2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Renesis---> Second Gen.?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 22, 2005 | 10:42 AM
  #1  
hexadec0079's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh NC
Renesis---> Second Gen.?

Since the Renesis has such power NA, would it be possible to swap into a second gen, or will it be as difficult as a REW engine?? Thanks, just wondering...
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2005 | 10:46 AM
  #2  
andrew lohaus's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,255
Likes: 0
From: fl
as tough as the rew. similar mounts that dont match the FC locations and you have to use a stand-alone ems and modify the engine for use by the standalone since the renesis ecu wont work outside of the rx-8 (throttle by wire, wheel speed sensor ect.).

if you want n/a power you are better off building up an s5 motor. with a good port and tuning they will make as much power as the renesis for a lot less money.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2005 | 10:48 AM
  #3  
1987RX7guy's Avatar
Eat Rice Don't Drive it.
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 12,752
Likes: 1
From: Laredo, Tx
A key thing you MUST learn is to search. This has been discussed at length. Honestly the simple answer imho is don't bother. You'd spend 10k dollars for 240bhp. You could be in the 400whp level for that kind of money.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2005 | 02:10 PM
  #4  
vipers's Avatar
IIMMM BBAAACCKKK!!
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,904
Likes: 1
From: redlands, cali
Originally Posted by 1987RX7guy
A key thing you MUST learn is to search. This has been discussed at length. Honestly the simple answer imho is don't bother. You'd spend 10k dollars for 240bhp. You could be in the 400whp level for that kind of money.
agreed..... if your going to go through the trouble and money of doing a swap like that, it would be more beneficial to swap a 13b-rew (more power, more torque)(but that swap is still more $$ than its worth).... but being cost effective, just swap a 13b-re and w/ the $$$$ you save, mod the crap out of it! ive heard that a 13b-re swap is not very difficult to do....


that was in regards to swapping motors.... i personally do think swapping motors is "cost effective" at all......
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2005 | 11:03 AM
  #5  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
Originally Posted by hexadec0079
Since the Renesis has such power NA, would it be possible to swap into a second gen, or will it be as difficult as a REW engine?? Thanks, just wondering...
Do you have the engine, engine harness, stock RX-8 ECU, and RX-8 FSM in hand?
If not, do you know how much all of that costs?
I've never seen an RX-8 for sale, but I do come across "rare" engines like 20B's (~$3,500) and 2JZ-GTE's (~$3,000) no problem on eBay.
This makes the RX-8 a bit of a rarity.


-Ted
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2005 | 11:20 AM
  #6  
Icemark's Avatar
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 24
From: Rohnert Park CA
well actually you could probably use a mega squirt for the ECU... but finding the engine, making the mounts and everything else would make the engine worth more than twice the price of the car.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2005 | 11:37 AM
  #7  
ddub's Avatar
i am legendary
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,478
Likes: 1
From: Kirkland, WA
Originally Posted by Icemark
well actually you could probably use a mega squirt for the ECU... but finding the engine, making the mounts and everything else would make the engine worth more than twice the price of the car.
Yep, megasquirt was recently used on an rx8 for the first time, it was pretty interesting for them to get it to control everything needed on the rx8, though.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2005 | 11:39 AM
  #8  
Icemark's Avatar
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 24
From: Rohnert Park CA
Originally Posted by dDuB
Yep, megasquirt was recently used on an rx8 for the first time, it was pretty interesting for them to get it to control everything needed on the rx8, though.
Do you have a link on that???
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2005 | 11:40 AM
  #9  
Beep777's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
I think a jet engine would be much cooler in a second gen anyhow. Does anyone know where I can get some custom motor mounts for that...:-)

Brian
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2005 | 11:45 AM
  #10  
ddub's Avatar
i am legendary
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,478
Likes: 1
From: Kirkland, WA
Originally Posted by Icemark
Do you have a link on that???
Original thread http://www.rx8club.com/showthread.php?t=65388

Post 161, page 11 is where rotarygod finally posts that it has been completed and is running http://www.rx8club.com/showpost.php?...&postcount=161
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2005 | 02:22 PM
  #11  
Aaron Cake's Avatar
Engine, Not Motor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,798
Likes: 128
From: London, Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by Icemark
well actually you could probably use a mega squirt for the ECU... but finding the engine, making the mounts and everything else would make the engine worth more than twice the price of the car.
You could, but I'm willing to bet that the result will be far inferior to the stock ECU. As we know, the stock ECU runs the 6 injectors, actuators in the intake passages, etc. etc. The Megasquirt's resolution is FAR LOWER then most of the other EMS systems. I'm not saying that it's a bad ECU, but I really wonder how well it will work on an engine that is as.....optimized...as the Renesis.

