2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

RX-7 N/A Headers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 29, 2005 | 08:16 PM
  #26  
evileagle's Avatar
Thread Starter
Reverse Cerberus
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,789
Likes: 11
From: Vancouver, WA
Originally Posted by Roddimus Prime
any updates it's been almost 2 weeks.

Been real busy lately. Finally have some time on the lift here shortly to start testing fitment and then it's off to the dyno!
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2005 | 10:42 PM
  #27  
banzaitoyota's Avatar
What Subscription?
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 5,926
Likes: 2
From: Aiken SC USA
Last set of Dyno runs yielded 12 HP more than a Racing Beat Road Race Header., but more importantly, the header recently shattered the EP lap record at Roebling Roads. If you so desire the collector can be lengthened to make to a stock exhaust system.


So How are you documenting the results of your header? Are you back purging your TIG welds? What grade SS are you using?

Last edited by banzaitoyota; Apr 29, 2005 at 10:44 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2005 | 11:01 PM
  #28  
evileagle's Avatar
Thread Starter
Reverse Cerberus
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,789
Likes: 11
From: Vancouver, WA
Originally Posted by banzaitoyota
Last set of Dyno runs yielded 12 HP more than a Racing Beat Road Race Header., but more importantly, the header recently shattered the EP lap record at Roebling Roads. If you so desire the collector can be lengthened to make to a stock exhaust system.


So How are you documenting the results of your header? Are you back purging your TIG welds? What grade SS are you using?


Christ son! Calm down! I don't do the dirty work, they just told me "Go see what people think of this, and if it's positive, we'll dump some money into it."


But as for documenting it's gonna be with a wideband O2, a dyno, and a datalogger. You know, how most people document horsepower...

Last edited by evileagle; Apr 29, 2005 at 11:05 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2005 | 11:14 PM
  #29  
Rx-7Doctor's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,584
Likes: 12
From: Oregon
Header

It would be great to have a header that would bolt straight up to the factory cat
for those of you in states that allow the modification of exhaust. In Ca unless it has a CARB exempt # you cannot have it on the car for smog. Which means that
It will not pass the visual even thought the cat is in place. For those of you that
can run a header but have to have the cat. It's simple, buy anytype of header you want and buy the appropriate flange that bolts to the header and a flange that bolts to the stock cat. Take it down to the local muffler guy and for $20-$25. they
will make you a pipe, it's no big thing. rx7doctor
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2005 | 11:23 PM
  #30  
banzaitoyota's Avatar
What Subscription?
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 5,926
Likes: 2
From: Aiken SC USA
What Material are you using? What are you welding it with? What Primary length? Where are you tuning for peak torque? How are you compensating for expansion? There is a hell of a lot more to header manufacturing than tacking some pipe together.

So just to be clear. You havent tested this header at all. HOW MANY HOURS, not pulls, HOURS of testing is this header going to have when you sell the first one?
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2005 | 12:09 AM
  #31  
Mint87RX7's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 998
Likes: 0
From: chicago land
^dude, we know you make a good header. but for those of us that dont want to spend $500, i would like to see what this guy can come up with.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2005 | 01:18 AM
  #32  
evileagle's Avatar
Thread Starter
Reverse Cerberus
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,789
Likes: 11
From: Vancouver, WA
Originally Posted by banzaitoyota
What Material are you using? What are you welding it with? What Primary length? Where are you tuning for peak torque? How are you compensating for expansion? There is a hell of a lot more to header manufacturing than tacking some pipe together.

So just to be clear. You havent tested this header at all. HOW MANY HOURS, not pulls, HOURS of testing is this header going to have when you sell the first one?

What is it exactly that makes you feel the need to be such a *****?

All I'm saying is that it will be well tested, it will be built from quality materials, and it isn't going to cost a ton of money. This isn't some startup that has to jack up prices in order to cover initial overhead.

It's going to be ok, just take a deep breath.

A little friendly competition never hurt anyone.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2005 | 02:30 AM
  #33  
rotarygod's Avatar
Rotors still spinning
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,181
Likes: 23
From: Houston
So much misinformation here. Even the Pacesetter header will yield VERY noticable power gains over the stock exhaust manifold. Can it be improved upon? Yes, but for the price it is a good deal. Not everyone is willing to pay $500 for a set of headers. I've had both the Racing Beat and the Pacesetter headers. They both work very well compared to stock. There is always a better product out there somewhere though. I currently run a custom made system that I built.

Designing a very good performing header is not as hard as it is made to sound. It is very difficult to design a true header that can't outperform the stock exhaust manifold. You can guess and beat that cast iron shoebox. I guarantee that on this forum, a cheap header that provides some gains over stock will outsell an expensive header that provides a bigger gain. Most of these guys aren't rich and don't have alot to spend. If money were no object, then the SDJ headers would be a great purchase. I'm sure they perform very well. They do look great. The one with the H-pipe in the middle is an interesting design.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2005 | 03:23 AM
  #34  
DAharon's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
From: Campbell, CA
I would also be very interested in a reasonably priced header for my NA. But one thing I would like to suggest, since I live in CA and they can get pretty strict around here about smog, is that you put some small brackets on the header that would allow us to attach the stock heat shield to it. They don't have to exactly match up to the stock holes, I can drill my own, they just have to allow the heat shield to cover the header and look stock.
Reply
Old May 1, 2005 | 02:41 PM
  #35  
Roddimus Prime's Avatar
W.O.M.P.
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
Yeah, I'm sure the $500 header is a quality piece but when I only paid $150 for the whole car a $500 header is out of the question. I was going to just order the monza header and be done with uit. I don't need anything cosmetically pretty or track proven on the greatest race circuits in the world. I just want something better than stock that won't cost more than my car did.
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2005 | 05:17 PM
  #36  
pd_day's Avatar
Spoolin'
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,802
Likes: 43
From: Miss.
I think SDJ has another design for the 13B header...
Do you have info on it? The SDJ website is currently down.
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2005 | 10:28 AM
  #37  
Icemark's Avatar
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 24
From: Rohnert Park CA
Originally Posted by rotarygod
So much misinformation here. Even the Pacesetter header will yield VERY noticable power gains over the stock exhaust manifold.
See I disagree. It is the downpipe that is the clog on the non turbo when using a collected system at any point. The stock manifold is just fine when a good down pipe is used to replace the stock downpipe and pre-cats.

