S4 Turbocharger power vs. S5 Turbocharger
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 980
Likes: 0
From: NOVA, Calvert county, Charlotte
S4 Turbocharger power vs. S5 Turbocharger
I've never really been into the S5 turbo's but were going to have to take the engine out next weekend, and the hybrid turbo i got a hold of turned out to be bad, so i want to throw a S5 Turbo on there, I'm curious as to what the REAL advantages are, besides the wastegate, (i.e.: What type of power they put out, also do they spool quicker than the S4 or hold power to the redline better, sorry if its a newb question i've searched through and can't really find the answers to my question. Also i know i am going to need a S5 manifold which i'm going to get a hold of soon.
Given the "dual scroll" feature (or whatever it was called) that the S5 units had, some kind of changing exhaust gas vector toward the impeller with rpm changes in the engine, it would be a reasonable expectation for the S5 unit to spool quicker and / or at a lower rpm.
But turbo is turbo, take off ur cats on an S4 tII and you'll spool a lot quicker than either of them in stock form.
For a car that is already missing its cats, the difference would not be large enough to justify the changeover IMO. It would be more beneficial to drop a V8 in there anyways. Then you can have big power and an engine that will not pop on the first bad tank of $3.49 91 octane.
But turbo is turbo, take off ur cats on an S4 tII and you'll spool a lot quicker than either of them in stock form.
For a car that is already missing its cats, the difference would not be large enough to justify the changeover IMO. It would be more beneficial to drop a V8 in there anyways. Then you can have big power and an engine that will not pop on the first bad tank of $3.49 91 octane.
Why would you want to put in a simple boring v8 anyway, especailly american made? Rotary power!!! Isnt that what RX's are all about? On the topic. I was told(by majestic turbo) that the S5 spools slower because of the larger hot side. But it has larger wastegate(s). And I thought it was the S4 that used the twin scroll design, isnt that what that extra actuator on the exhaust manifold is for?
Ladies, ladies, let's try to think with our more elevated heads here, the S5 came with higher stock boost than the S4. That was the main difference in source of extra power with the series change.
Don't discriminate against Real American Cubic Inches..... there is plenty of room in the FC's chest for some real muscle. The frame is very strong, the heart is weak.
Don't discriminate against Real American Cubic Inches..... there is plenty of room in the FC's chest for some real muscle. The frame is very strong, the heart is weak.
Trending Topics
Ok so you get coil overs, what makes them better then? I think they both have things that people want. But I think over all there were reasons Mazda's well versed engineers had a few reasons to make a new series. Generally this is done to make beneficial changes. But hey what do those crazy people at mazda know?
Last edited by cpubugs; May 11, 2006 at 08:43 PM.
Originally Posted by cpubugs
Ok so you get coil overs, what makes them better then? I think they both have things that people want. But I think over all there were reasons Mazda's well versed engineers had a few reasons to make a new series. Generally this is done to make beneficial changes. But hey what do those crazy people at mazda know?
Originally Posted by tjeter
Yeah i really just want to know the advantages and differences and the max whp each will produce... please
Other than the wastegate I haven't personally noticed much of a difference in performance - turbo wise - on these cars between series.
As far as which series is better, each obviously has its ups and downs but many of the changes made to the S5 model were to reduce costs, not necessairily make it a better car. I don't think they intentionally made it a worse performer either, its simply that some of things that were changed turned out overtime to be more lax on the S5, such as the pastic "dog bone" stabilizer links.
the s5 car ran slightly more boost from the factory and had higher compression rotors.
the s5 turbo is better, it has a divided manifold, no twin scroll crap, the s5 AFM is better, the s5 ECU actually has a useful CEL.
the s5 turbo is better, it has a divided manifold, no twin scroll crap, the s5 AFM is better, the s5 ECU actually has a useful CEL.
Last edited by jacobcartmill; May 12, 2006 at 12:36 AM.
The S5's fully divided manifold means the strong pulses generated in the exhaust ports travel all the way to the turbine wheel and hit the blades with greater force. In the S4's common manifold some of the effect of these pulses was lost. The result is quicker spooling and less lag. The dual wastegate wasn't really about more flow (the S4's small wastegate port works fine on a stock car), but about keeping the front and rear exhaust pulses completely separated.
The compressor housing, compressor wheel and CRHA are the same, so peak power won't be improved by swapping on the S5 turbo, but a more responsive turbo means engine will receive boost sooner when you put your foot down and hence the car will accelerate faster.
(Edit...Remove reference to deleted post)
The compressor housing, compressor wheel and CRHA are the same, so peak power won't be improved by swapping on the S5 turbo, but a more responsive turbo means engine will receive boost sooner when you put your foot down and hence the car will accelerate faster.
(Edit...Remove reference to deleted post)
Last edited by Aaron Cake; May 12, 2006 at 10:35 AM.
most hybrids omit the twin scroll and port the runners larger than stock S5 runners anyways. there is no benefit to either turbo aside from possibly the wastegate, of which is modified much larger anyways.
Originally Posted by Karack
most hybrids omit the twin scroll and port the runners larger than stock S5 runners anyways.
there is no benefit to either turbo...
Originally Posted by jacobcartmill
i totally agree with jason.
whats been the deal with people being totally dumbfounded with the turbos on their cars on here lately?
whats been the deal with people being totally dumbfounded with the turbos on their cars on here lately?
Originally Posted by 88IntegraLS
Given the "dual scroll" feature (or whatever it was called) that the S5 units had, some kind of changing exhaust gas vector toward the impeller with rpm changes in the engine, it would be a reasonable expectation for the S5 unit to spool quicker and / or at a lower rpm.
................
................
The dual-scroll feature was only featured on the S4 TurboII's and removed on the S5 Turbo. Just look at the bottom of the S5 Turbos and you will find no actuator for the twin scroll.
Forget a turbo just throw in a big heavy american v8. Its the only way us stupid americans can make power. Personally I would run the s5 because of the wastegate. Its safer(stock) to control the boost levels at anything above stock. I replaced my s4 unit with an s5 and it spools a little slower but not much.
Originally Posted by 87RX27
Forget a turbo just throw in a big heavy american v8. Its the only way us stupid americans can make power.
finally someone speaks the truth...
but I would say s5 because of the bigger wastegate that should be ported.
Forget a turbo just throw in a big heavy american v8.
Its the only way us stupid americans can make power
. Try to be a lil more open minded


