine very jumpy. Transitions between accelerating and coasting are very jerky, enough to make your neck sore after some brief city driving.
!?!?!?! what are you talking about... maybe your foot is coming off of the pedal way to fast or your dashpot is not working right.... mine is not jumpy at and i have modified my dashpot so i dont have a slow return to idle... could you explain more about why this is because i do not have any jumpiness or jerky transitions.. maybe im lucky but i havent heard of that before
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2004 | 09:14 AM
  #28  
Syonyk's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,718
Likes: 1
From: Ames, IA
Well, I have a NA, and haven't ported the throttle body yet, but I wired the aux plates open. I haven't noticed any real problems down low (well, other than my TPS needing more adjustment, it was WAY off, and is now close, but not quite right). It feels like there's *slightly* less low end torque, but the high end is a lot nicer.

I'm planning to port my throttle body whenever I get time & a few weeks I can be without my car (it's on the list to do when I remove the intake manifolds and clean/port stuff).

-=Russ=-
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2004 | 09:28 AM
  #29  
cwsttu's Avatar
1.3L is not that small
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,470
Likes: 1
From: Nacogdoches Tx
if you gained top end after wiring the aux ports open then your ports were not working correctly in the first place.... there should be no top end gain, only low end loss and believe me i tried it because i wanted to exp it first hand... no better top end and a shitload of torque loss... get your ports working correctly... are you able to turn them with your hand? if not then they are stuck or not opening all the way
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2004 | 09:59 AM
  #30  
wozzoom's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 903
Likes: 1
From: Conyngham, PA
Originally Posted by cwsttu
!?!?!?! what are you talking about... maybe your foot is coming off of the pedal way to fast or your dashpot is not working right.... mine is not jumpy at and i have modified my dashpot so i dont have a slow return to idle... could you explain more about why this is because i do not have any jumpiness or jerky transitions.. maybe im lucky but i havent heard of that before
No my foot is working fine and I've been driving this car since 1991..I think I would know the difference. I did the throttle body mod and the car is jerky when you transition between accellerate and coasting. Mainly in 1st gear.

Don't get me wrong, the throttle response is nice with the TBM but the added jerkyness is not worth it on an NA.

Also, there is about a ZERO gain doing this on an NA. I have a dyno sheet from last year and one from two weeks ago. The only difference being the TBM. The peak RWHP was about the same. IE: I can attribute the difference in HP to temperature...
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2004 | 10:06 AM
  #31  
cwsttu's Avatar
1.3L is not that small
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,470
Likes: 1
From: Nacogdoches Tx
lol well good to know your foot is in healthy working condition... i hope you dont think i ever said the TBM on an n/a will net hp gains.... if anything at all it might be slight more response... of course i did mine when i built my intake so any improvement i felt would generally come from the CAI not the TB mod, however im sure some better airflow is allowed throught the TB, and the jerkyness... now that you say 1st gear i understand what you are talking about, i have a slight bit of jerkyness in 1st but dont notice it in any other gear...
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2004 | 10:13 AM
  #32  
Syonyk's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,718
Likes: 1
From: Ames, IA
Originally Posted by cwsttu
if you gained top end after wiring the aux ports open then your ports were not working correctly in the first place.... there should be no top end gain, only low end loss and believe me i tried it because i wanted to exp it first hand... no better top end and a shitload of torque loss... get your ports working correctly... are you able to turn them with your hand? if not then they are stuck or not opening all the way
Sorry, that was really badly worded. Not the 6th ports - they're working properly. The secondary throttle bore aux butterflies (the ones that get removed in the TBM). I was having problems with power - sometimes the engine would have a lot of power, sometimes it was not making much at all. Wiring the aux butterflies open eliminated the problems I was having with erratic power output, and the engine felt better up at the top end.

-=Russ=-
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2004 | 04:50 PM
  #33  
ddub's Avatar
i am legendary
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,478
Likes: 1
From: Kirkland, WA
Originally Posted by wozzoom
No my foot is working fine and I've been driving this car since 1991..I think I would know the difference. I did the throttle body mod and the car is jerky when you transition between accellerate and coasting. Mainly in 1st gear.

Don't get me wrong, the throttle response is nice with the TBM but the added jerkyness is not worth it on an NA.

