2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Question about turbo vac tubing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 14, 2004 | 11:53 PM
  #1  
ddub's Avatar
Thread Starter
i am legendary
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,478
Likes: 1
From: Kirkland, WA
Question about turbo vac tubing

Alright so I just picked up an s5 turbo for my eventual turbo'd n/a project and had a question about the tubing for the wastegate and BOV. The stuff that was on there clearly looked stock and old, so I wanted to replace it with some silicone tubing. Now I was trying to use the stuff I already had left over from before so I wouldn't have to buy any and had a question. The tubing I have is technically not the right size, it's too small. I am able to get it on with a little persuasion, however, and was wondering if it mattered at all that it was technically smaller than should be on there? What I mean is, will everything still work properly with smaller tubing or should I just cop out and buy some more that is the correct size? Does anyone also know what the correct size IS for these? I have some other silicone tubing that happens to be too big and slips off way too easily, so I didn't want to use that.

Thanks for any input.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2004 | 11:54 PM
  #2  
SonicRaT's Avatar
Super Raterhater
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 10,630
Likes: 3
From: NY, MA, MI, OR, TX, and now LA or AZ!
I've used a bit smaller hose for quite some time. It's just a pain in the *** to get on.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2004 | 11:56 PM
  #3  
ddub's Avatar
Thread Starter
i am legendary
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,478
Likes: 1
From: Kirkland, WA
Originally posted by SonicRaT
I've used a bit smaller hose for quite some time. It's just a pain in the *** to get on.

Yah I've already gotten it on, not that easy

Just wanted to make sure it'd still work properly.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2004 | 10:43 PM
  #4  
jhammons01's Avatar
Carter 2.0
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 6,262
Likes: 7
From: Irvine Ca.
OK dDub. What you need to do is calculate the conductance of the tubing being proposed. This is how much cfm or volumn that is able to move through the tubing. The amount of vacuum being generated by your intake unit also comes into the calculation as well. The lower the vacuum the less the conductance will be effected. Your intake will generate a certain amount of vacuum measured by the lamen in inches of mercury. I prefer to use torr as a measurement of atmosphears. A Piezo vacuum transducer module with a 0.1-999 torr range would be sufficient. A thermocouple vacuum guage would be nice as well. A unit of measure from 10E-2 would also be sufficient.

To be serious The minor conductance differences between the two inside diameters of the tubing will make no difference in the world of vacuum.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2004 | 10:54 PM
  #5  
ddub's Avatar
Thread Starter
i am legendary
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,478
Likes: 1
From: Kirkland, WA
Originally Posted by jhammons01
OK dDub. What you need to do is calculate the conductance of the tubing being proposed. This is how much cfm or volumn that is able to move through the tubing. The amount of vacuum being generated by your intake unit also comes into the calculation as well. The lower the vacuum the less the conductance will be effected. Your intake will generate a certain amount of vacuum measured by the lamen in inches of mercury. I prefer to use torr as a measurement of atmosphears. A Piezo vacuum transducer module with a 0.1-999 torr range would be sufficient. A thermocouple vacuum guage would be nice as well. A unit of measure from 10E-2 would also be sufficient.

To be serious The minor conductance differences between the two inside diameters of the tubing will make no difference in the world of vacuum.
Question was already answered, but thanks for a bunch of info I don't understand
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FD7KiD
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
15
Feb 26, 2021 10:12 PM
FD7KiD
Single Turbo RX-7's
1
Aug 17, 2015 11:50 PM
12abridgeport
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
2
Aug 17, 2015 06:28 PM
KAL797
Test Area 51
0
Aug 11, 2015 03:47 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:01 PM.