2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

running rich... MPG is less than 14...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-03-07, 06:17 AM
  #51  
I'm a boost creep...

 
NZConvertible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by RETed
It's possible with almost all highway / freeway driving.
The key is to just fire the primaries only and keep the secondaries off - this right under 4kRPM.
This is a misleading statement. It's not whether the secondaries are on that's relevant; it's how much power you're asking for, i.e. your right foot.

Say you're in 5th gear on the highway at a constant speed, and the secondary injector switch-on point id 3800rpm. You will obviously use more fuel driving with the engine at 3900rpm (88mph) than you will with it at 3700rpm (83mph), but it's not because the secondaries are now firing, it's because you need ~17% more power to do it. The same is true when comparing 3600rpm (81mph) and 3400rpm (76mph), even though the secondaries aren't on at either speed. (Speeds are for an S4 TII.)

Originally Posted by FCKing1995
Guess thats another plug with a standalone or rtek ecu. Adjust the secondaries on long easy interstate drives so they stay off and save fuel.
No, it doesn't work like that at all. When the secondaries come on all four injectors fire at half the pulsewidth the primaries were firing at just before the transition. There is no sudden jump in the amount of fuel injected or AFR.

Originally Posted by chinkst3r
i forgot to ask... does not having emissions effect the gas mileage?
The only emissions device that affects mileage is the cat, and removing it can slightly improve mileage because the reduced restriction means less engine power is required for same performance. The rest of the system just adds air to the exhaust to reduce emissions, it doesn't affect how the engine runs.

i drive all over, my work and school are about 5-10 mins from the freeways, and my house is 15 mins from the freeways... however, after reinstalling the o2 sensor i've noticed a difference in how the engine reacts to the gas pedal...
No you didn't. The O2 sensor is only used during light-load cruising, no other time. As soon as you put your foot down it's ignored.

Originally Posted by s4Lt
I didn't read it cuz I didn't feel like wasting my time.
If you're not prepared to learn something new (and your posts prove you really need to do some learning), then you're already wasting your time just being here. Do yourself a favour and do some reading before posting any more on this thread so youdon't look quite so ignorant.

...the same amount of c4 as a grenade c4 wins hands down. SO the comparison is valid.
No, it's completely invalid. The octane rating has nothing to do with the energy content of fuel, so burning the same quantity results in the same power regardless of octane. If you weren't so lazy and had read some of the info you were given you'd have already learnt that.
Old 05-03-07, 06:49 AM
  #52  
I'm rotary for life!

 
s4Lt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by NZConvertible
No, it doesn't work like that at all. When the secondaries come on all four injectors fire at half the pulsewidth the primaries were firing at just before the transition.
Yeah sure, why not **sarcasm**

Last edited by s4Lt; 05-03-07 at 07:01 AM.
Old 05-03-07, 07:17 AM
  #53  
Rotary Freak

 
RotaMan99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 1,791
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah sure, why not **sarcasm**
Old 05-03-07, 07:25 AM
  #54  
I'm a boost creep...

 
NZConvertible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by s4Lt
Yeah sure, why not **sarcasm**
You actually think that's not right? Are you trying to make yourself look completely ignorant?
Old 05-03-07, 09:22 AM
  #55  
Full Member
 
so-mars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: raleigh
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by s4Lt
word, I think. Not quite sure what you wrote there, I think Shell has 93.
Are you agreeing with me?
LOL
dunno trying to wrap my head around the issue w/i the context of what other people are saying...

and from what peeps are saying it seems to me that i get a 'stronger kick' out of 93 because i can press on the gas pedal and i guess from what you are saying there's actually latency introduced into the system for the fuel to ignite... so a bit more fuel gets punched in between when you hit the accelerator and it ignites or whatever it does. probably a matter of 200-300ms delays or something but i do audio engineering stuff so am pretty tuned in down to about 2-8ms (well that and computer games and 2ms latency tft screens versus average 80ms latency lcd or sometimes up to 130ms latent vga cable to old crt monitor, which is more than cable modem latency is so its obviously a huge effect)

as for shell gas... the 'boutique' gas or however the refer to it is the 93 and that's what they put the most alien stuff into but yeh i guess if you guys say 89/91 also has detergent then its just the specialized stuff is in the premium 93

wikipedia has a chemistry explanation of octane but i couldnt really read it

from reading this i do get the idea that w/ 93 theres a bit of delay and subsequent more 'seeming kick' when the gas blows heh

quiet before the storm
Old 05-03-07, 10:17 PM
  #56  
Rotary Freak

 
RotaMan99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 1,791
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
and from what peeps are saying it seems to me that i get a 'stronger kick' out of 93 because i can press on the gas pedal and i guess from what you are saying there's actually latency introduced into the system for the fuel to ignite... so a bit more fuel gets punched in between when you hit the accelerator and it ignites or whatever it does. probably a matter of 200-300ms delays or something but i do audio engineering stuff so am pretty tuned in down to about 2-8ms (well that and computer games and 2ms latency tft screens versus average 80ms latency lcd or sometimes up to 130ms latent vga cable to old crt monitor, which is more than cable modem latency is so its obviously a huge effect
The same amount of fuel is being delivered. There is no fuel being injected when there is combustion, the injectors have already injected the amount of fuel they were supposed to inject into that one chamber. Don't be compairing computers to engines. Its like compairing Mars to a tree here on earth.

