2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

saw an exploded 7 on the I-5 on sunday...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-28-04, 10:58 PM
  #26  
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Icemark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Rohnert Park CA
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 19 Posts
Originally posted by casio
being such a well-known safety hazard, why would this part not be classified as a recall?
i used to know the definition of recall, but alas have forgotten. was there at least a bulletin (is that what its called?) on these?
Nah, the part is designed to last 10 years or 100K miles. If it breaks after that, the NTSHA says that it is a maintenance item.

Now if there were a considerable amount of failures (probably more than 50-100 examples) under 100K miles and under 10 year, then there would probably have been an investigation and possibly a recall.
Old 06-29-04, 12:27 AM
  #27  
Senior Member

 
turboii87rx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
where is the PD? I have both of my intake manifolds off, so i'd like to replace it while im at it. i really cant afford to have my car burn to the ground. Pictures would be nice. Thanks
Old 06-29-04, 12:42 AM
  #28  
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Icemark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Rohnert Park CA
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 19 Posts
end of the primary fuel rail
Old 06-29-04, 03:41 AM
  #29  
Senior Member

 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: AZ/CA
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The PD is always an issue. And yes, if you have a J-Spec engine with only 30K miles on it you STILL need to replace the PD. Regardless of mileage, the engine AND PD are still 15+ years old.

The S5 rails still do fail, i've read many an article and thread on it. Maybe not as often, but i still wouldnt want to take that risk.

Is it allright if you get rid of the PD and put a banjo bolt there?
The PD is still a necessary part of the fuel system. Mazda put it there for a reason, thus it must serve a purpose. Just because a banjo bolt works, doesnt means it works PROPERLY. (i.e. slight pulses in your injectors, instead of a smooth fuel flow, can result in improper A/F mixture. Possibly leaning out slightly, under boost can result in that all to familiar "pop")

When everything in your car (especially the fuel system) is tuned up ever so exact, and the difference between a blown motor and better E/T's relys on your A/F mixture being just right... its just not a risk id like to take
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Daua118
SE RX-7 Forum
25
12-05-21 04:15 PM
Th0m4s
Build Threads
25
02-26-19 02:04 AM
NLPerformance
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
10
10-02-15 07:11 AM
Fikshun
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
5
09-28-02 01:32 AM
91REX
Interior / Exterior / Audio
4
05-04-02 01:10 AM



Quick Reply: saw an exploded 7 on the I-5 on sunday...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:44 PM.