2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Pros and Cons to Solid Mounts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 25, 2004 | 09:43 PM
  #1  
eyecandy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,928
Likes: 1
From: Pittsburgh,PA
Pros and Cons to Solid Mounts

What are the pros and cons of soild engine, differential and tranny mounts?

All I can see is less slop and more vibration, are they worth it?
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2004 | 11:23 PM
  #2  
vaughnc's Avatar
knowledge junkie
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,595
Likes: 6
From: Atlanta, GA
Don't forget solid end links & bodylinks. Their for racing only. Go with aftermarket polyurethane and Mazdaspeed competition rubber motor & tranny mounts.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2004 | 02:20 AM
  #3  
Ni5mo180SX's Avatar
White Comet
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,145
Likes: 0
From: Orange County
I think id like to go with the polyurethene engine mounts now available over the Mazda Comp ones im currently employing.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2004 | 02:52 AM
  #4  
S13 Slide's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
From: Washington
i have solid engine and tranny mounts, about to get me a solid diff mount too. alot of people were telling me it would be too much stiff and everything would vibrate, this and that. its just fine imo.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2004 | 08:51 PM
  #5  
eyecandy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,928
Likes: 1
From: Pittsburgh,PA
Originally posted by S13 Slide
i have solid engine and tranny mounts, about to get me a solid diff mount too. alot of people were telling me it would be too much stiff and everything would vibrate, this and that. its just fine imo.
How diffferent are they compared to stock? I was thinking of atleast getting a solid diff mount and the rubber mount that goes in the tranny brace, pop taht out and press in a solid mount.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2004 | 09:16 PM
  #6  
Impreza2RX7's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,424
Likes: 1
From: Millville, NJ
I dont know if I'd go with a solid diff mount, wouldn't it snap from no flex? I've been interested in going to all solid mounts and bushings myself..
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2004 | 09:37 PM
  #7  
Terrh's Avatar
STUCK. I got SNOWNED!!!!!
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 8,737
Likes: 20
From: Windsor, On
MY experience with solid mounts. YMMV.

At the end of last year my engine mounts on both sides were finally trashed. This spring I was broke so I decided to replace both of the pucks with a bolt and a piece of 2x4.
Impressions: releasing clutch moves car much more quickly.

vibration: nonexistant. WTF was everyone talking about with this? I didn't notice any more, not even in the mirrors.

My diff mount lasted about 3 weeks once I did this, though... oops.

the car is much nicer to drive at low (near idle in 1st and 2nd) speeds, now, too.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2004 | 09:40 PM
  #8  
BlackR1's Avatar
Meesto Spakaro
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
From: Redondo Beach, CA
this is a good thread.

Too many people on the internet have it ingrained in their heads that everything must be solid to be good. Solid mounts are good for track cars, but there needs to be some sort of give, be it in parts of the suspension or engine mounts.

Solid mounts can lead to subframe damage-- instead of the bushing or rod giving, the stress will be transferred the frame of the vehicle which is more expensive to repair/replace.

this is why tie rods are made to break-- it is less expensive to replace a tie rod than it is to replace a steering rack.

solid engine mounts are a bit overkill for a street car
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2004 | 09:41 PM
  #9  
Falcoms's Avatar
kill it with BOOMSTICK!
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,227
Likes: 0
From: McHenry, IL
Originally posted by Impreza2RX7
I dont know if I'd go with a solid diff mount, wouldn't it snap from no flex? I've been interested in going to all solid mounts and bushings myself..
Actually, solid mounts would be less likely to break due to lack of flex. The flex is transferred into the chassis instead of the rubber or poly mounts. You only put more stress on the chassis if anything, which is not necissarily a bad thing or a good thing. Depends on what you want
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2004 | 10:15 PM
  #10  
eyecandy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,928
Likes: 1
From: Pittsburgh,PA
Terrh, if I got you right, you broke your diff mount because of the solid engine mounts?

Last edited by eyecandy; Jun 26, 2004 at 10:18 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2004 | 10:29 PM
  #11  
Impreza2RX7's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,424
Likes: 1
From: Millville, NJ
Originally posted by Falcoms
Actually, solid mounts would be less likely to break due to lack of flex. The flex is transferred into the chassis instead of the rubber or poly mounts. You only put more stress on the chassis if anything, which is not necissarily a bad thing or a good thing. Depends on what you want
Sorry, thats what I meant, for a lack of better terms, I've been a retard all weekend from doing so much homework. I think I've read about people having to weld the subframe from the diffmount breaking off on FC's, but I may be mistaken..
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ZacMan
Build Threads
4
Sep 19, 2015 09:20 PM
SCinfidel
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
4
Sep 8, 2015 05:36 PM
Frisky Arab
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
5
Sep 4, 2015 06:17 PM
Pettersen
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
2
Sep 4, 2015 10:10 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:31 AM.