New cars have better seal sealers, galvanized metal, better coatings, etc.

 

new cars still rust... they just haven't yet.


Look at all the 10 year old cars that are uberrusty now, it'll be the same thing with brand new ones 10 years from now.

One day you'll find $300 rusted RX-8's with trashed interiors, it's just a fact of life.

 

Well, here's the deal...

Firstly, I want to thank everyone for all the helpful input. I think the RX-7 (2nd gen., anyway) is a fantastically fun car that's good in every way and that its unique engine is a masterpiece.

I have, however, decided against purchasing this specific RX-7 and an RX-7 in general. I honestly can't see myself having the ability to work mechnically with the car in the amount of depth to which it has been described to me, at least not at this point in time. Because of the social aspects of an RX's reliability (eg.: people who don't understand that a rotary engine has to be maintained differently), I believe it's a particularly substantial risk to buy a used one, not knowing it's history.

What I have purchased is a 1995 Nissan 240SX. I will admit, it's not as fast, not as good in the corners and not as exhilarating as an RX; but, ultimately, I think it's a better balance and a better car for me (and, hey, the 240 still is a hoot to drive! )

Thanks to all who helped me in making this decision! You never know -- maybe an RX is in my future

 

well I think we can close this thread then. If there is a reason to re-open in, then the Originator of the thread can PM any 2nd Gen RX-7 Technical section moderator.