2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

S4 Turbocharger power vs. S5 Turbocharger

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 11, 2006 | 02:56 PM
  #1  
tjeter's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 980
Likes: 0
From: NOVA, Calvert county, Charlotte
S4 Turbocharger power vs. S5 Turbocharger

I've never really been into the S5 turbo's but were going to have to take the engine out next weekend, and the hybrid turbo i got a hold of turned out to be bad, so i want to throw a S5 Turbo on there, I'm curious as to what the REAL advantages are, besides the wastegate, (i.e.: What type of power they put out, also do they spool quicker than the S4 or hold power to the redline better, sorry if its a newb question i've searched through and can't really find the answers to my question. Also i know i am going to need a S5 manifold which i'm going to get a hold of soon.
Reply
Old May 11, 2006 | 07:55 PM
  #2  
88IntegraLS's Avatar
Displacement > Boost
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,503
Likes: 0
From: Mississippi
Given the "dual scroll" feature (or whatever it was called) that the S5 units had, some kind of changing exhaust gas vector toward the impeller with rpm changes in the engine, it would be a reasonable expectation for the S5 unit to spool quicker and / or at a lower rpm.

But turbo is turbo, take off ur cats on an S4 tII and you'll spool a lot quicker than either of them in stock form.

For a car that is already missing its cats, the difference would not be large enough to justify the changeover IMO. It would be more beneficial to drop a V8 in there anyways. Then you can have big power and an engine that will not pop on the first bad tank of $3.49 91 octane.
Reply
Old May 11, 2006 | 07:56 PM
  #3  
slpin's Avatar
7th Heaven
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,663
Likes: 4
From: California
why does everyone think... if its s5, it must be better?
Reply
Old May 11, 2006 | 08:03 PM
  #4  
cpubugs's Avatar
Lovin my 7
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 756
Likes: 0
From: Lakeland, FL
Because why would Mazda make the S5 less than the S4. lol Makes sense. Not to mention the HP difference between the S4 and S5 7's.
Reply
Old May 11, 2006 | 08:10 PM
  #5  
tjeter's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 980
Likes: 0
From: NOVA, Calvert county, Charlotte
I didn't say the S5 was a better car, i heard the S5 turbochargers were better, so i'm still wondering which will create more power..
Reply
Old May 11, 2006 | 08:14 PM
  #6  
87RX27's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: Holland, Michigan
Why would you want to put in a simple boring v8 anyway, especailly american made? Rotary power!!! Isnt that what RX's are all about? On the topic. I was told(by majestic turbo) that the S5 spools slower because of the larger hot side. But it has larger wastegate(s). And I thought it was the S4 that used the twin scroll design, isnt that what that extra actuator on the exhaust manifold is for?
Reply
Old May 11, 2006 | 08:36 PM
  #7  
88IntegraLS's Avatar
Displacement > Boost
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,503
Likes: 0
From: Mississippi
Ladies, ladies, let's try to think with our more elevated heads here, the S5 came with higher stock boost than the S4. That was the main difference in source of extra power with the series change.

Don't discriminate against Real American Cubic Inches..... there is plenty of room in the FC's chest for some real muscle. The frame is very strong, the heart is weak.
Reply
Old May 11, 2006 | 08:41 PM
  #8  
cpubugs's Avatar
Lovin my 7
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 756
Likes: 0
From: Lakeland, FL
Ok so you get coil overs, what makes them better then? I think they both have things that people want. But I think over all there were reasons Mazda's well versed engineers had a few reasons to make a new series. Generally this is done to make beneficial changes. But hey what do those crazy people at mazda know?

Last edited by cpubugs; May 11, 2006 at 08:43 PM.
Reply
Old May 11, 2006 | 09:12 PM
  #9  
RenofHeavens's Avatar
Famous Phil's Cheesteaks
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
From: Los Feliz/LA, CA
Infini IV FTW...S5 tehehe

Reply
Old May 11, 2006 | 09:25 PM
  #10  
tjeter's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 980
Likes: 0
From: NOVA, Calvert county, Charlotte
Yeah i really just want to know the advantages and differences and the max whp each will produce... please
Reply
Old May 11, 2006 | 10:01 PM
  #11  
SayNoToPistons's Avatar
Insane Burning Diarrhea
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,796
Likes: 0
From: Noo Yawk City / San Diego
Originally Posted by cpubugs
Ok so you get coil overs, what makes them better then? I think they both have things that people want. But I think over all there were reasons Mazda's well versed engineers had a few reasons to make a new series. Generally this is done to make beneficial changes. But hey what do those crazy people at mazda know?
you have MUCH to learn...
Reply
Old May 11, 2006 | 10:07 PM
  #12  
classicauto's Avatar
Crash Auto?Fix Auto.
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 7,831
Likes: 2
From: Hagersville Ontario
Originally Posted by tjeter
Yeah i really just want to know the advantages and differences and the max whp each will produce... please
One of the larger reasons for the power change between series on the turbo models is the motor internals. Lighter, higher compression rotors on the S5 are where most of the ground was made.

Other than the wastegate I haven't personally noticed much of a difference in performance - turbo wise - on these cars between series.



