2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

SAFC Tuning ?'s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-05-04, 08:16 PM
  #1  
T2 Noob.

Thread Starter
 
fc3seeker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: San Fran-Mateo
Posts: 1,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SAFC Tuning ?'s

Ok I went to the dyno meet today and managed to pull off 190 RWHP.

Here's my sheet:



I see that my AFR is around 11 after 4.5k RPMS. How much can I tune my SAFC to get a wee bit more power.

Thanks

Last edited by fc3seeker; 06-05-04 at 08:23 PM.
Old 06-05-04, 08:47 PM
  #2  
777** The Anti-rice

 
DEZERTE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 2,100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
you can tune to 12 i believe if you have an NA. Ive heard of some going as lean as 12.5ish, but I would stay at 12.
Old 06-05-04, 08:55 PM
  #3  
T2 Noob.

Thread Starter
 
fc3seeker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: San Fran-Mateo
Posts: 1,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
how much - % on the safc would raise the AF 1 point.
Old 06-05-04, 09:03 PM
  #4  
I'm a boost creep...

 
NZConvertible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Go back to the dyno and have it tuned properly. Don't guess.
Old 06-05-04, 09:34 PM
  #5  
777** The Anti-rice

 
DEZERTE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 2,100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by NZConvertible
Go back to the dyno and have it tuned properly. Don't guess.

was the first time he dyno'd it not propor?
can we get a bigger pic of the dyno? that one sucks.
If you need a host email it to me: Nicerx7@aol.com
Old 06-05-04, 09:35 PM
  #6  
777** The Anti-rice

 
DEZERTE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 2,100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
btw, do you have a t2 or an NA
Edit* and what mods?
Old 06-05-04, 09:52 PM
  #7  
Exhaust leak

 
version13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 701
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
He has an '87 t2, according to his profile. Each tuning job for every car will be different, so it is ultimately up to you and if you cannot tune it properly, have a professional do it.
Old 06-05-04, 11:04 PM
  #8  
T2 Noob.

Thread Starter
 
fc3seeker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: San Fran-Mateo
Posts: 1,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by DEZERTE
btw, do you have a t2 or an NA
Edit* and what mods?
Just emailed you a bigger pic of the dyno sheet.

The pic I uploaded to imagestation was huge but when I linked it here it got shrunk.

I have an 87 T2 Mods:

RB Turboback
Walbro
FCD, BOV (<- if you wanna call those mods)
Old 06-05-04, 11:07 PM
  #9  
SOLD THE RX-7!

 
Scott 89t2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 7,451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
what was your boost? 190 seems kinda low.

as for tunning. you do a dyno run. adjust a bit. dyno run, adjust abit, dyno run etc....

you can't just do it once.
Old 06-05-04, 11:07 PM
  #10  
I'm a boost creep...

 
NZConvertible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally posted by DEZERTE
was the first time he dyno'd it not propor?
I didn't say it wasn't, I said he should go back to the dyno and have the S-AFC tuned properly instead of asking us to guess what correction figures might give him the AFR he wants. That's a good way to lose an engine...

Last edited by NZConvertible; 06-05-04 at 11:09 PM.
Old 06-05-04, 11:10 PM
  #11  
T2 Noob.

Thread Starter
 
fc3seeker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: San Fran-Mateo
Posts: 1,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Scott 89t2
what was your boost? 190 seems kinda low.

as for tunning. you do a dyno run. adjust a bit. dyno run, adjust abit, dyno run etc....

you can't just do it once.
7.5psi on the stock s4 turbo.

Last edited by fc3seeker; 06-05-04 at 11:14 PM.
Old 06-05-04, 11:49 PM
  #12  
I R SAD PANDA W/O BAW

 
ilike2eatricers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: bay area
Posts: 6,061
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
If you uploaded the original large picture go to your imagestation and click on view original and it will show you the full size picture and you can load it here.
Old 06-06-04, 01:45 AM
  #13  
777** The Anti-rice

 
DEZERTE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 2,100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by NZConvertible
I didn't say it wasn't, I said he should go back to the dyno and have the S-AFC tuned properly instead of asking us to guess what correction figures might give him the AFR he wants. That's a good way to lose an engine...
Oh ok, thanks. I dont get how to tune the AFC quite yet either. like the +/-%, say you are running 11:1 at 3500rpms.. what would tuning it -50% give you for an AFR?

Anyways, here's his dynosheet:
Old 06-06-04, 01:53 AM
  #14  
Senior Member

 
jhillyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: San Ramon CA 94583
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The beast appears to be suffocated above 5krpm.
Old 06-06-04, 07:40 AM
  #15  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
White_FC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Darwin, NT, Australia
Posts: 1,228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by DEZERTE
Oh ok, thanks. I dont get how to tune the AFC quite yet either. like the +/-%, say you are running 11:1 at 3500rpms.. what would tuning it -50% give you for an AFR?
22:1, point being though that the engine would not be running at the same RPM because it wouldn't be able to make enough power to turn itself over. So the AFR would change again..
Really like NZConvertible said, you can't just guess and plug in numbers, some engines will respond slightly different to how much fuel you inject.

