2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

Rx8 Tranny on FC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-25-07, 07:44 PM
  #1  
Full Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Thedays's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Montreal
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rx8 Tranny on FC

Hi,

I would like to know if is possible to fit rx8 Tranny on TII engine ? Is it easy to instal it or I need to change some part....
Thedays is offline  
Old 10-25-07, 07:47 PM
  #2  
not a drifter

iTrader: (133)
 
87 t-66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 9,337
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
possible, yes. but why? if you have to ask its probably too hard for you.
87 t-66 is offline  
Old 10-25-07, 07:52 PM
  #3  
Learned alot | Alot to go

iTrader: (2)
 
CrackHeadMel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Rotaryland, New Hampshire
Posts: 4,232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
bolts onto the bellhousing, crossmember is prob diff, not sure if shifter locations are the same. doubt driveshaft will fit
CrackHeadMel is offline  
Old 10-25-07, 07:53 PM
  #4  
Full Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Thedays's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Montreal
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 87 t-66
possible, yes. but why?
I need to change my tranny and the RX8 tranny is like new with 6 speed with short speed....sorry I dont know what is the name for this in english.

Can I install the RX-8 6 speed transmission into my 2nd Gen RX-7?
5th gear on the FE tranny is the same as the 4th on FC trannys anyway, so there is no real advantage of using the RX-8 tranny, and 6th on the FE tranny is actually taller (.83 vs .71) than the FC, resulting in lower gas mileage at highway speeds.
Using a RX-8 tranny would be like adding a extra gear between 2nd and 3rd to a standard 2nd gen RX-7 M or R type transmission.

Add in, that the RX-8 6 speed transmission is also about 4 inches too short, forcing you either to relocate the shifter 4 inches forward in the car, or move the engine 4 inches backward (towards the firewall) to make it fit in the stock shifter location.

Last edited by Aaron Cake; 10-30-07 at 08:36 AM. Reason: Merge two posts
Thedays is offline  
Old 10-25-07, 08:05 PM
  #5  
DGRRX

iTrader: (3)
 
djmtsu's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 2,243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Did you just answer your own question? WTF?

Also, it has issues dealing with the HP in an RX-8. Have fun with a TII.
djmtsu is offline  
Old 10-25-07, 08:23 PM
  #6  
Epilepsy

 
Eple's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: ..
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
from what i can remember there is no real benefit in upgrading to the RX-8 6 Speed. The gearing in gear 5 and 6 is practically the same as gear 5 in a T2 tranny. Just get your T2 tranny rebuilt.

EDIT* OP beat me to it...by answering his own question??
Eple is offline  
Old 10-25-07, 09:07 PM
  #7  
Winter sucks

 
micah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Newberg, Oregon
Posts: 3,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Thedays
Can I install the RX-8 6 speed transmission into my 2nd Gen RX-7?
5th gear on the FE tranny is the same as the 4th on FC trannys anyway, so there is no real advantage of using the RX-8 tranny, and 6th on the FE tranny is actually taller (.83 vs .71) than the FC, resulting in lower gas mileage at highway speeds.
Using a RX-8 tranny would be like adding a extra gear between 2nd and 3rd to a standard 2nd gen RX-7 M or R type transmission.

Add in, that the RX-8 6 speed transmission is also about 4 inches too short, forcing you either to relocate the shifter 4 inches forward in the car, or move the engine 4 inches backward (towards the firewall) to make it fit in the stock shifter location.
Yeah, unfortunately, I think you were misinformed on the ratios...

5th gear on the FC tranny is the same or near 6th on an RX8.. 4th is 1:1 same as the RX8's 5th gear.... The only thing they did was split 2nd or 3rd into 2 gears (I can't remember which).
micah is offline  
Old 10-25-07, 09:41 PM
  #8  
Wish he had a running rx7

 
RX7freak08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 1,180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So it is not possible to use the RX8 Transmission on it.
RX7freak08 is offline  
Old 10-25-07, 09:43 PM
  #9  
Winter sucks

 
micah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Newberg, Oregon
Posts: 3,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RX7freak08
So it is not possible to use the RX8 Transmission on it.
ANYTHING is possible... whether or not its feasible is another thing..

