2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

Port ?s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-10-04, 10:06 PM
  #1  
von
Rotary Freak

Thread Starter
 
von's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: sandiego, ca
Posts: 2,941
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Port ?s

Ok the difference between the turbo and 6port seems to be a difference of 18 degrees on the closing side but volume seems the same or close so either housing should make the same power (leaving out the fact that the bridge on the 6port may ruduce the velocity but the later closing of the port might counteract the difference)

Ok so the overlap seems to remain the same on both housings turbo or N/A wich means a bridge should be just as easy to do on the 6port N/A housing.

Ok if you look at the length of the 6port N/A housing its much longer (because of the later closing of the aux port) wich tells me if you can put a much longer bridge across that port than you can the Turbo housing...If your afraid of cracking the bridge because of the length than just make 2 bridges one for each hole (secondary)(Auxilary)

Do either of these sound good???
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
iamsisyphus
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
6
09-27-15 01:42 PM
josef 91 vert
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
14
09-17-15 09:22 PM



Quick Reply: Port ?s



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:18 AM.