Also, there is about a ZERO gain doing this on an NA. I have a dyno sheet from last year and one from two weeks ago. The only difference being the TBM. The peak RWHP was about the same. IE: I can attribute the difference in HP to temperature...
Doing the TB mod makes it a lot easier to port, though. The plates are in the way otherwise. Plus for me the TB mod was another 2.6 lbs of weight reduction
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2004 | 05:48 PM
  #34  
cwsttu's Avatar
1.3L is not that small
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,470
Likes: 1
From: Nacogdoches Tx
haha its always called weight reduction if its not a performance mod.... im the same way i did it for the weight reduction
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2004 | 06:48 PM
  #35  
poor_red_neck's Avatar
Wait................What?
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh/Cary, NC - USA
Well... its something FREE to do, and I did personally notice better throttle response, and a little top end... but I also cleaned the K/N filter at the same time
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2004 | 08:23 PM
  #36  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Originally Posted by wozzoom
Don't get me wrong, the throttle response is nice with the TBM but the added jerkyness is not worth it on an NA.
The TB mod on an NA should not make any difference to throttle response unless you've done something wrong. The throttle response is improved only on Turbos because the upstream secondary plates are damped (i.e the open slower than the downstream ones). On NA's those plates are held fully open once the engine is warm. So the only difference is a set of open throttle plates are removed. How is that going to affect throttle response or cause jerkiness?
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2004 | 11:19 PM
  #37  
locketine's Avatar
Road Rotary Aviator
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
From: Oregon
hey I don't have this mod done and my car is jerky just as you guys describe. my tps is not perfect, but it is below 2500 and when I let off the pedal there's a neck snapping type jerk.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2004 | 12:10 AM
  #38  
Syonyk's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,718
Likes: 1
From: Ames, IA
Fix your TPS before you complain about ANYTHING involving a jerk on throttle movement.

-=Russ=-
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2004 | 12:59 AM
  #39  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
What he said.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2004 | 08:17 AM
  #40  
wozzoom's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 903
Likes: 1
From: Conyngham, PA
Originally Posted by NZConvertible
The TB mod on an NA should not make any difference to throttle response unless you've done something wrong. The throttle response is improved only on Turbos because the upstream secondary plates are damped (i.e the open slower than the downstream ones). On NA's those plates are held fully open once the engine is warm. So the only difference is a set of open throttle plates are removed. How is that going to affect throttle response or cause jerkiness?
I value your input.

Yes the plates are held fully open, but they are still in the path of the intake. Also when they are fully open, they don't sit perfectly parallel with the incomming air. they point about 5 Degrees up causing a disruption in the intake. Removing the plates did make a difference, but nothing to write home about. About the same as difference cleaning the air filter.

Maybe the effect of the TB mod on an NA is all mental who knows. I'm not recommending it to anyone with an NA. I took my ported TB off and replaced it with my original unmolested unit. The jerkyness I described is gone.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2004 | 12:17 PM
  #41  
Syonyk's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,718
Likes: 1
From: Ames, IA
Silly question... the people who are getting jerkiness with NAs and the TB mod, did you readjust your TPS after modding things?

-=Russ=-
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2004 | 01:21 PM
  #42  
cwsttu's Avatar
1.3L is not that small
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,470
Likes: 1
From: Nacogdoches Tx
yes more than likely we adjusted the tps... i know i did and if anybody knows anything about a rotary they would know to readjust this after doing this mod because the tps gets bumped around so much its bound to be off
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2004 | 06:50 AM
  #43  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Originally Posted by wozzoom
Yes the plates are held fully open, but they are still in the path of the intake. Also when they are fully open, they don't sit perfectly parallel with the incomming air. they point about 5 Degrees up causing a disruption in the intake.
This is a static situation, i.e. is doesn't change as you open and close the throttle, so it won't have any effect on drivability.

I'm not recommending it to anyone with an NA. I took my ported TB off and replaced it with my original unmolested unit. The jerkyness I described is gone.
Given the number of NA owners who've done this with no problems, and that the problem went away when you swapped TB's, I'd say it was far more likely to be a problem related to that specific TB, and the not the TB mod in general.

There are no reasons not to do it on an NA, just fewer benefits compared to a Turbo.

Last edited by NZConvertible; Aug 22, 2004 at 06:59 AM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
demetlaw
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
6
Oct 2, 2015 06:22 PM
musker
New Member RX-7 Technical
1
Oct 1, 2015 05:58 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:02 AM.