It is NOT a direct swap.
micah is offline  
Old 10-25-07, 10:28 PM
  #10  
Moderator

iTrader: (3)
 
diabolical1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: FL
Posts: 10,809
Received 304 Likes on 265 Posts
Originally Posted by djmtsu
Did you just answer your own question? WTF?
funny as it seems, and it is quite funny ... i commend him for searching at 16 posts. good job.

and as far as your question is concerned, stick with a T2 tranny.
diabolical1 is offline  
Old 10-25-07, 10:33 PM
  #11  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
The RX-8 trans cannot handle the potential of a 13BT.
Be prepared to swap out the transmission when it breaks...


-Ted
RETed is offline  
Old 10-25-07, 11:00 PM
  #12  
Wish he had a running rx7

 
RX7freak08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 1,180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I bet i'm stupid for asking this question but wont a 6th gear transmission allow you to have high top speeds.
RX7freak08 is offline  
Old 10-25-07, 11:03 PM
  #13  
Winter sucks

 
micah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Newberg, Oregon
Posts: 3,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RX7freak08
I bet i'm stupid for asking this question but wont a 6th gear transmission allow you to have high top speeds.
You are correct. Your stupid.

No. You'll have to shift through 1 more gear to get to the same place 5th is on an FC.
micah is offline  
Old 10-25-07, 11:07 PM
  #14  
Wish he had a running rx7

 
RX7freak08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 1,180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ahhhh so what about gas mileage would it be the same as well.
RX7freak08 is offline  
Old 10-25-07, 11:09 PM
  #15  
Winter sucks

 
micah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Newberg, Oregon
Posts: 3,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yep
micah is offline  
Old 10-25-07, 11:13 PM
  #16  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by RX7freak08
I bet i'm stupid for asking this question but wont a 6th gear transmission allow you to have high top speeds.
Cause you're probably thinking they just slapped on another overdrive gear versus the 5-speed...
This is usually not the case.

This is the current specs off the Mazda USA website...
http://www.mazdausa.com/MusaWeb/disp...ode=RX8&bhcp=1
3.760
2.269
1.645
1.187
1.000
0.843

Notice the 1.000 ratio is the *5th gear* of the 6-speed transmission.
On all FC turbo (and non-turbo) transmissions, the 4th gear is 1.000.
Zenki FC turbo 5th gear ratio is 0.762.
Kouki FC turbo 5th gear ratio is 0.719.
Non-turbo 5th gear ratios are even taller - 0.70x?
So technically, ANY of the FC transmissions will give you a higher top speed versus the RX-8 6-speed trans.

Most 6-speed transmissions just add an extra gear in the middle...

1st gear for both 5-speed and 6-speed
---->6-speed 2nd gear
5-speed 2nd gear
---->6-speed 3rd gear
5-speed 3rd gear
---->6-speed 4th gear
4th gear for 5-speed and 5th gear for 6-speed - usually 1.000 ratio
5th gear for 5-speed and 6th gear for 6-speed - overdrive ratio

Does that makes sense?


-Ted
RETed is offline  
Old 10-30-07, 06:43 AM
  #17  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
TitaniumTT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,970
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
No - becuase it's wrong

There is so much bullshit in this thread I don't know where to start so lets pick it apart one at a time

It does bolt to the back of the motor but thats it. You need the RX8 starter, a turbo flywheel & clutch and an adapter plate to mate an FB slave and have it all work properly

The driveshaft will not work

The shift is 3.5 inches forward and there are 3 options
1) Move the motor back 3.5 inches
2) Hack your interior to hell
3) Do what I'm going to do.