(I have nothing against the Megasquirt. I've installed a bunch of them on piston cars with great results. But in this application I have to wonder...)
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2005 | 02:29 PM
  #12  
Sideways7's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,598
Likes: 10
From: Temple, Texas (Central)
I think one of the main reasons the megasquirt is so good on fc's is that the ecu is 15+years old and uses an outdated method of measuring air flow (AFM). I don't know how the renisis' system works, but I bet it works much better.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2005 | 02:43 PM
  #13  
Aaron Cake's Avatar
Engine, Not Motor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,798
Likes: 128
From: London, Ontario, Canada
There's nothing wrong with the AFM. In fact, it makes a very robust system that is easy to mod and hard to blow up. Speed density systems (ie. Microtech, Megasquirt, Haltech, etc.) all measure load via manifold pressure. If you suddenly increase airflow, the ECU does not know this and the engine will run lean. You then need to retune all the fuel maps. Since the AFM directly measures areflow, the ECU is able to compensate for increases (to a point).
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2005 | 03:47 PM
  #14  
ddub's Avatar
i am legendary
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,478
Likes: 1
From: Kirkland, WA
Originally Posted by Aaron Cake
You could, but I'm willing to bet that the result will be far inferior to the stock ECU. As we know, the stock ECU runs the 6 injectors, actuators in the intake passages, etc. etc. The Megasquirt's resolution is FAR LOWER then most of the other EMS systems. I'm not saying that it's a bad ECU, but I really wonder how well it will work on an engine that is as.....optimized...as the Renesis.

(I have nothing against the Megasquirt. I've installed a bunch of them on piston cars with great results. But in this application I have to wonder...)
If you're curious, read that thread I linked to with rotarygod's results on the MS for the rx8. He actually found the idle, so far, to be better once tuned than the stock PCM.

I don't know how much you know about the rx8 and its PCM/tuning, but honestly most rx8 owners on rx8club that are trying to modify their car are NOT happy with it. The stock PCM is wayyyy too unforgiving for things. Every mod that is done that alters anything results in the PCM retuning/relearning the mod and trying to revert it back to stock, or close to, levels. This results in pretty pathetic gains from many mods. Also, the longer you go with the tune the more the PCM learns and continuously recalibrates itself, this results in loss of power over time. Many people have found it beneficial to erase the current tune on the PCM about every month or two to start over with a fresh tune, and go from there. This allows the PCM to stay somewhat manageable with the mods and less loss in power so long as you keep clearing it every so often.

Mazda went all out on the monitoring system for the rx8, it's rather sad actually. With aftermarket piggybacks and Mazsport's new drop in replacement ECU, people are finding tremendously higher gains, while still controlling all the stock parts and emissions components normally, than the stock PCM allows in both FI and n/a situations.

I think the MS is probably a big step in the right direction for modifying rx8's, but that's not really pertinent here since this is a 2nd gen forum, and I've rambled on too much
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2005 | 04:09 PM
  #15  
Aaron Cake's Avatar
Engine, Not Motor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,798
Likes: 128
From: London, Ontario, Canada
When I get some time, I will read the whole thread. Honestly, getting and idle is not exactly rocket science. I don't consider that to be much of an accomplishment.

My main point of curiosity is concerned with what will happen to all the magic in the stock manifold. Do all the valve controlled ports still function? What about the fuel injectors since they are now firing in batch? These questions are likely answered in that thread...I guess if the 'Squirt is installed totally independently of the stock ECU/ECM, then all these stock functions (minus the injectors of course) are unaffected.

But I am going to come clean and say that I don't know a hell of a lot about the RX-8 past what I've already posted. Like most new cars, it doesn't do anything for me (one test drive was enough to confirm that).
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2005 | 04:21 PM
  #16  
neit_jnf's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,057
Likes: 262
From: Around
the MS is been used by rotarygod to gain complete control over the injectors but he left the stock ecu control everything else. He can fine tune the car's afr's now but the magic in the manifold is left to the stock ecu. He said it can be made so that the ms controls all of this but there's no need.

He's still working on getting the ignition timing part to work because the ignition on the rx-8 is independent for all plugs (no waste spark) and also it runs negative split at idle.

Last edited by neit_jnf; Aug 23, 2005 at 04:24 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2005 | 09:51 PM
  #17  
hexadec0079's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh NC
ok, no, i don't have any of the pieces. I was just wondering, not that it should be done. The appeal was that it had more power NA, stock than the T-II.

PS- I already have a T-II, please don't flame my curiousity, thanx
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2005 | 07:29 AM
  #18  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
Bottom line...it's not worth it.
A J-spec 13BT costs less to get up and running.
I'm estimating a minimum of $5,000 to get the engine and have it up and running...even with an MS.
For $5,000 you can get a pretty stout 13BT set-up with an aftermarket turbo producing 300hp+!


-Ted
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2005 | 07:52 AM
  #19  
gerbraldy's Avatar
wtf's a piston
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,717
Likes: 0
From: Englewood, FL
^don't forget the nice ported rebuild with that, my 13bt+tranny only ran $650, alot cheaper than a renesis.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2005 | 10:04 AM
  #20  
Icemark's Avatar
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 24
From: Rohnert Park CA
Originally Posted by RETed
Bottom line...it's not worth it.
A J-spec 13BT costs less to get up and running.
I'm estimating a minimum of $5,000 to get the engine and have it up and running...even with an MS.
For $5,000 you can get a pretty stout 13BT set-up with an aftermarket turbo producing 300hp+!


-Ted
yeah I did see a reni sell on ebay last month for $4500 with no ECU and a cut harness
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
kutukutu1
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
167
Dec 1, 2021 09:01 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:53 AM.