So don't try and tune a SAFC by doing one dyno run and trying to extrapolate AFR adjustment numbers from that to plug into your SAFC. Do it while your at the dyno.
Old 06-06-04, 05:02 PM
  #16  
I'm a boost creep...

 
NZConvertible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
What he said. Don't guess!
Old 06-06-04, 05:10 PM
  #17  
i am legendary

 
ddub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 8,478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by DEZERTE
you can tune to 12 i believe if you have an NA. Ive heard of some going as lean as 12.5ish, but I would stay at 12.

I've heard of people going to 13 no problem on n/a... 12 is alright, but you can go leaner and see greater gains

Last edited by ddub; 06-06-04 at 05:16 PM.
Old 06-06-04, 07:01 PM
  #18  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
fstrnyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Statesboro, GA
Posts: 1,233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by jhillyer
The beast appears to be suffocated above 5krpm.
that's the stock intake's fault. replace that intake with a 3" pipe and K&N and you'll soon realize how crappy the stock piece is. Through experience, on my car with only exhaust, my boost reaches 10psi at around 5k and falls to 7psi by redline. With my intake on, boost goes to 10psi till 4k then jumps to 17psi till redline. That was with unported S4 wastegate.
Old 06-07-04, 07:03 PM
  #19  
Full Member

 
osdesigns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Bay area
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is no suffocation above 5000 rpm. The
dyno chart appears to be perfectly normal.
Peak torque will be made at 5250rpm, and stock
intake or any intake kit wouldn't move that by
much.
Horsepower dropping after 6200 rpm indicating
this engine sports a stock porting or close to stock
port configuration. It seems that you can move
everything from 6000 rpm up half a point. That
might give you a little more power and move the
peak hp up a few hundred rpm. However, since
you have very limited control over your timing it is
not advisable to lean out too much more.
Old 06-09-04, 07:20 PM
  #20  
777** The Anti-rice

 
DEZERTE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 2,100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by White_FC
22:1, point being though that the engine would not be running at the same RPM because it wouldn't be able to make enough power to turn itself over. So the AFR would change again..
Really like NZConvertible said, you can't just guess and plug in numbers, some engines will respond slightly different to how much fuel you inject.

So don't try and tune a SAFC by doing one dyno run and trying to extrapolate AFR adjustment numbers from that to plug into your SAFC. Do it while your at the dyno.
I dont see why tuning -50% off of 11:1 would give you 22:1, seems like it woudl give you 16.5:1, while tuning -100% (which isnt possible) would give you 22:1... explain to me?
Old 06-09-04, 07:39 PM
  #21  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
White_FC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Darwin, NT, Australia
Posts: 1,228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by DEZERTE
I dont see why tuning -50% off of 11:1 would give you 22:1, seems like it woudl give you 16.5:1, while tuning -100% (which isnt possible) would give you 22:1... explain to me?
11:1 -> 11 : (1*0.5) -> 11:0.5 -> (11*2) : (0.5*2) -> 22:1

This is of course keeping in mind that the actual air flow stays constant...
Which of course it doesn't like I said above.

Maybe you could explain to me how you worked yours out? You might be right... I don't know much when it comes to things like this, i'm only a mere student
Old 06-09-04, 11:30 PM
  #22  
EIT

 
gsracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,790
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
An interesting correlation I've found on a few stock dynographs is the hump between 4k and 4.5k rpms. This is obviously after the secondaries are firing, so there should be plenty of fuel to support the incoming airflow. Has anyone else noticed this tiny lean hump on bolt-on fc's?
Old 06-10-04, 12:36 AM
  #23  
I'm a boost creep...

 
NZConvertible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally posted by DEZERTE
I dont see why tuning -50% off of 11:1 would give you 22:1, seems like it woudl give you 16.5:1, while tuning -100% (which isnt possible) would give you 22:1... explain to me?
-50% is half, so it you tell the ECU it's getting half the air is really is then it's inject half the amount of fuel. An AFR of 11:1 means 11 parts air to 1 part fuel (by mass), so if you half the amount of fuel you get 11 parts air to 0.5 parts fuel which is the the same as 22 parts air to 1 part fuel (22:1). Make sense?

FYI, if you set the S-AFC to +50%, an 11:1 AFR would in theory change to 7.3:1, but I doubt the engine would even run...
Old 06-10-04, 12:50 AM
  #24  
777** The Anti-rice

 
DEZERTE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 2,100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lol ok, thx jason
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Logan Reinisch
General Rotary Tech Support
44
09-17-18 12:20 PM
Andrew7dg
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
3
08-06-17 01:41 PM
demetlaw
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
6
10-02-15 06:22 PM
93FD510
New Member RX-7 Technical
2
10-01-15 02:00 PM



Quick Reply: SAFC Tuning ?'s



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:20 AM.