2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

Pros and Cons to Solid Mounts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-25-04, 09:43 PM
  #1  
Rotary Freak

Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
eyecandy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Pittsburgh,PA
Posts: 2,926
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Pros and Cons to Solid Mounts

What are the pros and cons of soild engine, differential and tranny mounts?

All I can see is less slop and more vibration, are they worth it?
The following users liked this post:
EZAS (07-26-23)
Old 06-25-04, 11:23 PM
  #2  
knowledge junkie

 
vaughnc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 5,595
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Don't forget solid end links & bodylinks. Their for racing only. Go with aftermarket polyurethane and Mazdaspeed competition rubber motor & tranny mounts.
Old 06-26-04, 02:20 AM
  #3  
White Comet

 
Ni5mo180SX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Orange County
Posts: 2,145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think id like to go with the polyurethene engine mounts now available over the Mazda Comp ones im currently employing.
Old 06-26-04, 02:52 AM
  #4  
Senior Member

 
S13 Slide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Washington
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i have solid engine and tranny mounts, about to get me a solid diff mount too. alot of people were telling me it would be too much stiff and everything would vibrate, this and that. its just fine imo.
Old 06-26-04, 08:51 PM
  #5  
Rotary Freak

Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
eyecandy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Pittsburgh,PA
Posts: 2,926
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by S13 Slide
i have solid engine and tranny mounts, about to get me a solid diff mount too. alot of people were telling me it would be too much stiff and everything would vibrate, this and that. its just fine imo.
How diffferent are they compared to stock? I was thinking of atleast getting a solid diff mount and the rubber mount that goes in the tranny brace, pop taht out and press in a solid mount.
Old 06-26-04, 09:16 PM
  #6  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
Impreza2RX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Millville, NJ
Posts: 1,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I dont know if I'd go with a solid diff mount, wouldn't it snap from no flex? I've been interested in going to all solid mounts and bushings myself..
Old 06-26-04, 09:37 PM
  #7  
STUCK. I got SNOWNED!!!!!

iTrader: (7)
 
Terrh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Windsor, On
Posts: 8,722
Received 13 Likes on 9 Posts
MY experience with solid mounts. YMMV.

At the end of last year my engine mounts on both sides were finally trashed. This spring I was broke so I decided to replace both of the pucks with a bolt and a piece of 2x4.
Impressions: releasing clutch moves car much more quickly.

vibration: nonexistant. WTF was everyone talking about with this? I didn't notice any more, not even in the mirrors.

My diff mount lasted about 3 weeks once I did this, though... oops.

the car is much nicer to drive at low (near idle in 1st and 2nd) speeds, now, too.
Old 06-26-04, 09:40 PM
  #8  
Meesto Spakaro

 
BlackR1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
this is a good thread.

Too many people on the internet have it ingrained in their heads that everything must be solid to be good. Solid mounts are good for track cars, but there needs to be some sort of give, be it in parts of the suspension or engine mounts.

Solid mounts can lead to subframe damage-- instead of the bushing or rod giving, the stress will be transferred the frame of the vehicle which is more expensive to repair/replace.

this is why tie rods are made to break-- it is less expensive to replace a tie rod than it is to replace a steering rack.

solid engine mounts are a bit overkill for a street car
Old 06-26-04, 09:41 PM
  #9  
kill it with BOOMSTICK!

 
Falcoms's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: McHenry, IL
Posts: 1,227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Impreza2RX7
I dont know if I'd go with a solid diff mount, wouldn't it snap from no flex? I've been interested in going to all solid mounts and bushings myself..
Actually, solid mounts would be less likely to break due to lack of flex. The flex is transferred into the chassis instead of the rubber or poly mounts. You only put more stress on the chassis if anything, which is not necissarily a bad thing or a good thing. Depends on what you want
Old 06-26-04, 10:15 PM
  #10  
Rotary Freak

Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
eyecandy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Pittsburgh,PA
Posts: 2,926
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Terrh, if I got you right, you broke your diff mount because of the solid engine mounts?

Last edited by eyecandy; 06-26-04 at 10:18 PM.
Old 06-26-04, 10:29 PM
  #11  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
Impreza2RX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Millville, NJ
Posts: 1,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Falcoms
Actually, solid mounts would be less likely to break due to lack of flex. The flex is transferred into the chassis instead of the rubber or poly mounts. You only put more stress on the chassis if anything, which is not necissarily a bad thing or a good thing. Depends on what you want
Sorry, thats what I meant, for a lack of better terms, I've been a retard all weekend from doing so much homework. I think I've read about people having to weld the subframe from the diffmount breaking off on FC's, but I may be mistaken..
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ZacMan
Build Threads
4
09-19-15 09:20 PM
SCinfidel
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
4
09-08-15 05:36 PM
Frisky Arab
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
5
09-04-15 06:17 PM
Pettersen
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
2
09-04-15 10:10 AM



Quick Reply: Pros and Cons to Solid Mounts



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:05 PM.