As far as which series is better, each obviously has its ups and downs but many of the changes made to the S5 model were to reduce costs, not necessairily make it a better car. I don't think they intentionally made it a worse performer either, its simply that some of things that were changed turned out overtime to be more lax on the S5, such as the pastic "dog bone" stabilizer links.
Reply
Old May 12, 2006 | 12:19 AM
  #13  
jacobcartmill's Avatar
just dont care.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 9,387
Likes: 4
From: Nashville, TN
the s5 car ran slightly more boost from the factory and had higher compression rotors.

the s5 turbo is better, it has a divided manifold, no twin scroll crap, the s5 AFM is better, the s5 ECU actually has a useful CEL.

Last edited by jacobcartmill; May 12, 2006 at 12:36 AM.
Reply
Old May 12, 2006 | 01:09 AM
  #14  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
The S5's fully divided manifold means the strong pulses generated in the exhaust ports travel all the way to the turbine wheel and hit the blades with greater force. In the S4's common manifold some of the effect of these pulses was lost. The result is quicker spooling and less lag. The dual wastegate wasn't really about more flow (the S4's small wastegate port works fine on a stock car), but about keeping the front and rear exhaust pulses completely separated.

The compressor housing, compressor wheel and CRHA are the same, so peak power won't be improved by swapping on the S5 turbo, but a more responsive turbo means engine will receive boost sooner when you put your foot down and hence the car will accelerate faster.

(Edit...Remove reference to deleted post)

Last edited by Aaron Cake; May 12, 2006 at 10:35 AM.
Reply
Old May 12, 2006 | 03:15 AM
  #15  
fstrnyou's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,233
Likes: 0
From: Statesboro, GA
hmm, i'm hitting stock 5.5psi by 2100. how much sooner do i need it?
Reply
Old May 12, 2006 | 03:25 AM
  #16  
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
Sharp Claws
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 50
From: Central Florida
most hybrids omit the twin scroll and port the runners larger than stock S5 runners anyways. there is no benefit to either turbo aside from possibly the wastegate, of which is modified much larger anyways.
Reply
Old May 12, 2006 | 04:00 AM
  #17  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Originally Posted by Karack
most hybrids omit the twin scroll and port the runners larger than stock S5 runners anyways.
Who compares stock to modified? If you can port the S4 runners then you can port the S5 runners. The S5 has greater width across the outside of the runners, so it can be ported wider than the S4.

there is no benefit to either turbo...
So are you saying that a divided manifold isn't a benefit?
Reply
Old May 12, 2006 | 05:08 AM
  #18  
jacobcartmill's Avatar
just dont care.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 9,387
Likes: 4
From: Nashville, TN
i totally agree with jason.

whats been the deal with people being totally dumbfounded with the turbos on their cars on here lately?
Reply
Old May 12, 2006 | 05:29 AM
  #19  
eriksseven's Avatar
Make Money.
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,137
Likes: 9
From: Seattle
Originally Posted by jacobcartmill
i totally agree with jason.

whats been the deal with people being totally dumbfounded with the turbos on their cars on here lately?
topics come in waves, lol...
Reply
Old May 12, 2006 | 10:03 AM
  #20  
Boost_Creep's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Originally Posted by 88IntegraLS
Given the "dual scroll" feature (or whatever it was called) that the S5 units had, some kind of changing exhaust gas vector toward the impeller with rpm changes in the engine, it would be a reasonable expectation for the S5 unit to spool quicker and / or at a lower rpm.
................
No one mentioned this yet, so I guess I will.

The dual-scroll feature was only featured on the S4 TurboII's and removed on the S5 Turbo. Just look at the bottom of the S5 Turbos and you will find no actuator for the twin scroll.
Reply
Old May 12, 2006 | 07:24 PM
  #21  
87RX27's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: Holland, Michigan
Forget a turbo just throw in a big heavy american v8. Its the only way us stupid americans can make power. Personally I would run the s5 because of the wastegate. Its safer(stock) to control the boost levels at anything above stock. I replaced my s4 unit with an s5 and it spools a little slower but not much.
Reply
Old May 12, 2006 | 09:21 PM
  #22  
swanton187's Avatar
Registered 7 User
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
From: Kitchener, Ont, Ca
Originally Posted by 87RX27
Forget a turbo just throw in a big heavy american v8. Its the only way us stupid americans can make power.

finally someone speaks the truth...

but I would say s5 because of the bigger wastegate that should be ported.
Reply
Old May 12, 2006 | 10:15 PM
  #23  
88rxn/a's Avatar
tom port.. AKA streetport
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,658
Likes: 0
From: ludlow, pa
Forget a turbo just throw in a big heavy american v8.
thats just crazy talk!! buy a muscle car if ya want a V8 !!!
lol...
Reply
Old May 12, 2006 | 11:51 PM
  #24  
bigj50's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: san leandro(SF BAY)
Forget a turbo just throw in a big heavy american v8.
most american V8's weigh about the same as a 13b..... especially with all the turbo crap.....


Its the only way us stupid americans can make power
spaeak for urself buddy....... i'm an american and i'm not stupid ... you sound like the only stupid person here . Try to be a lil more open minded
Reply
Old May 13, 2006 | 12:02 AM
  #25  
SayNoToPistons's Avatar
Insane Burning Diarrhea
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,796
Likes: 0
From: Noo Yawk City / San Diego
^ please just GTFO troll...
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:03 AM.