The trans will handle the power of an RX8, the trans will handle the power of a modded TII @ the trans will handle the power of a 310hp 9,000 RPM P-Port on the race track with a slight modification to the internals of the trans intself. What the trans WON'T handle is speed shifting, jamming gears and driving like an idiot. But than again NO trans will tolerate that for very long. Yes it is true that the FE trans has a bad rep and it does break easier than most. DO a little research on RX8club.com and you'll find that trans behind a drag race 600hp 20B - weak trans my ***.

You'll need a custom mount as well.

Now the best for last - here is a comparision of the FE trans VS a USDM S5 TII trans - STOP SAYING ALL THEY DID IS STICK ONE GEAR BETWEEN TWO OTHERS!!!! TOTALLY AND COMPLETELY WRONG!!!!!
Attached Thumbnails Rx8 Tranny on FC-speedvsrpm.jpg  
TitaniumTT is offline  
Old 10-30-07, 08:59 AM
  #18  
RIP Mark

iTrader: (2)
 
YaNi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Dublin, OH
Posts: 657
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Thanks for the schweet graph to clear things up
YaNi is offline  
Old 10-30-07, 05:36 PM
  #19  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by TitaniumTT
The trans will handle the power of an RX8, the trans will handle the power of a modded TII @ the trans will handle the power of a 310hp 9,000 RPM P-Port on the race track with a slight modification to the internals of the trans intself. What the trans WON'T handle is speed shifting, jamming gears and driving like an idiot. But than again NO trans will tolerate that for very long. Yes it is true that the FE trans has a bad rep and it does break easier than most. DO a little research on RX8club.com and you'll find that trans behind a drag race 600hp 20B - weak trans my ***.
How about we put it this way...
We built two identical "high power" motors...
One runs an SE3P (drop the stupid "FE" ****, cause MAZDA calls it an SE3P) trans and the other runs an FC turbo trans...
Which trans is going to blow up first?
I put money on the SE3P trans blowing up first...


Now the best for last - here is a comparision of the FE trans VS a USDM S5 TII trans - STOP SAYING ALL THEY DID IS STICK ONE GEAR BETWEEN TWO OTHERS!!!! TOTALLY AND COMPLETELY WRONG!!!!!
Actually, your graph SUPPORTS what I said...
1st gear is basically the same for both transmissions.
6-speed 2nd, 3rd, and 4th gears are almost exactly IN BETWEEN the 5-speed 2nd and 3rd gears...
Your graph shows the truth.
You don't know what the **** you're talking about...



-Ted
RETed is offline  
Old 10-30-07, 07:34 PM
  #20  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
TitaniumTT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,970
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I never said the TII trans wasn't stronger, I just said the the FE 6spd isn't as weak as people bitch and moan about.

And please don't get all bent out of shape & butt-hurt becuase someone goes ahead and provides fact that proves you wrong or disagrees with your OPINION. God forbid someone should disagree with the great Ted of many avatars. My graph shows that they didn't just stick a gear in between two existing ones which you and a few other high post count people on this forum seem to stick by as fact.
Originally Posted by Ted
1st gear for both 5-speed and 6-speed
---->6-speed 2nd gear
5-speed 2nd gear
---->6-speed 3rd gear
5-speed 3rd gear
---->6-speed 4th gear
4th gear for 5-speed and 5th gear for 6-speed - usually 1.000 ratio
5th gear for 5-speed and 6th gear for 6-speed - overdrive ratio
Do you see the bolded red? Does the graph support that? My graph proves that ALL the gears are tighter. Should I draw you a picture to what you are discribing? Almost the same and the same are different by definition. "Almost exactely" huh? I wouldn't depend on one of your engines in a race. It takes a man to admit when he's wrong - can you do that?

Ask a few people that actually RACE these things and they'll agree that while the box needs some work, the ratios are much better.

You don't know what the **** you're talking about regarding this subject and when someone disagrees with the "great" Ted, you start calling people names and change your avatar.
TitaniumTT is offline  
Old 10-30-07, 07:37 PM
  #21  
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Icemark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Rohnert Park CA
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 19 Posts
Why are the shift points so low on the FE (because that is what Mazda has on the VIN-Ted) in the graph? 9000 rpm redline... not 7000 (and of course the 13BT from the FC really runs out of power at 6500 anyway, due to ignition and breathing issues), so top speed in a gear should be 6500 in the FC, not 7800.