In fact with a stock engine there will be a pretty minimal HP difference between using a collected header like the pacesetter vs the stock exhaust manifold and a down pipe.
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2005 | 01:10 PM
  #38  
RockLobster's Avatar
Let's get silly...
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,718
Likes: 10
From: Rosemount, MN
Originally Posted by Icemark
See I disagree. It is the downpipe that is the clog on the non turbo when using a collected system at any point. The stock manifold is just fine when a good down pipe is used to replace the stock downpipe and pre-cats.

In fact with a stock engine there will be a pretty minimal HP difference between using a collected header like the pacesetter vs the stock exhaust manifold and a down pipe.
This has been dyno proven more than once. The simple fact is without doing some crazy stuff on the intake side you will not see much gain between the racing beat downpipe/stock exhaust manifold vs the racing beat (or any other) header.

It's just louder.
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2005 | 04:54 PM
  #39  
mrb455's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
From: Toledo OH
I have a 88 n/a and I got a header from a 7 shop in AZ installed that bolted up to the cat for $200
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2005 | 05:54 PM
  #40  
inflatablepets's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,473
Likes: 0
From: St Louis
While I agree that Banzai makes a quality product, and has decent metthods for doing things, he doesn't need to be such a cocky jerk.
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2005 | 05:54 PM
  #41  
firestarter810's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
From: Windsor, Ontario
"A little competition never hurt anyone"

So true...this kind of competition will drive prices down.

And I respect that obviously a lot of work and effort went into making a quality piece (SDJ ) ... but I don't respect your kind of rant to discredit someone who is in the R&D phase of product development. It's this very kind of tactics that drives customer's away.

That being said, I don't know if $500 is too much to spend for a header, if they perform as advertised. The old adage of how fast do you want to spend certainly applies here. I've never built a performance exhaust system, but I've ported and polished and flowbenched my own heads. It's an exhausting process if you want to get it right. And if I was doing it for someone else, I'd expect to be compensated for my time.

I'm just interested in knowing what everyone has to offer, before I make my decision. And I won't be bullied into it, either.
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2005 | 07:52 PM
  #42  
rotarygod's Avatar
Rotors still spinning
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,181
Likes: 23
From: Houston
I had a downpipe on my old '88 for a long time without a cat. The night I installed the Pacesetter header, the power gain wasn't even funny. It isn't like it was a slight amount that I might have felt due to a miscalibration of the butt dyno. It was a very big change. The Racing Beat header that I had also made a nice difference. The stock downpipe may be a problem but the biggest is the fact that the engine dumps through nonexistent length primaries into a plenum chamber stock manifold and then finds it's way out. There is practically no tuning this way and it doesn't encourage scavenging like a header does. Yes different headers are going to give you different performance gains. Some more than others. It is very hard to not outdo the stock manifold though. There is almost nothing that could get worse than it.
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2005 | 09:19 AM
  #43  
RockLobster's Avatar
Let's get silly...
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,718
Likes: 10
From: Rosemount, MN
Maybe some placebo efect? Without numbers I am very sceptical. A guy who lives near me has a 91 vert with full RB exhaust (cat back, presilencer, header) on a fresh reman. It is not apreciably faster at all than my 90 GTU with the same exhaust only with a downpipe and stock manifold. My engine is 6.7-6.9 kg/cm2 on the compression graphs. Now yes there is an almost 300lbs wieght difference but you would think it wouild at least torque out more noticably in the midrange.

The effects of scavanging are not nearly as noticable or tunable for gobs of power on rotoaries because only two pulses can be tuned in primary flow design. Properly designed headers make much more direct difference on piston engines than rotories. Not that it isnt important it is just that there is not much to gain until you are flowing lots of gasses at higher RPMs. Quite simply back pressure from emissions (sound or gasses) controlling equipment is the main enemy of the rotary engine much more than piston engines. Again all of this is under the topic of mostly stock intake side of things.

There are MUCH WORSE stock manifold designs out there than ours. Take my 2003 tundra. The stock manifolds were so bad even changing to uneven length headers freed up 25 more hp and 20 ft-lbs of torque. The stock manifolds were AWEFUL. I should post a pic sometime. The reason for gains even without equal length headers was due to the truly poor stock manifold design.

This just isnt gonna happen on a 13b rotary. Because there are only two ports. Interference from one other pulse is much less than 2-3 others (or 3-7 others if tuning an x-dual exhaust)

Last edited by RockLobster; Jul 5, 2005 at 09:21 AM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
toplessFC3Sman
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
6
Mar 20, 2018 01:54 PM
The1Sun
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
7
Sep 18, 2015 07:13 PM
mulcryant
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
10
Sep 9, 2015 05:24 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:40 AM.