2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

PRE-mix fuel!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 20, 2005 | 07:37 PM
  #1  
Camrann's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
From: Fort worth, TX
PRE-mix fuel!!

I just bought a 91, n/a. Its been rebuilt and only has 8k on the engine and tranny.
The owner before me premixed his gas with two stroke oil with a ratio of .75-.100ounce/ gallon. What is the purpose of this and is it needed and or helpful. Can i just run regular unleaded or will it cause the seals to wear faster.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2005 | 07:43 PM
  #2  
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
Sharp Claws
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 50
From: Central Florida
if the car is setup for strictly premixing then to not premix will kill the engine in a short period of time. i run premix at 100:1 which is about 1 ounce of 2 stroke per gallon of fuel. premixing helps to lubricate the internals of the engine more uniformly rather than the peak of the apex seal causing premature grooving of the rotor housings.

drawbacks of running premix is that it is not good for your catalytic converter and it causes a slight rise in emissions.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2005 | 07:45 PM
  #3  
a7r's Avatar
a7r
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
From: Santa Barbara, CA
You sure it wasn't 1 fluid ounce a gallon?

Find out if the car has the stock MOP (i.e. oil injection pump), and whether or not it's working. If it doesn't, or it isn't working, then you need to keep premixing or fix the MOP. Not doing so will cause your motor to fail prematurely.

drawbacks of running premix is that it is not good for your catalytic converter and it causes a slight rise in emissions.
Not to go off topic, but I've never seen this substantiated. TCW3 burns cleaner than most/all lubricating sump oils. I personally passed California's smog tests with amazing results in my TII, while running 100:1.

Last edited by a7r; Feb 20, 2005 at 07:48 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2005 | 07:46 PM
  #4  
Camrann's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
From: Fort worth, TX
PRE-mix fuel!!

I just bought a 91, n/a. Its been rebuilt and only has 8k on the engine and tranny.
The owner before me premixed his gas with two stroke oil with a ratio of .75-.100ounce/ gallon. What is the purpose of this and is it needed and or helpful. Can i just run regular unleaded or will it cause the seals to wear faster.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2005 | 07:53 PM
  #5  
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
Sharp Claws
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 50
From: Central Florida
not all of the oil will burn completely and it will retain some of the hydrocarbons from the combustion, it is usually not enough to cause a good tuned car to fail but it could cause a borderline car to fail.


it also leaves a nice slimey black residue on the back of my car, lol.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2005 | 07:59 PM
  #6  
a7r's Avatar
a7r
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
From: Santa Barbara, CA
Originally Posted by Karack
not all of the oil will burn completely and it will retain some of the hydrocarbons from the combustion, it is usually not enough to cause a good tuned car to fail but it could cause a borderline car to fail.
Hmm, I didn't see anything like this. I tested two weeks ago, and the hydrocarbon output for my car at 966 RPM was 1 PPM, with average being 29 PPM, and the maximum being 120 PPM. At 2522 RPM I had 9 PPM, with 20 being average, and 140 being maximum. This was with a working, near-stock, emissions system.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2005 | 08:01 PM
  #7  
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
Sharp Claws
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 50
From: Central Florida
you sure you didn't pay someone off? even brand new cars i don't see running that clean, lol.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2005 | 08:07 PM
  #8  
Rxmfn7's Avatar
Do a barrel roll!
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 7,529
Likes: 2
From: Lower Burrell, PA
Originally Posted by Karack
you sure you didn't pay someone off? even brand new cars i don't see running that clean, lol.

Here is a scan from my '86 when it was still N/A. Im not sure why I always hear of everyone having emissions troubles, Ive owned mayn RX-7s , and they all have been very clean cars. This was done with a RB header, single Bonez H-F cat, Greddy cat-back.



Notice the CO ( or lack of ), and very low hydrocarbon readings.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2005 | 08:09 PM
  #9  
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
Sharp Claws
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 50
From: Central Florida
i'm one of the ones having emissions troubles, i'm sure it is a combination of other things as well but i am repeating what our smog tech told me.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2005 | 08:21 PM
  #10  
sar's Avatar
sar
Doin a rebuild.
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
From: Roswell (atl ) Georgia
Those are amazing numbers. I thought that when gas burned it produced co2.... somehow you appear to be burning non carbon based? It is also really strange that your numbers stayed the same despite the rpm tripling.

I want a car like yours lol.
Mine just barely made the HCs after fixing my alternator which was loading my alternator. I will have to get a cat like yours. Maybe I'll add an electric air pump to completely dilute my mixture too.

My HC numbers were low in the 190s and high in the 350s.



To the subject as to not completely jack the thread....
Supposedly premix will burn more cleanly in our engines that normal oil because it is supposed to burn versus normal oil isn't. I would suspect that if you had your omp fed from 2 stroke oil it would drastically decrease your emissions.


Originally Posted by Rxmfn7
Here is a scan from my '86 when it was still N/A. Im not sure why I always hear of everyone having emissions troubles, Ive owned mayn RX-7s , and they all have been very clean cars. This was done with a RB header, single Bonez H-F cat, Greddy cat-back.



