Rtek7 ECU Upgrade
04-13-05, 06:28 PM
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Traiko
Where can this rtek be purchased from. I dont think I caught it mentioned in the thread yet (Or the other thread linked).
TIA
TIA
04-13-05, 06:49 PM
#28
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 4,236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You can get it at http://www.pocketlogger.com
04-13-05, 07:15 PM
#29
haven't heard of any dates as to when it is comming out but I heard henrik has been testing it for a while now and is supposedly on the last part of testing and then it's onto production. Here is a post from him a couple of days ago on teamfc3s.org.
"The logs were done with a 2.0 prototype which I've been
running and tweaking for the last couple of months. I just
ordered what should be the production boards and once
those are tested, its then on to final test, so yep its been
a long time but its close.
The VE table was just an interesting thing to do, it measures
how efficiently the engine "breathes". Its the ratio of actual
airflow to theoretical airflow. 100% would mean that the
engine injests the equivalent of 1.3 litres of air at the current
MAP reading per rev.
-Henrik "
for the hole thread go here http://www.teamfc3s.org/forum/showth...threadid=41228
"The logs were done with a 2.0 prototype which I've been
running and tweaking for the last couple of months. I just
ordered what should be the production boards and once
those are tested, its then on to final test, so yep its been
a long time but its close.
The VE table was just an interesting thing to do, it measures
how efficiently the engine "breathes". Its the ratio of actual
airflow to theoretical airflow. 100% would mean that the
engine injests the equivalent of 1.3 litres of air at the current
MAP reading per rev.
-Henrik "
for the hole thread go here http://www.teamfc3s.org/forum/showth...threadid=41228
Last edited by hondahater; 04-13-05 at 07:20 PM.
04-13-05, 07:21 PM
#30
i have a 1.5 and i love the built in fuel cut defenser, i hate cluttering up my engine bay with fairly useless devices...
the Rtek is mainly for protection but it does lower the secondady staging to 3500 RPMs so it does give you a longer power band at the sacrafice of fuel mileage.
my opinion: it is well worth the $95-125 for it.
the Rtek is mainly for protection but it does lower the secondady staging to 3500 RPMs so it does give you a longer power band at the sacrafice of fuel mileage.
my opinion: it is well worth the $95-125 for it.
04-13-05, 07:46 PM
#32
D.I.L.U.S.I.
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: L-Town pa
Posts: 2,051
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Version 2.0 will allow the user to select between 550/550, 550/720, as well as 720/720 primary/secondary injectors.
We will also be releasing an Rtek7 v 1.8 chip. Version 1.8 is exactly like version 1.7, but made for users that have 720 injectors for both primaries and secondaries.
im sooo glad the S4 guys can have something this good..
We will also be releasing an Rtek7 v 1.8 chip. Version 1.8 is exactly like version 1.7, but made for users that have 720 injectors for both primaries and secondaries.
im sooo glad the S4 guys can have something this good..
04-14-05, 01:48 AM
#35
D.I.L.U.S.I.
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: L-Town pa
Posts: 2,051
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i dont see why not, its been that way sence day one.. i just got on the wagon and if they drop it in a month or something and dont do a trade in dicount offer to upgrade to the V2.0 that would SUCK LOL.. .. ..
04-14-05, 07:12 AM
#36
87 T2
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: florida
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I wish the V2.0 was out already!!!!LOL Im getting a rebuild and from what I have read new rebuilds flood sometimes the first couple hundren miles, the unflooding would be great but I dont have the money to upgrade my injectors yet.
04-14-05, 10:33 AM
#37
Full Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Rivervale, NJ, USA
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Did anyone ever come to a conclusion about whether the 1.7 would be safe to run for people using the old GSL-SE (I think?) injectors as secondaries? If I remember correctly they were tested at about 680, but in the thread about it nobody seemed to have an answer as to whether they would be OK to run with the 1.7.
There is not that big a difference in flow but from what little I understand about it there may be differences in duty cycle too. Is this true? I have to admit to being pretty clueless about it myself.
There is not that big a difference in flow but from what little I understand about it there may be differences in duty cycle too. Is this true? I have to admit to being pretty clueless about it myself.
04-14-05, 11:35 AM
#39
Full Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sweet Home Alabama!!!
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by vhold
Did anyone ever come to a conclusion about whether the 1.7 would be safe to run for people using the old GSL-SE (I think?) injectors as secondaries? If I remember correctly they were tested at about 680, but in the thread about it nobody seemed to have an answer as to whether they would be OK to run with the 1.7.
There is not that big a difference in flow but from what little I understand about it there may be differences in duty cycle too. Is this true? I have to admit to being pretty clueless about it myself.
There is not that big a difference in flow but from what little I understand about it there may be differences in duty cycle too. Is this true? I have to admit to being pretty clueless about it myself.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