And that graph shows a clear extra gear shoved in between 2rd and 3rd...kinda like Ted said.

Then toss in that the Reni and FE tranny combo is designed to run the motor at 3000 rpm at 60 MPH (not just above 2000 like the FC/FD) for optimum gas efficiency at freeway speeds. How do you get around that? Drop rear end gearing so that the car really doesn't have ***** at the stoplight?

So TitaniumTT seems you are having a hard sell to justify the RX-8 tranny into anything but a Miata and an RX-8. I have thought long and hard about putting the FE tranny into a Turbo FC as well, but came to the conclusion that due to the 5th and 6th gear ratios on the FE, that there is no real advantage when comparing it too a FC R type tranny. Now if 6th gear was at .615 or something like that... then I can see an advantage... but it is not.

So what sort of advantage is there to make this swap on a FC or FD...other than being a ricer to have the extra 3rd gear?

After all you were the one that posted this:

Originally Posted by TitaniumTT
How much you want for the blown tranny? It won't fit without a shitton of work and hacking your interior BTW
about a blown FE tranny that the guy wanted to put into his RX-7.

Originally Posted by TitaniumTT
You don't know what the **** you're talking about regarding this subject and when someone disagrees with the "great" Ted, you start calling people names and change your avatar.
getting awfully close to flaming in your reply... better watch it. Keep it on track of the subject.

Not on attacking someone who's opinion you may not agree with.
Icemark is offline  
Old 10-30-07, 07:50 PM
  #22  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
TitaniumTT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,970
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Yes I did post that becuase I do plan on dropping that trans in my car for reasons mentioned below. I can do the work and I have an idea how to make the shifter fit and retain my interior. I wanted the trans because buying a blown one dirt cheap and having it rebuilt and modded is cheaper than buying it already rebuilt and modded. If I can save a few $$, why not? I spoke the truth did I not? It is bunch of work, some tools that the average person doesn't have are needed, & unless you're creative, you need to butcher your interior. What's 3.5" forward of a stock FC shifter.

Originally Posted by Icemark
Why are the shift points so low on the FE (because that is what Mazda has on the VIN-Ted) in the graph? 9000 rpm redline... not 7000 (and of course the 13BT from the FC really runs out of power at 6500 anyway, due to ignition and breathing issues), so top speed in a gear should be 6500 in the FC, not 7800.
My setup should be good to ~7500rpms and it would also be beneficial in my setup to keep rpms above 4500 when upshifting so really tight gears are to my benefit.

Originally Posted by Icemark
Then toss in that the Reni and FE tranny combo is designed to run the motor at 3000 rpm at 60 MPH (not just above 2000 like the FC/FD) for optimum gas efficiency at freeway speeds. How do you get around that? Drop rear end gearing so that the car really doesn't have ***** at the stoplight?
My commute is 53 miles and not one foot of it is on the highway so cruising speeds is really not of a concern to me. I did the math and yes it is something around a 10% drop in effiecency. But that's what I have my 22mpg Cherokee for. I didn't buy or build this car for effiecency - I built it for fun. I'd like to keep the rpms above 4500 during upshifts and not spiking of the revlimiter ALL the time would be nice during some spirited driving.

Originally Posted by Icemark
So TitaniumTT seems you are having a hard sell to justify the RX-8 tranny into anything but a Miata and an RX-8. I have thought long and hard about putting the FE tranny into a Turbo FC as well, but came to the conclusion that due to the 5th and 6th gear ratios on the FE, that there is no real advantage when comparing it too a FC R type tranny. Now if 6th gear was at .615 or something like that... then I can see an advantage... but it is not.
Even if the overdrive was just on-par with the Type R tranny it would be an almost perfect trans. Yes I agree getting it even closer to a .615-.7 would be better but like I said - my commute doesn't take me on the highway so for ME, for a fun commute car/auto-x/track car the FE trans would be advantageous to any FC trans.