Notice the CO ( or lack of ), and very low hydrocarbon readings.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2005 | 08:25 PM
  #11  
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
Sharp Claws
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 50
From: Central Florida
2 stroke oil is made for combustion, regular engine oil isn't so yes i would assume it does burn cleaner but whether it does add emissions still is another matter, i haven't tried comparing one vs the other because i have no OMP anymore.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2005 | 08:45 PM
  #12  
a7r's Avatar
a7r
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
From: Santa Barbara, CA
Originally Posted by Karack
you sure you didn't pay someone off? even brand new cars i don't see running that clean, lol.
I'm positive. I found out after the fact that the smog tech thought I was an inspector, because of the clip-board I had in the car. The car got the book thrown at it and still came out fine.

BTW, I forgot to mention: on top of this, the motor had a pretty agressive intake and exhaust port.

Originally Posted by Rxmfn7
Here is a scan from my '86 when it was still N/A. Im not sure why I always hear of everyone having emissions troubles, Ive owned mayn RX-7s , and they all have been very clean cars. This was done with a RB header, single Bonez H-F cat, Greddy cat-back.
I was wondering the exact same thing. I had heard all of these horror stories, and was expecting my car to fail. I reinstalled the stock ECU and all emissions gear, and then went through the FSM and verified that the equipment checked out. It was no big deal.

Sorry to hijack the thread.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2005 | 10:14 PM
  #13  
311unity13B's Avatar
That's JDM tight, yo
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,599
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
helps clean out the carbon...i put in 4 oz. each tank usually
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2005 | 10:20 PM
  #14  
tecknomage's Avatar
Dyslexia gotta love it
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
From: Geneseo IL usa
so happy i dont have to deal with emissions
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2005 | 10:22 PM
  #15  
tecknomage's Avatar
Dyslexia gotta love it
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
From: Geneseo IL usa
what waite of pre mix oil ?

and is there a max you can run when you still have the oil injectors functioning ?
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2005 | 10:25 PM
  #16  
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
Sharp Claws
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 50
From: Central Florida
i probably wouldn't run lower than 200:1 with the OMP system functional, it would be diluting the fuel mixture too much and lowering the octane.


and 2 stroke oil has no wieght, it is universal but i suggest nothing lower qality than TCW3 certified.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2005 | 10:25 PM
  #17  
Kenteth's Avatar
Like Ghandi with a gun
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,584
Likes: 0
From: Rapid City, SD
Originally Posted by 311unity13B
helps clean out the carbon...i put in 4 oz. each tank usually
umm... what? How about not.

Try it lubricates the internals with less carbon-after ash then the stock lubrication method.

If I wasn't at work I'd say senerior techs forever underimpose networks...and i'd make a cool acronym for it like.. STFUN
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2005 | 10:33 PM
  #18  
Ricer240sx's Avatar
Army Strong...or somethin
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 857
Likes: 0
From: Green Bay, WI
yeah, emmisions are the ghey!!

but a question, anyone having any problems with there injectors after premixing?? i am thinking about doing it.

also, i know theres a search button, but if someone has a link or anything of how to properly remove the OMP that would be great
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2005 | 11:33 PM
  #19  
White_FC's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,228
Likes: 0
From: Darwin, NT, Australia
Been premixing for the past nearly 3years. Never had injector trouble.

Just make sure you use TCW3 rated stuff.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2005 | 01:10 AM
  #20  
a7r's Avatar
a7r
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
From: Santa Barbara, CA
Originally Posted by Ricer240sx
yeah, emmisions are the ghey!!
I think emission controls are pretty cool actually. They keep your car from smelling like ****. 3" high-flow cats can be had for next to nothing these days.

but a question, anyone having any problems with there injectors after premixing??
I'm not.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2005 | 01:13 AM
  #21  
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
Sharp Claws
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 50
From: Central Florida
i would bet premixing is better for your injectors, keeps them lubricated and acts as a cushion for the opening and closing that often wears the seats and causes leaks.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2005 | 07:59 AM
  #22  
Gene's Avatar
10 lb. boost, 5lb. bag
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 2
From: New York, NY
Originally Posted by sar
Those are amazing numbers. I thought that when gas burned it produced co2.... somehow you appear to be burning non carbon based? It is also really strange that your numbers stayed the same despite the rpm tripling.
CO... Carbon Monoxide, not CO2, Carbon Dioxide. CO is bad stuff, major smog component, and if you inhale it it binds to your hemoglobin, meaning the blood can't carry as much oxygen as it should. It eventually works its way out of your system, but you might feel loopy and tired for a while depending on how much you get. Too much can be harmful or deadly, which is why people die if they sit in the garage with the car running.

Since the numbers are percentages, not absolutes, there is no reason they shouldn't stay the same. They might even go down since you get better combustion at higher RPMs.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2005 | 10:37 AM
  #23  
Aaron Cake's Avatar
Engine, Not Motor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,798
Likes: 128
From: London, Ontario, Canada
All this is in the archives. Some very detailed premix threads.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rgordon1979
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
40
Mar 15, 2022 12:04 PM
bryancmatthews
Power FC Forum
14
Oct 5, 2015 08:49 PM
sherff
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
5
Sep 12, 2015 12:22 PM
rotor_veux
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
5
Sep 3, 2015 07:10 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:23 AM.