2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Piecing an engine back together...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 11, 2007 | 05:53 PM
  #1  
WhiteRabbit's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
From: Garland
Piecing an engine back together...

Just purchased an '88 Vert, and part of the engine is missing, but how much of it is missing Im not sure. Im trying to see if I can this use link to the craigslist ad, to show the picture from in the engine bay. It's the bottom right picture. It's looks like at least the upper intake manifold, but anything else that anybody might notice?

https://post.craigslist.org/manage/419009351/9yj8s/
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2007 | 06:43 PM
  #2  
Mechanic's Avatar
THE Mazdabator
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 597
Likes: 0
From: NY
looks like everything from the UIM and on. nothing else can be told from those chitty pics
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2007 | 07:27 PM
  #3  
WhiteRabbit's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
From: Garland
ok.



Reply
Old Sep 11, 2007 | 07:46 PM
  #4  
Mechanic's Avatar
THE Mazdabator
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 597
Likes: 0
From: NY
wow damn.. looks like a perfect candidate for a carb conversion.

looks to need uim parts, + some vacuum hoses, and injectors... erm.. check fsm for a blow up version of the uim. i think they should have it. it will show u a lot more than what we can tell you.

while its there you can always remove ratsnest crap.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2007 | 08:19 PM
  #5  
Stanis's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 431
Likes: 2
From: Ocala, FL
The EGR valve looks new. Maybe the guy took the upper intake off thinking this was going to fix a problem with the motor. Just something to think about. Maybe it wasn't able to pass emissions or maybe it was having idle problems. You are missing the upper intake manifold, dynamic chamber, throttle body, and intake duct to throttle body adapter, intake duct, coolant hose, and vacuum hose. I also see missing fuel hoses and a missing pulsation damper. That can be replaced with a $10.39 banjo bolt from summit (12mm × 1.25 banjo bolt).

I'd say if you want a good diagram, go find another RX-7 and have a look at it. You will see all the sensors and locations and such. Also, there are some extra items on the throttle body that you need to pay attention to. Thermowax, BAC, TPS, and cabling.

Best of luck! I'd love to see the after pictures when you have it running again.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2007 | 09:23 PM
  #6  
cpubugs's Avatar
Lovin my 7
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 756
Likes: 0
From: Lakeland, FL
Not sure what all your missing but I know I have it all if you want to buy it. Been trying to sell it all for a year now. Let me know.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2007 | 10:57 AM
  #7  
WhiteRabbit's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
From: Garland
Hmm, well when I checked the carfax too, it said that the last time that inspection was attempted it did not pass as well. I do have some parts left over from the past part out. But as far as exact detail, I dont know the terms of all the parts yet. What does a pulsation damper look like? Here's a shot of the UIM that I still have in the garage:

Reply
Old Sep 20, 2007 | 06:35 PM
  #8  
WhiteRabbit's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
From: Garland
What does a dynamic chamber look like?
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2007 | 06:43 PM
  #9  
clokker's Avatar
Cake or Death?
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,249
Likes: 64
From: Mile High
Originally Posted by WhiteRabbit
What does a dynamic chamber look like?
It's the part that has "13B Injection...Mazda" embossed on it.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2007 | 06:44 PM
  #10  
one320fc's Avatar
Apex Whore
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
From: VA
That part that is in between the Intake and TB is the dynamic chamber
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2007 | 06:46 PM
  #11  
WhiteRabbit's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
From: Garland
very cool, got that since I have the whole UIM. At least I think I do. Gotta double check and see if I still have the TB. Thanks fellas.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2007 | 06:51 PM
  #12  
one320fc's Avatar
Apex Whore
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
From: VA
There is a TB bolted to that intake in the picture you posted
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2007 | 06:54 PM
  #13  
WhiteRabbit's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
From: Garland
GD you're right! Ok, so I gotta ask was there a difference in intake at all on a vert as opposed to a coupe? The coupe I parted out earlier this year had a different setup?
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2007 | 06:55 PM
  #14  
gtu'd's Avatar
oh word
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
From: Newwww Mexico.
The Pulsation Damper is on the end of the fuel rail right below the intake manifold...

It should have a yellowed cap on it.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2007 | 07:00 PM
  #15  
one320fc's Avatar
Apex Whore
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
From: VA
they are the same as long as they were both S4 non-turbo
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2007 | 10:47 PM
  #16  
WhiteRabbit's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
From: Garland
They are definitely both S4 non-turbo. Am I missing a fuel rail? I just sat my UIM back on there but didnt hook anything together yet.



Reply
Old Sep 21, 2007 | 01:04 PM
  #17  
pfsantos's Avatar
(blank)
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,285
Likes: 15
From: YYZ
Jesus, am I on crack or everybody's blind...?

In the pics. from the car missing the upper intake, dyn. chamber etc. look at the area around the primary fuel rail? Can you say FIRE? As in pulsation damper fucked up and caused a fire. Would explain the new parts and newish looking hoses, etc.

White rabbit - you're missing your seconday injectors and rail. the little vac hose behind the thermostat cover cap should go to your FPR (fuel pressure regulator). Fuel hoses attach to bottom of FPR and at the back to the fuel hose from the primary rail. Use new rubbers around the injectors. The rest of the stuff you probably know...i.e. intake snorkel, AFM, etc.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2007 | 01:36 PM
  #18  
WhiteRabbit's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
From: Garland
Crap. That was the furthest from my mind man. Thanks again! What's the probability of internal damage from that sort of fire?
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2007 | 01:41 PM
  #19  
pfsantos's Avatar
(blank)
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,285
Likes: 15
From: YYZ
Only if it got stupid hot and screwed the oil or water o-rings. Try a compression test for a better idea...not sure if it's a guarantee though. Doesn't look like crazy damage, though, so think positive.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2007 | 01:50 PM
  #20  
WhiteRabbit's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
From: Garland
Definitely! So I dont need both fuel rails?
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2007 | 01:57 PM
  #21  
Spectator's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,315
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Yes you do.

I'm pretty sure that an FSM would tell exactly what you are missing.

Look in PfSantos's sig, hes got it linked there.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2007 | 02:21 PM
  #22  
pfsantos's Avatar
(blank)
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,285
Likes: 15
From: YYZ
Other than the huge vacuum leak (which would be enough of a problem in itself), you wouldn't be feeding the beast enough fuel at the good RPM's. Oh, and you wouldn't want those fuel lines open to atmosphere, also.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2007 | 02:57 PM
  #23  
DaveB's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
From: Indian Springs, OH USA
I was thinking fire too. The whole area around the pulsation dampner looks rather sooty to me.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2007 | 04:07 PM
  #24  
WhiteRabbit's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
From: Garland
I cant view my own pics here at work. You mean where the pulsation damper is supposed to be?
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2007 | 07:29 AM
  #25  
pfsantos's Avatar
(blank)
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,285
Likes: 15
From: YYZ
Yes, exactly. All around the pulsation damper and primary fuel rail.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:24 AM.