Production Figures
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: menomonee falls, wi
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Production Figures
Does anyone know where to get the information on how many RX7's were manufactured in any given model year? If so, is the information broken down by model type? Trying to satisfy my curiousity.
#2
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
some of it is available on-line or in books.
Almost none is broken down by model type, but there are approx percentages of models based on year.
what year do you need to know about???
Almost none is broken down by model type, but there are approx percentages of models based on year.
what year do you need to know about???
#3
#5
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
Originally posted by ajsan
I'm looking for production figures for 1990.
I'm looking for production figures for 1990.
Well USA FC sales for 90: 9,743
GTUs = less than 200
GTU was approx 1/3 of all FCs sold in USA while the upper models were supposed to be split fairly evenly with around 2000 models of each sold (give or take a couple hundred).
The series 5 cars really have the worst records of what was built and shipped where.
#6
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: menomonee falls, wi
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Icemark,
I would think that with only 9700 of these cars sold in the US that the resale values would be higher. I'm told that my '90 GTU is worth only in the mid 4000 (only 58K miles) . I understand the demand side of the equation, but with this few in circulation I would think that they'd be worth more. Your thoughts?
I would think that with only 9700 of these cars sold in the US that the resale values would be higher. I'm told that my '90 GTU is worth only in the mid 4000 (only 58K miles) . I understand the demand side of the equation, but with this few in circulation I would think that they'd be worth more. Your thoughts?
#7
SOLD THE RX-7!
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 7,451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
no, but the S5 turbo II's are worth lots there is no demand for the non turbos.
$4k is quite a bit. an 87/ 88 would be like 2k. so yes the S5 is higher.
$4k is quite a bit. an 87/ 88 would be like 2k. so yes the S5 is higher.
Trending Topics
#8
Senior Member
Sadly, they're only worth what someone is willing to pay. As a rule, people don't know much about rotaries-- part of what makes this forum so successful-- you almost need to be a good self maintainer. And as Scott mentions, turbos seem to have the edge in carrying higher values. Remember though, we're talking 11-16 year old cars here. To most people, these cars really aren't anything special except for a few like the GTUs, and a few others.
The 90 GTU at $4k or so is probably fair, the condition and the buyer will be where the value is, not the production numbers for that car. Give it 30 years though.....
The 90 GTU at $4k or so is probably fair, the condition and the buyer will be where the value is, not the production numbers for that car. Give it 30 years though.....
#9
I find the top speed figures on the "2nd gen site" to be rather modest. My 88 vert is rated at 121mph. When I got it 2 years ago it was completely stock and would easily do more than 121. Hell it would do 110 up hill.
Just thought that was interesting.
Just thought that was interesting.
#10
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
Originally posted by ajsan
I would think that with only 9700 of these cars sold in the US that the resale values would be higher. I'm told that my '90 GTU is worth only in the mid 4000 (only 58K miles) . I understand the demand side of the equation, but with this few in circulation I would think that they'd be worth more. Your thoughts?
I would think that with only 9700 of these cars sold in the US that the resale values would be higher. I'm told that my '90 GTU is worth only in the mid 4000 (only 58K miles) . I understand the demand side of the equation, but with this few in circulation I would think that they'd be worth more. Your thoughts?
But look at all the newbe posts asking about oil burning or motor longevity. The vast majority of the public thinks that the rotary engine is not reliable, gets poor milage, and burns oil. Granted it is not reliable if a moron takes care of it, and the mileage is not great comparied to a Honda, and they do burn oil (but not as bad as a mid eighties GM V6 or V8, which wasn't even designed to burn oil like the rotary is). But add in mediocre plastic durability and occasional electrical bugs, and you got a car that by many is not considered reliable.
To top that off, Mazda sold over 100000 series 4 RX-7s over just 3 years, so there is a huge availabilty market there.
Anyway that's why the car has poor resale value.
But if you break down the value, really the FC only loose about $750-$1000 a year since new... which is actually very good. Just not as good as some Toyota or BMW or Porsche sports cars. But still better than the almost $1500 a year that the FD seems to depreciate.
Last edited by Icemark; 08-29-02 at 11:09 PM.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Dublin, VA
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Icemark
$1500 a year that the FD seems to depreciate.
$1500 a year that the FD seems to depreciate.
Yes with so many series 4 cars out there and the average buyer not being able to tell the difference the price isn't going to increase much for the series 5.
The FD's on the other hand, there aren't that many so their price is well above what I think they should be for what they are. It's a shame too because it would be nice to buy a newer Rx-7 some day.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
[For Sale] Scratch & Dent, Used, and Open-Box Sale!
SakeBomb Garage
Vendor Classifieds
5
08-09-18 05:54 PM
SakeBomb Garage
Group Buy & Product Dev. FD RX-7
8
10-09-15 10:05 PM