as for shell gas... the 'boutique' gas or however the refer to it is the 93 and that's what they put the most alien stuff into but yeh i guess if you guys say 89/91 also has detergent then its just the specialized stuff is in the premium 93
Huh, so, if this is true, which its not, what Special stuff do they put in?

wikipedia has a chemistry explanation of octane but i couldnt really read it
Then don't try to give advice in this topic.

from reading this i do get the idea that w/ 93 theres a bit of delay and subsequent more 'seeming kick' when the gas blows heh
I give up!
Old 05-03-07, 10:20 PM
  #57  
Rotary Freak

 
RotaMan99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 1,791
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think the one closest to the oil filter is where the fuel filter line goes. I could be wrong, its been years since I have had that nasty metal rack on my engine. Try looking under the intake manifold from the front of the engine and from the drivers side with a flahslight and see where it goes.
Old 05-04-07, 12:41 AM
  #58  
I'm a boost creep...

 
NZConvertible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by so-mars
and from what peeps are saying it seems to me that i get a 'stronger kick' out of 93 because i can press on the gas pedal and i guess from what you are saying there's actually latency introduced into the system for the fuel to ignite... so a bit more fuel gets punched in between when you hit the accelerator and it ignites or whatever it does...

from reading this i do get the idea that w/ 93 theres a bit of delay and subsequent more 'seeming kick' when the gas blows
No, it actually burns slower. There is no delay and there is no "kick", and anyone who claims that or thinks their car is faster just from using higher octane fuel is imagining it.

As has been said several times (not including what's in the links provided), octane rating is simply a measure of resistance to detonation, so higher octane allows more boost and/or more advanced ignition timing. Those will give you more power.

Seriously, if you guys aren't prepared to read and learn, you shouldn't be making wild guesses and nonsense claims, and you certainly shouldn't be arguing about it with people who have bothered to learn.
Old 05-04-07, 06:04 AM
  #59  
Full Member
 
so-mars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: raleigh
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
sorry neither of you two guys sound like you have a clue because you are contradicting yourself

it cannot burn slower w/o altering the timing and amount of fuel in play after injection, the two are mutually exclusive


unless of course you are saying that fuel disappears into a vacuum (probably one like your brain)
Old 05-04-07, 07:26 AM
  #60  
I'm a boost creep...

 
NZConvertible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by so-mars
it cannot burn slower w/o altering the timing and amount of fuel in play after injection, the two are mutually exclusive
You really need to go do some more reading on the subject. This has nothing to do with the amount of fuel injected, but does affect the ignition timing you can run. The higher the octane, the more heat energy is required to ignite it and the slower the flame propogates through the chamber during combustion. These two factor lower the chance of pre-ignition or detonation, and also allow the spark to be fired earlier to improve combustion efficiency.

unless of course you are saying that fuel disappears into a vacuum (probably one like your brain)
Good to see you can contribute to a technical discussion a mature manner, rather than resort to childish insults...
Old 05-04-07, 07:27 AM
  #61  
Rotary Freak

 
RotaMan99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 1,791
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think the one closest to the oil filter is where the fuel filter line goes. I could be wrong, its been years since I have had that nasty metal rack on my engine. Try looking under the intake manifold from the front of the engine and from the drivers side with a flahslight and see where it goes.
crap I just noticed my post above about the fuel line is in the wrong thread... oppss
Old 05-04-07, 09:07 AM
  #62  
Full Member
 
so-mars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: raleigh
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by NZConvertible
You really need to go do some more reading on the subject. This has nothing to do with the amount of fuel injected, but does affect the ignition timing you can run. The higher the octane, the more heat energy is required to ignite it and the slower the flame propogates through the chamber during combustion. These two factor lower the chance of pre-ignition or detonation, and also allow the spark to be fired earlier to improve combustion efficiency.

Good to see you can contribute to a technical discussion a mature manner, rather than resort to childish insults...
the other guy was being rude *shrug*

what i'm saying is that when you punch the accelerator, there is a SLIGHT delay before the fuel ignites and flame propogates w/ higher octane gas

meaning there's essentially a 'virtual time vacuum' introduced into the entire system that could cause it to seem like it has more PUNCH in the first say, second or so

then after that, negligible... (apparently)

which is exactly what i was saying before, but do you understand what i am saying now so you don't jump on my back for trying to go 'logical gating' on other peoples intellectual property? as IT systems architect i organize other peoples IP for a living
Old 05-04-07, 11:22 AM
  #63  
Rotary Freak

 
RotaMan99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 1,791
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the other guy was being rude *shrug*
Me? Good.
Old 05-04-07, 01:27 PM
  #64  
i love my rice!!!

Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
chinkst3r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Anaheim, CA
Posts: 685
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
wow, this simple thread has developed.... so whats the safest octane you guys are running on your T2s? i just fixed my exhaust leak, and all seems to be good so far, getting 16-17 MPG...
Old 05-04-07, 02:12 PM
  #65  
Senior Member

 
unW7WZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Houston
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
lol, i run 87 (need to be running 89 or 93, cuz i boost creep bad, and i dont wanna grenade the engine).
Old 05-04-07, 06:44 PM
  #66  
I'm a boost creep...

 
NZConvertible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by so-mars
the other guy was being rude
So be the bigger man.

what i'm saying is that when you punch the accelerator, there is a SLIGHT delay before the fuel ignites and flame propogates w/ higher octane gas

meaning there's essentially a 'virtual time vacuum' introduced into the entire system that could cause it to seem like it has more PUNCH in the first say, second or so
You're looking at two completely different time scales and not understanding the difference. You're talking about a one second on time, I'm talking about at even that takes milliseconds to occur. At say 2000prm when you "punch it", in the second you're talking about 33 combustions events have taken place (more if you accelerate in that time), all with about the same flame propagation speed.
Old 05-04-07, 08:01 PM
  #67  
Rotary Freak

 
RotaMan99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 1,791
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^ I was hoping you would clear that up. I needed to learn a little myself at this point.
Old 06-21-07, 03:05 PM
  #68  
Full Member
 
so-mars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: raleigh
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
btw... i am running with 89 now instead of 87 or 93...

and i can tell what you mean about it being tuned for 89


def would go with the 89 for best performance
Old 06-21-07, 10:00 PM
  #69  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by so-mars
btw... i am running with 89 now instead of 87 or 93...

and i can tell what you mean about it being tuned for 89


def would go with the 89 for best performance
Uh...no.


-Ted
Old 06-22-07, 02:11 AM
  #70  
Clean.

iTrader: (1)
 
ericgrau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 2,521
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I'm chuckling at the unrelated debates here. And the more unrelated the more misinformtion it contains.

Best option for mpg and other problems is keeping everything in shape. I get 24-25mph @ 85mph. I made sure to get a good '7 and do all the maintenance. And I got a lead foot. For best mileage, shift when your shift light says so; that's what it's there for.

octane: I'm only answering this particular side debate b/c it affects how much you spend on gas, which is why you want good mpg anyway. Octane equals knock protection. Octane ONLY equals knock protection. Better knock protection means a better safety net for high compression and high boost. Higher octane gas contains less energy, meaning both your mpg and power will always be lower. But it's better than knocking. A lot of high performance cars can't live without it. But it won't boost the performance of any car (see video below). Your car doesn't knock? You're wasting your money. Your car knocks? Is it an N/A or unmodified turbo? Fix your car before you blow your engine, high octane is just a band-aid here.

Here's an example to illustrate:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Njno_9UoRZc
Old 06-22-07, 10:25 AM
  #71  
i love my rice!!!

Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
chinkst3r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Anaheim, CA
Posts: 685
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
lol, eric this thread is so old... how'd u find it? well neways, u drive an na right? haha im talking about mpg for t2's...
Old 06-22-07, 11:24 AM
  #72  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by chinkst3r
lol, eric this thread is so old... how'd u find it?
It wasn't ericgrau's fault.
so-mars resurrected it again - check the date / time stamp.


-Ted
Old 06-22-07, 12:46 PM
  #73  
Clean.

iTrader: (1)
 
ericgrau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 2,521
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by chinkst3r
lol, eric this thread is so old... how'd u find it? well neways, u drive an na right? haha im talking about mpg for t2's...
Oh, then buy an N/A :P. Anyway, small world. See you at the BBQ. I'll get there quicker b/c I'm not stopping for gas, hehe.
Old 06-22-07, 03:57 PM
  #74  
i love my rice!!!

Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
chinkst3r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Anaheim, CA
Posts: 685
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LOL fo sho, hey are u still bringing wood?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trickster
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
25
07-01-23 04:40 PM
Tylerx7fb
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
39
05-27-19 12:45 PM
C. Ludwig
Single Turbo RX-7's
49
01-30-19 06:31 AM
Rotospectre
New Member RX-7 Technical
3
03-28-18 03:33 PM
The Shaolin
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
9
09-14-15 07:50 PM



Quick Reply: running rich... MPG is less than 14...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:44 AM.