Last edited by TitaniumTT; 10-30-07 at 07:55 PM.
TitaniumTT is offline  
Old 10-30-07, 08:07 PM
  #23  
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Icemark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Rohnert Park CA
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 19 Posts
Originally Posted by TitaniumTT
Yes I did post that becuase I do plan on dropping that trans in my car for reasons mentioned below. I can do the work and I have an idea how to make the shifter fit and retain my interior. I wanted the trans because buying a blown one dirt cheap and having it rebuilt and modded is cheaper than buying it already rebuilt and modded. If I can save a few $$, why not? I spoke the truth did I not? It is bunch of work, some tools that the average person doesn't have are needed, & unless you're creative, you need to butcher your interior. What's 3.5" forward of a stock FC shifter.


My setup should be good to ~7500rpms and it would also be beneficial in my setup to keep rpms above 4500 when upshifting so really tight gears are to my benefit.



My commute is 53 miles and not one foot of it is on the highway so cruising speeds is really not of a concern to me. I did the math and yes it is something around a 10% drop in effiecency. But that's what I have my 22mpg Cherokee for. I didn't buy or build this car for effiecency - I built it for fun. I'd like to keep the rpms above 4500 during upshifts and not spiking of the revlimiter ALL the time would be nice during some spirited driving.



Even if the overdrive was just on-par with the Type R tranny it would be an almost perfect trans. Yes I agree getting it even closer to a .615-.7 would be better but like I said - my commute doesn't take me on the highway so for ME, for a fun commute car/auto-x/track car the FE trans would be advantageous to any FC trans.
Much better reply, thank you!
Icemark is offline  
Old 10-30-07, 08:46 PM
  #24  
Clean.

iTrader: (1)
 
ericgrau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 2,521
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

The 3.46 final drive ratio option was to give the same rpm in high gear, to make things fair. As you can see the RX-8 tranny is almost exactly the same as the FC tranny, except for one extra gear between 4th and 5th (not between 2nd and 3rd!).


EDIT: This graph shows average rpm vs. mph. The graph starts right after the shift from 1st to 2nd. i.e., the first "step" on the staircase is your average rpm in 2nd gear. As you can see a direct swap to the RX-8 tranny does let you keep your rpms about 200-300 higher on average, which isn't bad. But the higher drive ratio will also hurt fuel economy. Once we equalize things in high gear (for unchanged freeway mileage), you get 100rpm in 2nd and 4th and that's about it (assuming you even redline in 4th). Where the RX-8 tranny really shines is that narrow change in ratios from 5th to 6th... which is entirely useless for anything except economy. It gives you a more economical gear to downshift into instead of 4th when going over hills.

Sources:
tire size: http://www.teamfc3s.org/main/tips.php
figuring out tire diameter from tire size: http://www.1010tires.com/TireSizeCalculator.asp
stock tranny (NA) gear ratios: http://howto.globalvicinity.com/gv_w...i=87&co=1&vi=1
RX-8 tranny gear ratios: http://www.rx8club.com/archive/index.php/t-21206.html
Attached Thumbnails Rx8 Tranny on FC-rx8trannyinfc.gif   Rx8 Tranny on FC-rx8trannyinfc-averagerpm.gif  

Last edited by ericgrau; 10-30-07 at 09:15 PM.
ericgrau is offline  
Old 10-30-07, 08:50 PM
  #25  
The Silent but Deadly Mod

iTrader: (2)
 
Roen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NYC/T.O.
Posts: 4,047
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
While it may work for the few that don't have highway commutes, I just want to point out that, all else being equal, the SE's 6th gear will have less gas efficiency than the FC's 5th gear. I've been told be many that it's not the case, but based on my own experiments with a NA and a GTUs, the one with the higher gearing is less gas efficient at cruising speeds.
Roen is offline  


Quick Reply: Rx8 Tranny on FC



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:39 AM.